Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

or

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 001-31458

Newcastle Investment Corp.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland   81-0559116

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

 

1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY   10105
(Address of principal executive offices)   (Zip Code)

(212) 798-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    ¨  Yes    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨    Accelerated filer  ¨    Non-accelerated filer  x    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.

Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 62,004,181 shares outstanding as of May 5, 2010.


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the operating performance of our investments, the stability of our earnings, and our financing needs. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “endeavor,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue” or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual outcome of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:

 

   

our ability to take advantage of opportunities in additional asset classes at attractive risk-adjusted prices;

 

   

our ability to deploy capital accretively;

 

   

the risks that default and recovery rates on our loan portfolios exceed our underwriting estimates;

 

   

the relationship between yields on assets which are paid off and yields on assets in which such monies can be reinvested;

 

   

the relative spreads between the yield on the assets we invest in and the cost of financing;

 

   

changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and bond markets specifically;

 

   

adverse changes in the financing markets we access affecting our ability to finance our investments, or in a manner that maintains our historic net spreads;

 

   

changing risk assessments by lenders that potentially lead to increased margin calls, not extending our repurchase agreements or other financings in accordance with their current terms or entering into new financings with us;

 

   

changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, as well as the success of any hedging strategy we may undertake in relation to such changes;

 

   

the quality and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our cash, including cash inside our CDOs;

 

   

impairments in the value of the collateral underlying our investments and the relation of any such impairments to our judgments as to whether changes in the market value of our securities, loans or real estate are temporary or not and whether circumstances bearing on the value of such assets warrant changes in carrying values;

 

   

legislative/regulatory changes, including but not limited to, any modification of the terms of loans or requirements with respect to asset-backed securities that we may issue;

 

   

reductions in cash flows received from our investments, particularly our CDOs;

 

   

completion of pending investments;

 

   

the availability and cost of capital for future investments;

 

   

competition within the finance and real estate industries; and

 

   

other risks detailed from time to time below, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in our other SEC reports.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The factors noted above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s views only as of the date of this report. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.


Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING EXHIBITS

In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:

 

   

should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk tone of the parties if those statements provide to be inaccurate;

 

   

have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

 

   

may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

 

   

were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP.

FORM 10-Q

INDEX

 

          PAGE

PART I.

   FINANCIAL INFORMATION   

Item 1.

   Financial Statements   
   Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and December 31, 2009    1
   Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009    2
   Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2010    3
   Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009    4
   Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)    5

Item 2.

   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations    22

Item 3.

   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk    42

Item 4.

   Controls and Procedures    45

PART II.

   OTHER INFORMATION   

Item 1.

   Legal Proceedings    46

Item 1A.

   Risk Factors    46

Item 2.

   Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds    63

Item 3.

   Defaults upon Senior Securities    63

Item 4.

   Reserved    63

Item 5.

   Other Information    63

Item 6.

   Exhibits    64

SIGNATURES

   65


Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

 

     March 31, 2010
(Unaudited)
    December 31, 2009  

Assets

    

Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures

    

Real estate securities, available for sale

   $ 1,762,830      $ 1,784,487   

Real estate related loans, held for sale, net

     578,166        554,367   

Residential mortgage loans, held for sale, net

     404,474        380,123   

Subprime mortgage loans subject to call option

     403,190        403,006   

Restricted cash

     233,979        200,251   

Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

     843        —     

Receivables and other assets

     33,271        36,643   
                
     3,416,753        3,358,877   
                

Recourse Financing Structures and Unlevered Assets

    

Real estate securities, available for sale

     1,597        46,308   

Real estate related loans, held for sale, net

     9,722        19,495   

Residential mortgage loans, held for sale, net

     3,516        3,524   

Investments in equity method investees

     41        193   

Operating real estate, held for sale

     9,966        9,966   

Cash and cash equivalents

     11,838        68,300   

Restricted cash

     54        5,127   

Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

     16,116        —     

Receivables and other assets

     1,640        2,838   
                
     54,490        155,751   
                
   $ 3,471,243      $ 3,514,628   
                

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

    

Liabilities

    

Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures

    

CDO bonds payable

   $ 3,623,503      $ 4,058,928   

Other bonds payable

     292,486        303,697   

Notes payable

     4,681        —     

Financing of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option

     403,190        403,006   

Derivative liabilities

     184,798        203,054   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     2,444        2,992   
                
     4,511,102        4,971,677   
                

Recourse Financing Structures and Other Liabilities

    

Repurchase agreements

     12,889        71,309   

Junior subordinated notes payable

     51,257        103,264   

Derivative liabilities

     —          4,100   

Dividends payable

     78        —     

Due to affiliates

     1,482        1,497   

Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations

     7,407        —     

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     4,806        3,433   
                
     77,919        183,603   
                
     4,589,021        5,155,280   
                

Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 1,347,321 and 2,500,000 shares of 9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 496,000 and 1,600,000 shares of 8.05% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and 620,000 and 2,000,000 shares of 8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

     61,583        152,500   

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 62,004,181 and 52,912,513 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively

     620        529   

Additional paid-in capital

     1,065,302        1,033,520   

Accumulated deficit

     (1,809,759     (2,193,383

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

     (435,524     (633,818
                
     (1,117,778     (1,640,652
                
   $ 3,471,243      $ 3,514,628   
                

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

1


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except share data)

 

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2010     2009  

Interest income

   $ 70,092      $ 124,473   

Interest expense

     45,589        60,544   
                

Net interest income

     24,503        63,929   
                

Impairment

    

Valuation allowance (reversal) on loans

     (95,774     120,888   

Other-than-temporary impairment on securities

     64,856        186,582   

Portion of other-than-temporary impairment on securities recognized in other comprehensive income

     (37,114     —     
                
     (68,032     307,470   
                

Net interest income (loss) after impairment

     92,535        (243,541

Other Income (Loss)

    

Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net

     9,677        (8,047

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

     48,346        26,845   

Other income (loss), net

     (1,565     (6,494

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees

     85        13   
                
     56,543        12,317   
                

Expenses

    

Loan and security servicing expense

     1,035        1,402   

General and administrative expense

     3,038        1,626   

Management fee to affiliate

     4,477        4,491   

Depreciation and amortization

     63        72   
                
     8,613        7,591   
                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     140,465        (238,815

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     (40     (33
                

Net Income (Loss)

     140,425        (238,848

Preferred dividends

     (3,268     (3,375

Excess of carrying amount of exchanged preferred stock over fair value of consideration paid - Note 9

     43,043        —     
                

Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stockholders

   $ 180,200      $ (242,223
                

Income (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

    

Basic

   $ 3.36      $ (4.59
                

Diluted

   $ 3.36      $ (4.59
                

Income (loss) from continuing operations per share of common stock, after preferred dividends and excess of carrying amount of exchanged preferred stock over fair value of consideration paid

    

Basic

   $ 3.36      $ (4.59
                

Diluted

   $ 3.36      $ (4.59
                

Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share of common stock

    

Basic

   $ —        $ 0.00   
                

Diluted

   $ —        $ 0.00   
                

Weighted Average Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding

    

Basic

     53,619,643        52,807,232   
                

Diluted

     53,619,643        52,807,232   
                

Dividends Declared per Share of Common Stock

   $ —        $ —     
                

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

2


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (Unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

    Preferred Stock     Common Stock   Additional
Paid-in

Capital
  Accumulated
Deficit
    Accum. Other
Comp.  Income
(Loss)
    Total
Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
 
    Shares     Amount     Shares   Amount        

Stockholders’ equity (deficit) - December 31, 2009

  6,100,000      $ 152,500      52,912,513   $ 529   $ 1,033,520   $ (2,193,383   $ (633,818   $ (1,640,652

Preferred dividends declared

  —          —        —       —       —       (19,019     —          (19,019

Exchange of preferred stock for common stock and cash

  (3,636,679     (90,917   9,091,668     91     31,782     43,043        —          (16,001

Deconsolidation of CDO VII:

               

Cumulative net loss

  —          —        —       —       —       219,175        —          219,175   

Deconsolidation of unrealized loss on securities

  —          —        —       —       —       —          40,715        40,715   

Deconsolidation of unrealized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

  —          —        —       —       —       —          28,514        28,514   

Comprehensive income:

               

Net income (loss)

  —          —        —       —       —       140,425        —          140,425   

Net unrealized gain on securities

  —          —        —       —       —       —          117,928        117,928   

Reclassification of net realized loss on securities into earnings

  —          —        —       —       —       —          14,786        14,786   

Net unrealized gain on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

  —          —        —       —       —       —          (8,528     (8,528

Reclassification of net realized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into earnings

  —          —        —       —       —       —          4,879        4,879   
                     

Total comprehensive income (loss)

                  269,490   
                                                     

Stockholders’ equity (deficit) - March 31. 2010

  2,463,321      $ 61,583      62,004,181   $ 620   $ 1,065,302   $ (1,809,759   $ (435,524   $ (1,117,778
                                                     

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

3


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands)

 

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2010     2009  

Cash Flows From Operating Activities

    

Net income (loss)

   $ 140,425      $ (238,848

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (inclusive of amounts related to discontinued operations):

    

Depreciation and amortization

     63        78   

Accretion of discount and other amortization

     (1,181     (39,308

Interest income in CDOs redirected for reinvestment or CDO bonds paydown

     (4,639     (3,232

Valuation allowance on loans

     (95,774     120,888   

Non-cash directors’ compensation

     —          15   

(Gain) on sale of investments

     (9,677     8,051   

Unrealized (gain) loss on non-hedge derivatives and hedge ineffectiveness

     1,749        6,505   

Other-than-temporary impairment on securities

     27,742        186,582   

(Gain) loss on extinguishment of debt

     (48,346     (26,845

Equity in (earnings) losses of equity method investees

     (85     (13

Distributions of earnings from equity method investees

     85        13   

Change in:

    

Restricted cash

     (122     4,053   

Receivables and other assets

     2,346        8,791   

Due to affiliates

     (15     (35

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     744        (621
                

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

     13,315        26,074   
                

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

    

Purchase of real estate securities

     (3     (1,800

Proceeds from sale of real estate securities

     26,022        131,120   

Purchase of and advances on loans

     —          (13,130

Repayments of loan and security principal

     22,901        17,339   

Margin received on derivative instruments

     5,073        2,760   

Return of margin deposits on total rate of return swaps (treated as derivative instruments)

     —          37   

Payments on settlement of derivative instruments

     (3,668     (9,487

Proceeds from sale of real estate held for sale

     —          1,350   

Distributions of capital from equity method investees

     152        35   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) in investing activities

     50,477        128,224   
                

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

    

Repayments and repurchases of CDO bonds payable

     (11,355     (638

Repayments of other bonds payable

     (11,346     (39,516

Repayments of repurchase agreements

     (58,420     (145,629

Margin deposits under repurchase agreements

     —          (3,422

Return of margin deposits under repurchase agreements

     —          3,705   

Cash consideration paid in exchange for junior subordinated notes

     (9,715     —     

Cash consideration paid to redeem preferred stock

     (16,001     —     

Dividends paid

     (18,942     —     

Payment of deferred financing costs

     —          (200

Restricted cash returned from refinancing activities

     5,525        38,386   
                

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (120,254     (147,314
                

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents

     (56,462     6,984   

Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period

     68,300        49,746   
                

Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period

   $ 11,838      $ 56,730   
                

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

    

Cash paid during the period for interest expense

   $ 32,506      $ 44,305   

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

    

Preferred stock dividends declared but not paid

   $ 78      $ —     

Common stock issued to redeem preferred stock

   $ 28,457      $ —     

Face amount of CDO bonds issued in exchange for previously issued junior subordinated notes of $52,094

   $ 37,625      $ —     

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

4


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

1. GENERAL

Newcastle Investment Corp. (and its subsidiaries, “Newcastle”) is a Maryland corporation that was formed in 2002. Newcastle conducts its business through four primary segments: (i) investments financed with non-recourse collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), (ii) investments financed with other non-recourse debt, (iii) investments financed with recourse debt, including FNMA / FHLMC securities, and (iv) unlevered investments.

Newcastle is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, Newcastle will generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that is distributed to stockholders if it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders by prescribed dates and complies with various other requirements.

Newcastle is party to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with FIG LLC (the “Manager”), an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC, under which the Manager advises Newcastle on various aspects of its business and manages its day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision of Newcastle’s board of directors. For its services, the Manager receives an annual management fee and incentive compensation, both as defined in the Management Agreement.

Approximately 3.8 million shares of Newcastle’s common stock were held by the Manager, through its affiliates, and the principals of an affiliate of the Manager at March 31, 2010. In addition, the Manager, through its affiliates, held options to purchase approximately 1.7 million shares of Newcastle’s common stock at March 31, 2010.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes of Newcastle have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of Newcastle’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating results presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Newcastle’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 and notes thereto included in Newcastle’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined, are defined in Newcastle’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Change in Presentation

Newcastle has changed the format of its consolidated balance sheets for all periods presented to reflect the requirements of new guidance which became effective January 1, 2010. This change in format did not have any effect on any of the reported line items within the balance sheets, other than breaking them out by financing type, or on the statement of consolidated equity (deficit).

2. INFORMATION REGARDING BUSINESS SEGMENTS

Newcastle conducts its business through four primary segments: (i) investments financed with non-recourse collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”), (ii) investments financed with other non-recourse debt, (iii) investments financed with recourse debt, including FNMA / FHLMC securities, and (iv) unlevered investments.

 

5


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Summary financial data on Newcastle’s segments is given below, together with a reconciliation to the same data for Newcastle as a whole:

 

     CDOs (A)     Other
Non-Recourse
(A) (B)
    Recourse     Unlevered     Unallocated     Total  

Three Months Ended March 31, 2010

            

Interest income

   $ 50,943      $ 18,046      $ 859      $ 223      $ 21      $ 70,092   

Interest expense

     28,866        15,039        627        —          1,057        45,589   
                                                

Net interest income (expense)

     22,077        3,007        232        223        (1,036     24,503   

Impairment

     (30,846     (37,292     (60     166        —          (68,032

Other income (loss)

     59,722        (1,398     (663     (1,118     —          56,543   

Depreciation and amortization

     —          —          —          —          63        63   

Other operating expenses

     352        678        4        1        7,515        8,550   
                                                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     112,293        38,223        (375     (1,062     (8,614     140,465   

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     —          —          —          (40     —          (40
                                                

Net income (loss)

     112,293        38,223        (375     (1,102     (8,614     140,425   

Preferred dividends

     —          —          —          —          (3,268     (3,268

Excess of carrying amount of exchanged preferred stock over fair value of consideration paid - Note 9

     —          —          —          —          43,043        43,043   
                                                

Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders

   $ 112,293      $ 38,223      $ (375   $ (1,102   $ 31,161      $ 180,200   
                                                

March 31, 2010

            

Investments (C) (D)

   $ 2,388,797      $ 759,863      $ 18,994      $ 5,848      $ —        $ 3,173,502   

Cash and restricted cash

     233,979        —          200        260        11,432        245,871   

Other assets

     34,114        —          143        16,133        1,480        51,870   
                                                

Total assets

     2,656,890        759,863        19,337        22,241        12,912        3,471,243   
                                                

Debt (D)

     (3,628,184     (695,676     (12,889     —          (51,257     (4,388,006

Derivative liabilities

     (160,736     (24,062     —          —          —          (184,798

Other liabilities

     (1,772     (672     (611     (137     (13,025     (16,217
                                                

Total liabilities

     (3,790,692     (720,410     (13,500     (137     (64,282     (4,589,021
                                                

Preferred stock

     —          —          —          —          (61,583     (61,583
                                                

GAAP book value (E)

   $ (1,133,802   $ 39,453      $ 5,837      $ 22,104      $ (112,953   $ (1,179,361
                                                

Three Months Ended March 31, 2009

            

Interest income

   $ 100,763      $ 20,342      $ 2,518      $ 829      $ 21      $ 124,473   

Interest expense

     38,314        19,156        1,197        —          1,877        60,544   
                                                

Net interest income (expense)

     62,449        1,186        1,321        829        (1,856     63,929   

Impairment

     279,941        3,596        21,294        2,639        —          307,470   

Other income (loss)

     13,800        (5,681     4,233        (37     2        12,317   

Depreciation and amortization

     —          —          —          —          72        72   

Other operating expenses

     440        941        22        1        6,115        7,519   
                                                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

     (204,132     (9,032     (15,762     (1,848     (8,041     (238,815

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

     —          —          —          (33     —          (33
                                                

Net income (loss)

     (204,132     (9,032     (15,762     (1,881     (8,041     (238,848

Preferred dividends

     —          —          —          —          (3,375     (3,375
                                                

Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders

   $ (204,132   $ (9,032   $ (15,762   $ (1,881   $ (11,416   $ (242,223
                                                

 

(A) Assets held within CDOs and other non-recourse structures are not available to satisfy obligations outside of such financings, except to the extent Newcastle receives net cash flow distributions from such structures. Furthermore, economic losses from such structures cannot exceed Newcastle’s invested equity in them. Therefore, economically their book value cannot be less than zero, except for the amounts described in note (B) below.
(B) Includes all of the manufactured housing loan financing, of which $7.0 million (carrying value) was recourse as of March 31, 2010.
(C) At March 31, 2010, carrying values of investments in the unlevered segment include $1.6 million of real estate securities, $4.2 million of real estate related loans and $0.04 million of interests in a joint venture.

 

6


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

(D) Included in the other non-recourse segment were $403.2 million of Investments and Debt at March 31, 2010, representing the loans subject to call option of the two subprime securitizations and the corresponding financing.
(E) Newcastle cannot economically lose more than its investment amount in any given non-recourse financing structure. Therefore, impairment recorded in excess of such investment, which results in negative GAAP book value for a given non-recourse financing structure, cannot economically be incurred and will eventually be reversed through amortization, sales at gains, or as gains at the deconsolidation or termination of such non-recourse financing structure. For non-recourse financing structures with negative GAAP book value, except as noted in (B) above, the aggregate negative GAAP book value which will eventually be recorded as an increase to GAAP book value is $706.8 million as of March 31, 2010.

Equity Method Investees

The following table summarizes the activity for significant equity method investees:

 

     Real Estate Loan  

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 193   

Distributions from equity method investees

     (237

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

     85   
        

Balance at March 31, 2010

   $ 41   
        

Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which changes the definition of a VIE and changes the methodology to determine who is the primary beneficiary of, or in other words who consolidates, a VIE. Furthermore, it eliminates the scope exception for qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs), which are now subject to the VIE consolidation rules. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. As a result, on January 1, 2010, Newcastle deconsolidated a non-recourse financing structure, CDO VII. Newcastle determined that it does not have the current power to direct the relevant activities of CDO VII as an event of default had occurred and we may be removed as the collateral manager by a single party. The deconsolidation has reduced Newcastle’s gross assets by $149.4 million, reduced liabilities by $437.8 million and increased equity by $288.4 million. The deconsolidation also reduced revenues and expenses, but its impact was not material to the net income applicable to common stockholders. As a result of this new guidance, Newcastle has interests in the following unconsolidated VIE at March 31, 2010, in which it has a significant interest, in addition to the subprime securitizations which are described in Note 4:

 

Entity

   Gross Assets (A)    Debt (B)    Carrying Value of Newcastle’s
Investment (C)

CDO VII

   $ 493,449    $ 516,521    $ —  

 

(A) Face amount.
(B) Includes $60.0 million face amount of debt owned by Newcastle with a carrying value of zero at March 31, 2010.
(C) Represent’s Newcastle’s maximum exposure to loss from these entities.

Gain (Loss) on Settlement of Investments, Net and Other Income (Loss), Net

These items are comprised of the following:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     2010     2009  

Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net

    

Gain on settlement of real estate securities

   $ 13,817      $ 7,388   

Loss on settlement of real estate securities

     (861     (15,619

Gain on disposition of loans held for sale

     —          180   

Realized gain (loss) on termination of derivative instruments

     (3,279     4   
                
   $ 9,677      $ (8,047
                

Other income (loss), net

    

Gain (loss) on non-hedge derivative instruments

   $ (1,748 )$      3,116   

Unrealized (loss) recognized at de-designation of hedges

     —          (8,797

Hedge ineffectiveness

     (1     (828

Other income (loss)

     184        15   
                
   $ (1,565   $ (6,494
                

 

7


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

3. REAL ESTATE SECURITIES

The following is a summary of Newcastle’s real estate securities at March 31, 2010, all of which are classified as available for sale and are, therefore, reported at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income, except for securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired.

 

    Amortized Cost Basis                         Weighted Average  
    Outstanding
Face Amount
  Before
Impairment
  Other-Than-
Temporary
Impairment (A)
    After
Impairment
  Gross Unrealized     Carrying Value (B)   Number
of
Securities
  Rating (C)   Coupon     Yield     Maturity
(Years)
(D)
  Principal
Subordination
(E)
 

Asset Type

          Gains   Losses                

CMBS-Conduit

  $ 1,416,362   $ 1,228,967   $ (446,387   $ 782,580   $ 64,511   $ (185,075   $ 662,016     190   BBB-   5.77   9.78   3.7   10.4

CMBS- Single Borrower

    625,928     609,647     (47,088     562,559     9,204     (130,577     441,186     70   BB-   4.24   5.85   2.1   8.6

CMBS-Large Loan

    85,305     87,032     (17,514     69,518     —       (24,369     45,149     11   B+   1.78   2.04   1.0   11.3

REIT Debt

    394,550     394,396     —          394,396     13,128     (15,551     391,973     46   BB+   6.14   5.87   3.8   N/A   

ABS-Subprime (F)

    418,268     415,103     (248,246     166,857     6,543     (15,730     157,670     94   B   1.67   13.37   4.2   18.7

ABS-Manufactured Housing

    50,534     49,108     —          49,108     736     (3,503     46,341     9   BBB+   6.69   7.25   5.5   37.2

ABS-Franchise

    32,780     33,170     (20,650     12,520     42     (2,994     9,568     15   B   3.84   5.05   2.4   18.3

FNMA/FHLMC (G)

    4,164     5,271     —          5,271     58     —          5,329     1   AAA   5.73   3.98   3.6   N/A   

CDO (H)

    78,852     14,734     (14,734     —       —       —          —       4   C   4.14   0.00   —     N/A   
                                                                         

Debt Security Total /Average (I)

    3,106,743     2,837,428     (794,619     2,042,809     94,222     (377,799     1,759,232     440   BB   4.80   7.87   3.3  
                                         

Equity Securities

      1,388     (276     1,112     4,083     —          5,195     2          
                                                         

Total

    $ 2,838,816   $ (794,895   $ 2,043,921   $ 98,305   $ (377,799   $ 1,764,427   $ 442          
                                                         

 

(A) Represents the cumulative impairment against amortized cost basis recorded through earnings, net of the effect of the cumulative adjustment as a result of the adoption of new accounting guidance on impairment in 2009.
(B) See Note 6 regarding the estimation of fair value, which is equal to carrying value for all securities.
(C) Represents the weighted average of the ratings of all securities in each asset type, expressed as an S&P equivalent rating. For each security rated by multiple rating agencies, the lowest rating is used. FNMA/FHLMC securities have an implied AAA rating. Ratings provided were determined by third party rating agencies as of a particular date, may not be current and are subject to change (including the assignment of a “negative watch”) at any time.
(D) The weighted average maturity is based on the timing of expected principal reduction on the assets.
(E) Percentage of the outstanding face amount of securities that is subordinate to Newcastle’s investments.
(F) Includes the retained bonds with face amount of $52.5 million and carrying value of $1.6 million from Securitization Trust 2006 and Securitization Trust 2007 (Note 4). The residual interests were fully written off as of March 31, 2010.
(G) Amortized cost basis and carrying value include principal receivable of $0.9 million.
(H) Includes one CDO bond issued by a third party and three CDO bonds issued by CDO VII, which has been deconsolidated, and held as investments by Newcastle.
(I) The total outstanding face amount of fixed rate securities was $2.2 billion, and of floating rate securities was $0.9 billion.

 

8


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Unrealized losses that are considered other-than-temporary are recognized currently in income. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Newcastle recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges (“OTTI”) of $64.9 million (gross of $37.1 million of the portion of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income) with respect to real estate securities. Based on management’s analysis of these securities, the performance of the underlying loans and changes in market factors, Newcastle noted adverse changes in the expected cash flows on certain of these securities and concluded that they were other-than-temporarily impaired. Any remaining unrealized losses on Newcastle’s securities were primarily the result of changes in market factors, rather than issue-specific credit impairment. The following table summarizes Newcastle’s securities in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2010.

 

    Amortized Cost Basis   Gross Unrealized             Weighted Average

Securities in
an Unrealized
Loss Position

  Outstanding
Face
Amount
  Before
Impairment
  Other-than-
Temporary
Impairment
    After
Impairment
  Gains   Losses     Carrying
Value
  Number
of
Securities
  Rating   Coupon     Yield     Maturity
(Years)

Less Than Twelve Months

  $ 191,811   $ 156,835   $ (65,805   $ 91,030   $ —     $ (4,979     86,051   25   BB+   5.11   11.46   4.7

Twelve or More Months

    1,437,391     1,429,357     (220,955     1,208,402     —       (372,820     835,582   232   BB-   4.61   5.15   3.2
                                                                     

Total

  $ 1,629,202   $ 1,586,192   $ (286,760   $ 1,299,432   $ —     $ (377,799   $ 921,633   257   BB   4.67   5.59   3.4
                                                                     

Newcastle performed an assessment of all of its debt securities that are in an unrealized loss position (unrealized loss position exists when a security’s amortized cost basis, excluding the effect of OTTI, exceeds its fair value) and determined the following:

 

     March 31, 2010  
     Fair Value    Amortized
Cost Basis
   Unrealized Losses  
           Credit (B)     Non-Credit (C)  

Securities Newcastle intends to sell

   $ —      $ —      $ —        N/A   

Securities Newcastle is more likely than not to be required to sell (A)

     —        —        —        N/A   

Securities Newcastle has no intent to sell and is not more likely than not to be required to sell:

          

Credit impaired securities

     80,288      127,790      (283,219   (47,502

Non credit impaired securities

     841,345      1,171,642      —        (330,297
                            

Total debt securities in an unrealized loss position

     921,633      1,299,432      (283,219   (377,799
                            

 

(A) Newcastle may, at times, be more likely than not to be required to sell certain securities for liquidity purposes. While the amount of the securities to be sold may be an estimate, and the securities to be sold have not yet been identified, Newcastle must make its best estimate, which is subject to significant judgment regarding future events, and may differ materially from actual future sales.
(B) Excluding the effect of previously recorded OTTI. This amount is required to be recorded as other-than-temporary impairment through earnings. In measuring the portion of credit losses, Newcastle’s management estimates the expected cash flow for each of the securities. This evaluation includes a review of the credit status and the performance of the collateral supporting those securities, including the credit of the issuer, key terms of the securities and the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends. Significant inputs in estimating the cash flows include management’s expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates and loss severities. Credit losses are measured as the decline in the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the investment’s effective interest rate.
(C) This amount represents unrealized losses on securities that are due to non-credit factors and is required to be recorded through other comprehensive income.

The following table summarizes the activity related to credit losses on debt securities for the three months ended March 31, 2010:

 

Beginning balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income

   $ (408,782

Additions for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized

     (1,113

Increases to credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized and a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income

     (37,426

Additions for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized without any portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income

     (65,330

Reduction for credit losses on securities for which no OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income at March 31, 2010

     115,400   

Reduction for securities sold during the period

     7,412   

Reduction for securities deconsolidated during the period

     105,356   

Reduction for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security

     1,264   
        

Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income

   $ (283,219
        

 

9


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

The table below summarizes the geographic distribution of the collateral securing our CMBS and ABS at March 31, 2010 (in thousands):

 

     CMBS     ABS  

Geographic Location

   Outstanding Face Amount    Percentage     Outstanding Face Amount    Percentage  

Western U.S.

   $ 532,005    25.0   $ 144,851    28.9

Northeastern U.S.

     484,626    22.8     93,823    18.7

Southeastern U.S.

     412,327    19.4     121,259    24.2

Midwestern U.S.

     284,932    13.4     68,972    13.8

Southwestern U.S.

     236,096    11.1     55,788    11.1

Other

     155,406    7.3     16,881    3.3

Foreign

     22,203    1.0     8    0.0
                          
   $ 2,127,595    100.0   $ 501,582    100.0
                          

Geographic concentrations of investments expose Newcastle to the risk of economic downturns within the relevant regions, particularly given the current unfavorable market conditions. These market conditions may make regions more vulnerable to downturns in certain market factors. Any such downturn in a region where Newcastle holds significant investments could have a material, negative impact on Newcastle.

4. REAL ESTATE RELATED LOANS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS AND SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LOANS

All of Newcastle’s loan investments were classified as held for sale as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 and marked to the lower of carrying value or fair value.

The following is a summary of real estate related loans, residential mortgage loans and subprime mortgage loans at March 31, 2010. The loans contain various terms, including fixed and floating rates, self-amortizing and interest only. They are generally subject to prepayment.

 

Loan Type

  Outstanding
Face Amount
  Carrying
Value
  Loan
Count
  Wtd. Avg.
Yield
    Weighted
Average
Coupon
    Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years) (A)
  Floating Rate
Loans as a %
of Face
Amount
    Delinquent Face
Amount (B)

Mezzanine Loans

  $ 717,134   $ 250,066   21   36.52   4.76   1.9   85.5   $ 130,258

Corporate Bank Loans

    291,598     207,246   9   11.11   7.95   3.7   100.0     37,081

B-Notes

    308,006     101,452   11   26.58   4.43   2.0   84.2     131,589

Whole Loans

    56,085     29,124   3   19.09   2.91   4.7   96.2     —  
                                           

Total Real Estate Related Loans Held for Sale, Net (C)

  $ 1,372,823   $ 587,888   44   24.98   5.29   2.4   88.7   $ 298,928
                                           

Residential Loans

  $ 67,694   $ 51,316   236   5.12   2.53   5.7   100.0   $ 6,570

Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio I

    166,684     135,609   4,288   8.48   8.76   7.4   1.3     2,629

Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio II

    236,065     221,065   7,790   8.45   9.75   6.6   17.3     4,101
                                           

Total Residential Mortgage Loans Held for Sale, Net (C)

  $ 470,443   $ 407,990   12,314   8.04   8.36   6.8   23.5   $ 13,300
                                           

Subprime Mortgage Loans Subject to Call Option

  $ 406,217   $ 403,190            
                       

 

(A) The weighted average maturity is based on the timing of expected principal reduction on the assets.
(B) Includes loans that are non-performing, in foreclosure, under bankruptcy, or considered real estate owned.
(C) Carrying value includes interest receivable of $0.1 million for the residential housing loans and principal and interest receivable of $6.6 million for the manufactured housing loans.

 

10


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

The following is a reconciliation of the related loss allowance.

 

     Real Estate
Related Loans
    Residential
Mortgage Loans
 

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ (822,409   $ (96,409

Charge-offs

     13,199        2,620   

Deconsolidation of CDO VII

     5,263        —     

Recoveries

     —          —     

Valuation (allowance) reversal on loans

     59,092        36,682   
                

Balance at March 31, 2010

   $ (744,855   $ (57,107
                

The charge-offs of $13.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 represent two loans which were either sold or paid off at a discounted price during the period.

Securitization of Subprime Mortgage Loans

The following table presents information on the retained interests in Newcastle’s securitizations of subprime mortgage loans at March 31, 2010:

 

     Subprime Portfolio
     I    II

Total securitized loans (unpaid principal balance) (A)

   $ 571,635    $ 754,874

Loans subject to call option (carrying value)

   $ 299,176    $ 104,014

Retained interests (fair value) (B)

   $ 1,377    $ 192

 

(A) Average loan seasoning of 56 months and 38 months for Subprime Portfolios I and II, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
(B) The retained interests include retained bonds of the securitizations. As of March 31, 2010, Newcastle’s residual interests have been written off. Fair value is estimated based on pricing models.

The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the underlying subprime mortgage loans, and related financing, in the securitizations as of March 31, 2010:

 

     Subprime Portfolio  
     I     II  

Loan unpaid principal balance (UPB)

   $ 571,635      $ 754,874   

Weighted average coupon rate of loans

     6.83     6.55

Delinquencies of 60 or more days (UPB) (A)

   $ 159,833      $ 279,077   

Net credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010

   $ 9,462      $ 21,145   

Cumulative net credit losses

   $ 134,989      $ 124,392   

Cumulative net credit losses as a % of original UPB

     8.99     11.43

Percentage of ARM loans (B)

     53.5     66.1

Percentage of loans with loan-to-value ratio >90%

     10.50     17.20

Percentage of interest-only loans

     23.2     3.9

Face amount of debt (C)

   $ 551,270      $ 722,057   

Weighted average funding cost of debt (D)

     1.57     2.02

 

(A) Delinquencies include loans 60 or more days past due, in foreclosure, under bankruptcy filing or real estate owned.
(B) ARM loans are adjustable-rate mortgage loans. An option ARM is an adjustable-rate mortgage that provides the borrower with an option to choose from several payment amounts each month for a specified period of the loan term. None of the loans in the subprime portfolios are an option ARM.
(C) Excludes face amount of $19.7 million and $32.8 million of retained notes for Subprime Portfolios I and II, respectively, at March 31, 2010.
(D) Includes the effect of applicable hedges.

Newcastle received net cash inflows of $0.1 million and $0.2 million from the retained interests of Subprime Portfolios I and II, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

The weighted average yield of the retained notes of Subprime Portfolios I and II was 18.38%, as of March 31, 2010. The loans subject to call option and the corresponding financing recognize interest income and expense based on the expected weighted average coupons of the loans subject to call option at the call date of 9.24% and 8.68% for Subprime Portfolio’s I and II, respectively.

 

11


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

5. DEBT OBLIGATIONS

The following table presents certain information regarding Newcastle’s debt obligations and related hedges at March 31, 2010:

 

                                          Collateral    

Debt Obligation/Collateral

  Month
Issued
    Outstanding
Face
Amount
  Carrying
Value
  Unhedged
Weighted
Average
Funding Cost (A)
  Final Stated
Maturity
    Weighted
Average
Funding
Cost (B)
    Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years)
  Face
Amount
of
Floating
Rate

Debt
  Outstanding
Face
Amount (C)
  Amortized
Cost Basis (C)
  Carrying
Value (C)
  Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years)
  Floating Rate
Face
Amount (C)
  Aggregate
Notional
Amount
of
Current
Hedges

CDO Bonds Payable

                           

CDO IV (D)

  Mar 2004      $ 365,447   $ 364,347   1.21%   Mar 2039      2.89   2.9   $ 341,411   $ 416,783   $ 353,067   $ 261,887   3.2   $ 165,566   $ 165,300

CDO V (D)

  Sep 2004        440,773     439,219   0.99%   Sep 2039      2.73   3.1     428,395     502,232     375,718     285,052   3.3     205,773     188,367

CDO VI (D)

  Apr 2005        435,043     433,585   0.75%   Apr 2040      3.13   3.9     427,150     482,713     261,387     222,943   2.9     171,613     224,702

CDO VIII

  Nov 2006        675,563     675,149   0.94%   Nov 2052      2.08   3.8     667,963     814,914     458,787     465,321   3.6     571,584     161,655

CDO IX

  May 2007        532,125     537,249   0.78%   May 2052      1.59   4.7     532,125     828,094     452,632     465,089   2.4     628,042     91,694

CDO X

  Jul 2007        1,175,000     1,173,954   0.37%   Jul 2052      4.49   5.3     1,175,000     1,336,375     1,003,997     925,559   3.7     297,300     943,764
                                                                   
      3,623,951     3,623,503       3.08   4.3     3,572,044     4,381,111     2,905,588     2,625,851   3.3     2,039,878     1,775,482
                                                                   

Other Bonds Payable

                           

MH loans Portfolio I (E)

  Jan 2006        101,719     101,718   LIBOR+0.75%   (E   5.21   —       101,719     166,684     135,609     135,609   7.4     2,123     —  

MH loans Portfolio II (F)

  Aug 2006        191,336     190,768   LIBOR+1.00%   Aug 2011      6.25   1.2     191,336     236,065     221,065     221,065   6.6     40,852     —  
                                                                   
      293,055     292,486       5.89   0.8     293,055     402,749     356,674     356,674   6.9     42,975     —  
                                                                   

Notes Payable (J)

                           

Residential Mortgage Loans

  Aug 2004        4,681     4,681   LIBOR+0.90%   Dec 2034      1.15   5.8     4,681     4,681     4,681     4,681   5.8     4,681     —  
                                                                   
      4,681     4,681       1.15   5.8     4,681     4,681     4,681     4,681   5.8     4,681     —  
                                                                   

Repurchase Agreements (G)

                           

RE securities, loans and properties

  Various        12,889     12,889   LIBOR+2.43%   (G   2.68   —       12,889     153,285     18,994     18,994   0.3     141,332     —  
                                                                   
      12,889     12,889       2.68   —       12,889     153,285     18,994     18,994   0.3     141,332     —  
                                                                   

Corporate

                           

Junior subordinated notes payable (H)

  Mar 2006        51,004     51,257   7.574%(H)   Apr 2035      7.42   25.1     —       —       —       —     —       —       —  
                                                                   
      51,004     51,257       7.42   25.1     —       —       —       —     —       —       —  
                                                                   

Subtotal debt obligations

      3,985,580     3,984,816       3.33   4.3   $ 3,882,669   $ 4,941,826   $ 3,285,937   $ 3,006,200   3.5   $ 2,228,866   $ 1,775,482
                                                                   

Financing on subprime mortgage loans subject to call option

  (I     406,217     403,190                      
                                   

Total debt obligations

    $ 4,391,797   $ 4,388,006                      
                                   

 

(A) Weighted average, including floating and fixed rate classes and excluding the amortization of deferred financing costs.
(B) Including the effect of applicable hedges.
(C) Including restricted cash held for reinvestment in CDOs. The face amount and carrying value of Newcastle’s unlevered investments (real estate loans and securities) were $179.0 million and $5.8 million, respectively, as of March 31, 2010.
(D) CDOs IV, V and VI were not in compliance with their applicable over collateralization tests as of March 31, 2010. Newcastle is not receiving cash flows from these CDOs (other than senior management fees) and expects these CDOs to remain out of compliance for the foreseeable future.
(E) See further description below.
(F) Of which $7.1 million face amount is recourse financing.
(G) The counterparties on these repurchase agreements are Deutsche Bank ($4.9 million) and Citigroup ($8.0 million). These non-FNMA/FHLMC financings were repaid in full in April 2010.
(H) In April 2009, Newcastle entered into an exchange agreement with the holder of the trust preferred securities under which Newcastle will effectively be accruing interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum beginning February 1, 2009 for a maximum of six quarters, after which the rate reverts to 7.574% through April 2016 and to LIBOR + 2.25% after April 2016. In connection with the preferred stock exchange (Note 9), the interest rate reverted to 7.574% on February 1, 2010.
(I) Issued in April 2006 and July 2007. See Note 4 regarding the securitizations of Subprime Portfolios I and II.
(J) Notes payable issued to CDO VII, which was previously eliminated in consolidation.

 

12


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

See Note 2 regarding the deconsolidation of CDO VII.

In the first quarter of 2010, Newcastle repurchased $56.3 million face amount of CDO bonds for $7.6 million. As a result, Newcastle extinguished $56.3 million face amount of CDO debt and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of 48.3 million in the first quarter of 2010.

On January 29, 2010, Newcastle entered into an Exchange Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2010 (the “Exchange Agreement”), with Taberna Capital Management, LLC and certain of its affiliates (collectively, “Taberna”), pursuant to which Newcastle and Taberna agreed to exchange (the “Exchange”) approximately $52.1 million aggregate principal amount of junior subordinated notes due 2035 for approximately $37.6 million face amount of previously issued CDO securities and approximately $9.7 million of cash held by Newcastle. In other words, $51.9 million face amount of Newcastle’s debt, in the form of junior subordinated notes payable, was repurchased and extinguished for GAAP purposes in exchange for (i) the payment of $9.7 million of cash and (ii) the reissuance of $37.6 million face amount of CDO bonds payable (which had previously been repurchased by Newcastle). In connection with the Exchange, Newcastle paid or reimbursed $0.6 million of expenses incurred by Taberna, various indenture trustees and their respective advisors in accordance with the terms of the Exchange Agreement. Newacastle accounted for this exchange as a troubled debt restructuring involving the partial repayment of debt. As a result, Newcastle recorded no gain or loss. The following table presents certain information regarding the exchange:

 

           Consideration
     Repurchased junior
subordinated notes
    Cash    Reissued CDO bonds     Total

Outstanding face amount

   $ 51,891      $ 9,715    $ 37,625      $ 47,340

Weighted average coupon

     7.574 % (A)      N/A      LIBOR + 0.66 % (B)   

Weighted average contractual maturity

     April 2035           June 2052     

Collateral

    
 
General credit of
Newcastle
  
  
      
 
Assets within the
respective CDOs
  
  
 

 

(A) LIBOR + 2.25% after April 2016
(B) Weighted average effective interest rate of approximately LIBOR+0.35% after the Exchange.

The fair value of the consideration paid approximated the fair value of the repurchased junior subordinated notes of $16.7 million.

On April 15, 2010, Newcastle completed a securitization transaction to refinance its Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio I (the “Portfolio”). Newcastle sold approximately $164.1 million outstanding principal balance of manufactured housing loans to Newcastle MH I LLC (the “Issuer”), an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Newcastle. The Issuer issued approximately $134.5 million aggregate principal amount of asset-backed notes (the “Notes”), of which $97.6 million was sold to third parties and $36.9 million was sold to certain CDOs managed and consolidated by Newcastle. Beginning in January 2009, the previously existing financing on this portfolio ($101.7 million as of March 31, 2010) became callable at the option of the lender, and the principal and interest payments from the Portfolio (net of expenses and payments related to related interest rate swap contracts) were used to repay the previously existing debt. At the closing of the securitization transaction, Newcastle used the gross proceeds received from the issuance of the Notes to repay the previously existing debt in full, terminate the related interest rate swap contracts, pay the related transaction costs and increase its unrestricted cash by approximately $14 million. Newcastle is currently evaluating the impact of this transaction on its financial results, which will be recorded in the second quarter of 2010.

In April 2010, Newcastle repaid in full its outstanding repurchase agreements of $12.9 million as of March 31, 2010.

 

13


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Summary Table

Newcastle held the following financial instruments at March 31, 2010:

 

    Principal
Balance or
Notional
Amount
  Carrying
Value
  Fair Value  

Fair Value Method (A)

  Weighted
Average
Yield/Funding
Cost
    Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years)
 

Assets

           

Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures (F)

           

Financial instruments:

           

Real estate securities, available for sale*

  $ 2,913,513   $ 1,762,830   $ 1,762,830   Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models   7.83   3.5   

Real estate related loans, held for sale

    1,187,579     578,166     578,181   Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models   24.93   2.5   

Residential mortgage loans, held for sale

    466,648     404,474     404,474   Pricing models   8.07   7.0   

Subprime mortgage loans subject to call option (B)

    406,217     403,190     403,190   (B)   9.09   (B

Restricted cash*

    233,979     233,979     233,979      

Receivables and other assets

      34,114     34,114      
                   
    $ 3,416,753   $ 3,416,768      
                   

Recourse Financing Structures and Unlevered Assets

           

Financial instruments:

           

Real estate securities, available for sale*

  $ 193,230   $ 1,597   $ 1,597   Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models   71.50   0.4   

Real estate related loans, held for sale

    185,244     9,722     9,722   Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models   28.26   1.6   

Residential mortgage loans, held for sale

    3,795     3,516     3,516   Pricing models   4.98   2.8   

Restricted cash*

    54     54     54      

Cash and cash equivalents*

    11,838     11,838     11,838      

Investments in equity method investees

      41     41      

Operating real estate, held for sale

      9,966     9,966      

Receivables and other assets

      17,756     17,756      
                   
    $ 54,490   $ 54,490      
                   

Liabilities

           

Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures (F) (G)

           

Financial instruments:

           

CDO bonds payable

  $ 3,623,951   $ 3,623,503   $ 1,546,623   Pricing models   3.08   4.3   

Other bonds payable ($7.1 million face amount is recourse)

    293,055     292,486     269,578   Pricing models   5.89   0.8   

Notes payable

    4,681     4,681     3,803   Broker quotation   1.15   5.8   

Financing of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option (B)

    406,217     403,190     403,190   (B)   9.09   (B

Interest rate swaps, treated as hedges (C )(E)*

    1,775,482     160,736     160,736   Counterparty quotations   N/A      (C

Non-hedge derivatives (D)(E)*

    239,957     24,062     24,062   Counterparty quotations   N/A      (D

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

      2,444     2,444      
                   
    $ 4,511,102   $ 2,410,436      
                   

Recourse Financing Structures and Other Liabilities (G)

           

Financial instruments:

           

Repurchase agreements

  $ 12,889   $ 12,889   $ 12,889   Market comparables   2.68   0.0   

Junior subordinated notes payable

    51,004     51,257     16,423   Pricing models   7.42   25.1   

Due to affiliates

      1,482     1,482      

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

      12,291     12,291      
                   
    $ 77,919   $ 43,085      
                   

 

* Measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

14


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

(A) Methods are listed in order of priority. In the case of real estate securities and real estate related loans, broker quotations are obtained if available and practicable, otherwise counterparty quotations or pricing service valuations are obtained or, finally, internal pricing models are used. Internal pricing models are only used for (i) securities and loans that are not traded in an active market, and, therefore, have little or no price transparency, and for which significant unobservable inputs must be used in estimating fair value, or (ii) loans or debt obligations which are private and untraded.
(B) These two items result from an option, not an obligation, to repurchase loans from Newcastle’s subprime mortgage loan securitizations (Note 4), are noneconomic until such option is exercised, and are equal and offsetting.
(C) Represents current swap agreements as follows:

 

Year of Maturity

   Weighted Average Month of
Maturity
   Aggregate Notional
Amount
   Weighted Average
Fixed Pay Rate
    Aggregate
Fair Value
Liability,
Net

Agreements which receive 1-Month LIBOR:

          

2011

   Dec    $ 91,694    5.00   $ 6,266

2014

   Oct      16,235    5.09     1,776

2015

   Sep      959,697    5.31     85,576

2016

   May      180,155    5.04     19,818

2017

   Aug      174,034    5.24     22,680

Agreements which receive 3-Month LIBOR:

          

2014

   Jun      353,667    4.20     24,620
                  
      $ 1,775,482      $ 160,736
                  

 

(D) These include three interest rate swaps with a total notional balance of $240.0 million. The maturity dates of the $89.7 million, $4.8 million and $145.4 million interest rate swaps are January 2016, January 2016 and June 2016, respectively. Newcastle entered into these swap agreements to reduce its exposure to interest rate changes on the floating rate financings of its manufactured housing loan portfolios. These swaps were dedesignated as hedges for hedge accounting purposes.
(E) Newcastle’s derivatives fall into two categories. Derivatives held within Newcastle’s nonrecourse debt structures (primarily CDOs), all of which were liabilities at period end, are not subject to Newcastle’s credit risk as they are senior to all the debt obligations of the related CDO. As a result, no adjustments have been made to the fair value quotations received related to credit risk. Newcastle’s significant derivative counterparties include Bank of America, Deutsche Bank, Wachovia and Credit Suisse.
(F) Assets held within CDOs and other non-recourse structures are not available to satisfy obligations outside of such financings, except to the extent Newcastle receives net cash flow distributions from such structures. Furthermore, our economic losses from such structures cannot exceed Newcastle’s invested equity in them. Therefore, economically, their net book value cannot be less than zero and as a result, the fair value of Newcastle’s net investments in these non-recourse financing structures is equal to the present value of their expected future net cash flows.
(G) Newcastle notes that the unrealized gain on the liabilities within such structures cannot be fully realized.

Valuation Hierarchy

The methodologies used for valuing such instruments have been categorized into three broad levels which form a hierarchy. Newcastle follows this hierarchy for its financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The classifications are based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table summarizes such financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2010:

 

     Principal Balance
or Notional
Amount
   Carrying Value    Fair Value
           Level 2    Level 3A (1)    Level 3B (2)    Total

Assets:

                 

Real estate securities, available for sale:

                 

CMBS

   $ 2,127,595    $ 1,148,351    $ —      $ 1,044,072    $ 104,279    $ 1,148,351

ABS - subprime

     418,268      157,670      —        80,622      77,048      157,670

ABS - other real estate

     83,314      55,909      —        47,819      8,090      55,909

CDO

     78,852      —        —        —        —        —  

FNMA / FHLMC

     4,164      5,329      5,329      —        —        5,329

REIT debt

     394,550      391,973      391,973      —        —        391,973
                                         

Debt security total

     3,106,743      1,759,232      397,302      1,172,513      189,417      1,759,232
                     

Equity securities

        1,112      —        —        5,195      5,195
                                     

Total

      $ 1,760,344    $ 397,302    $ 1,172,513    $ 194,612    $ 1,764,427
                                     

Liabilities:

                 

Interest rate swaps, treated as hedges

     1,775,482      160,736      160,736      —        —        160,736

Non-hedge derivatives

     239,957      24,062      24,062      —        —        24,062

 

(1) Third party pricing sources with significant unobservable inputs.
(2) Internal models with significant unobservable inputs.

 

15


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Newcastle’s investments in instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs changed during the three months ended March 31, 2010 as follows:

 

     Level 3A  
     CMBS     ABS     Equity/Other
Securities
    Total  
     Conduit     Other     Subprime     Other      

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 536,092      $ 397,407      $ 87,883      $ 46,059      $ —        $ 1,067,441   

Transfers (C)

            

Transfers from Level 3B

     —          —          —          —          —          —     

Transfers into Level 3B

     (7,954     (1,206     (10,538     —          —          (19,698

CDO VII Deconsolidation

     (32,858     (3,379     (10,685     —          —          (46,922

Total gains (losses) (A)

            

Included in net income (loss) (B)

     5,614        —          121        —          —          5,735   

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     58,180        41,007        (165     2,624        —          101,646   

Amortization included in interest income

     2,867        1,701        2,710        50        —          7,328   

Purchases, sales and settlements

            

Purchases

     65,855        10,000        23,361        —          —          99,216   

Proceeds from sales

     (25,679     (634     (6,478     —          —          (32,791

Proceeds from repayments

     (2,022     (919     (5,587     (914     —          (9,442
                                                

Balance at March 31, 2010

   $ 600,095      $ 443,977      $ 80,622      $ 47,819      $ —        $ 1,172,513   
                                                
     Level 3B  
     CMBS     ABS     Equity/Other
Securities
    Total  
     Conduit     Other     Subprime     Other      

Balance at December 31, 2009

   $ 95,376      $ 32,744      $ 85,377      $ 10,719      $ 2,620      $ 226,836   

Transfers (C)

            

Transfers from Level 3A

     7,954        1,206        10,538        —          —          19,698   

Transfers into Level 3A

     —          —          —          —          —          —     

CDO VII Deconsolidation

     (48,665     —          (17,890     (457     —          (67,012

Total gains (losses) (A)

            

Included in net income (loss) (B)

     (20,128     (6     (4,651     (2,090     (279     (27,154

Included in other comprehensive income (loss)

     31,325        8,447        7,360        472        2,851        50,455   

Amortization included in interest income

     3,477        95        2,247        181        —          6,000   

Purchases, sales and settlements

            

Purchases

     —          —          —          —          3        3   

Proceeds from sales

     (170     —          —          —          —          (170

Proceeds from repayments

     (7,249     (127     (5,933     (735     —          (14,044
                                                

Balance at March 31, 2010

   $ 61,920      $ 42,359      $ 77,048      $ 8,090      $ 5,195      $ 194,612   
                                                

 

(A) None of the gains (losses) recorded in earnings during the period is attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to Level 3 assets still held at the reporting dates.
(B)

 

     Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010
 
     Level 3A     Level 3B  

Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net

   $ 6,405      $ (82

Other income (loss), net

     —          —     

OTTI

     (670     (27,072
                

Total

   $ 5,735      $ (27,154
                

Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net, from investments transferred into Level 3 during the period

   $ —        $ —     

 

(C) Transfers are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarter.

 

16


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Securities Valuation

As of March 31, 2010, Newcastle’s securities valuation methodology and results are further detailed as follows:

 

     Outstanding
Face
Amount (A)
   Amortized
Cost
Basis (B)
   Fair Value

Asset Type

         Multiple
Quotes (C)
   Single
Quote (D)
   Internal
Pricing
Models (E)
   Total

CMBS

   $ 2,127,595    $ 1,414,657    $ 830,630    $ 213,442    $ 104,279    $ 1,148,351

ABS – subprime

     418,268      166,857      63,345      17,277      77,048      157,670

ABS – other real estate

     83,314      61,628      4,365      43,454      8,090      55,909

FNMA / FHLMC

     4,164      5,271      —        5,329      —        5,329

REIT debt

     394,550      394,396      374,012      17,961      —        391,973

CDO

     78,852      —        —        —        —        —  
                                         

Debt security total

   $ 3,106,743      2,042,809      1,272,352      297,463      189,417      1,759,232
                     

Equity securities

        1,112      —        —        5,195      5,195
                                     

Total

      $ 2,043,921    $ 1,272,352    $ 297,463    $ 194,612      1,764,427
                                     

 

(A) Net of incurred losses.
(B) Net of discounts (or gross of premiums) and after OTTI, including impairment taken during the period ended March 31, 2010.
(C) Management generally obtained pricing service quotations or broker quotations from two sources, one of which was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security). Management selected one of the quotes received as being most representative of fair value and did not use an average of the quotes. Newcastle’s methodology is to not use quotes from selling brokers, unless those quotes are the only marks available, or unless the quotes provided by other (non-selling) brokers are, in management’s judgment, not representative of fair value. Even if Newcastle receives two or more quotes on a particular security that come from non-selling brokers, it does not use an average because management believes using an actual quote more closely represents a transactable price for the security than an average level. Furthermore, in some cases there is a wide disparity between the quotes Newcastle receives. Management believes using an average of the quotes in these cases would generally not represent the fair value of the asset. Based on Newcastle’s own fair value analysis using internal models, management selects one of the quotes which is believed to more accurately reflect fair value. Newcastle never adjusts quotes received.
(D) Management was unable to obtain quotations from more than one source on these securities. The one source was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security) or a pricing service.
(E) Securities whose fair value was estimated based on internal pricing models are further detailed as follows:

 

    Amortized
Cost Basis
  Fair
Value
  Impairment
Recorded
In Current
Year
  Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
in Accumulated
OCI
    Assumption Ranges
            Discount
Rate
 

Prepayment
Speed (F)

 

Cumulative
Default Rate

 

Loss

Severity

CMBS – Conduit

  $ 80,495   $ 61,920   $ 19,691   $ (18,575   20%   N/A   7% - 35%   3% - 27%

CMBS – Large loan / Single borrower

    71,479     42,359     6     (29,120   20% -48%   N/A   0% -100%   0% - 100%

ABS – subprime

    88,345     77,048     5,006     (11,297   15%   1% - 10%   26% - 92%   60% - 100%

ABS – other RE

    9,542     8,090     2,090     (1,452   15%   0% - 8%   36% -73%   55% - 90%

CDO

    —       —       3     —        N/A   N/A   100%   100%
                                 

Debt security total

  $ 249,861   $ 189,417   $ 26,796   $ (60,444        

Equity securities

    1,112     5,195     276     4,083           
                                 

Total

  $ 250,973   $ 194,612   $ 27,072   $ (56,361        
                                 

All of the assumptions listed have some degree of market observability, based on Newcastle’s knowledge of the market, relationships with market participants, and use of common market data sources. Collateral prepayment, default and loss severity projections are in the form of “curves” or “vectors” that vary for each monthly collateral cash flow projection. Methods used to develop these projections vary by asset class (e.g., CMBS projections are developed differently than home equity ABS projections) but conform to industry conventions. Newcastle uses assumptions that generate its best estimate of future cash flows of each respective security.

The prepayment vector specifies the percentage of the collateral balance that is expected to voluntarily pay off at each point in the future. The prepayment vector is based on projections from a widely published investment bank model which considers factors such as collateral FICO score, loan-to-value ratio, debt-to-income ratio, and vintage on a loan level basis. This vector is scaled up or down to match recent collateral-specific prepayment experience, as obtained from remittance reports and market data services.

Loss severities are based on recent collateral-specific experience with additional consideration given to collateral characteristics. Collateral age is taken into consideration because severities tend to initially increase with collateral age before eventually stabilizing. Newcastle typically uses projected severities that are higher than the historic experience for collateral that is relatively new (e.g., 2007 vintage origination) to account for this effect. Collateral characteristics such as loan size, lien position, and location (state) also effect loss severity. Newcastle considers whether a collateral pool has experienced a significant change in its composition with respect to these factors when assigning severity projections.

 

17


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Default rates are determined from the current “pipeline” of loans that are more than 90 days delinquent, in foreclosure, or are real estate owned (REO). These significantly delinquent loans determine the first 24 months of the default vector. Beyond month 24, the default vector transitions to a steady-state value that is generally equal to or greater than that given by the widely published investment bank model.

The discount rates Newcastle uses are derived from a range of observable pricing on securities backed by similar collateral and offered in a live market. As the markets in which Newcastle transacts have become less liquid, Newcastle has had to rely on fewer data points in this analysis.

 

(F) Projected annualized average prepayment rate.

Loan Valuation

Loans which Newcastle does not have the ability to hold into the foreseeable future are classified as held-for-sale. As a result, these held-for-sale loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value and are therefore recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Newcastle recorded ($59.1) million and ($36.7) million of valuation allowance (reversal) on real estate related loans and residential mortgage loans (Note 4), respectively. These loans were written down to fair value at the time of the impairment, based on broker quotations, pricing service quotations or internal pricing models. All the loans were within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For real estate related loans, the most significant inputs used in the valuations are the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, market yields and the estimated collateral value of such loan investments. For residential mortgage loans, significant inputs include management’s expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities and discount rates that market participants would use in determining the fair values of similar pools of residential mortgage loans.

The following tables summarize the fair value information of real estate related loans and residential mortgage loans:

 

     Outstanding
Face
Amount
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Valuation
Allowance/
(Reversal) In
Current Year
    Significant Input Ranges          

Loan Type

              Discount Rate    Loss Severity          

Mezzanine

   $ 717,134    $ 250,066    $ 250,066    $ (13,605   17.5% - 87.1%    0.0% - 100.0%      

Bank Loan

     291,598      207,246      207,262      (23,602   8.2% - 29.8%    0.0% - 51.0%      

B-Note

     308,006      101,452      101,452      (22,101   10.1% - 61.6%    0.0% - 100.0%      

Whole Loan

     56,085      29,124      29,124      216      7.5% - 20.0%    0.0% - 0.0%      
                                        

Loans

   $ 1,372,823    $ 587,888    $ 587,904    $ (59,092           
                                        
     Outstanding
Face
Amount
   Carrying
Value
   Fair
Value
   Valuation
Allowance/
(Reversal) In
Current Year
    Significant Input Ranges

Loan Type

              Discount Rate    Prepayment
Speed
   Cumulative
Default Rate
   Loss
Severity

Residential Loans

   $ 67,694    $ 51,316    $ 51,316    $ 609      4.98% - 9.66%    7% - 30%    0.31% - 5.5%    25% - 30%

Manufactured Housing Loans I

     166,684      135,609      135,609      (17,420   8.40%    3.00%    4.00%    75.0%

Manufactured Housing Loans II

     236,065      221,065      221,065      (19,871   8.40%    4.00%    3.50%    75.0%
                                        

Loans

   $ 470,443    $ 407,990    $ 407,990    $ (36,682           
                                        

Derivatives

Newcastle is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risk managed by Newcastle using derivative instruments is interest rate risk. Newcastle enters into interest rate swap agreements to reduce the impact of fluctuating interest rates on its earnings. Newcastle designates certain interest rate swap agreements as cash flow hedges of its floating rate financings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge (i.e. hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss, and net payments received or made, on the derivative instrument are reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recognized in current earnings during the period of change.

 

18


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

Newcastle’s derivative instruments are valued using counterparty quotations. These quotations are generally based on valuation models with model inputs that can generally be verified and which do not involve significant judgment. The significant observable inputs used in determining the fair value of our Level 2 derivative contracts are contractual cash flows and market based interest rate curves. Newcastle’s derivatives are recorded on its balance sheet as follows:

 

          Fair Value
     Balance sheet location    March 31,
2010
   December 31,
2009

Interest rate swaps, designated as hedges

   Derivative liabilities    $ 160,736    $ 178,037

Interest rate swaps, not designated as hedges

   Derivative liabilities      24,062      29,117
                
      $ 184,798    $ 207,154
                

The following table summarizes information related to derivatives:

 

     March 31,
2010
    December 31,
2009
 

Cash flow hedges

    

Notional amount of interest rate swap agreements

   $ 1,775,482      $ 2,099,435   

Amount of (loss) recognized in OCI on effective portion

     (150,416     (173,683

Deferred hedge gain (loss) related to anticipated financings, which have subsequently occurred, net of amortization

     397        832   

Deferred hedge gain (loss) related to dedesignation, net of amortization

     (6,011     (8,045

Expected reclassification of deferred hedges from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months

     (3,969     (4,234

Expected reclassification of current hedges from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months

     (75,816     (90,666

Non-hedge Derivatives

    

Notional amount of interest rate swap agreements

     239,957        296,243   

The following table summarizes gains (losses) recorded in relation to derivatives:

 

          Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
     Income statement location    2010     2009  

Cash flow hedges

       

Gain (loss) on the ineffective portion

   Other income (loss)    $ (1   $ (828

Gain (loss) immediately recognized at dedesignation

   Other income (loss)      (3,279     (8,797

Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income, related to effective portion

   Interest expense      (25,320     (23,922

Deferred hedge gain reclassified from AOCI into income, related to anticipated financings

   Interest expense      434        25   

Deferred hedge gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income, related to effective portion of dedesignated hedges

   Interest expense      (2,033     (5,466

Non-hedge derivatives gain (loss)

   Other income (loss)      (1,748     3,116   

 

19


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

7. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Newcastle is required to present both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”). Basic EPS is calculated by dividing net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is calculated by dividing net income available for common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding plus the additional dilutive effect of common stock equivalents during each period. Newcastle’s common stock equivalents are its outstanding stock options. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, Newcastle had no dilutive common stock equivalents. Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders is equal to net income (loss) less preferred dividends plus excess of carrying amount of exchanged preferred stock over fair value of consideration paid.

As of March 31, 2010, Newcastle’s outstanding options were summarized as follows:

 

Held by the Manager

   1,686,447

Issued to the Manager and subsequently transferred to certain of the Manager’s employees

   798,162

Held by the independent directors and former directors

   14,000
    

Total

   2,498,609
    

8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation — Newcastle is, from time to time, a defendant in legal actions from transactions conducted in the ordinary course of business. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes the ultimate liability arising from such actions which existed at March 31, 2010, if any, will not materially affect Newcastle’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

Contingent Gain in CDOs — As of March 31, 2010, Newcastle has recorded $706.8 million of losses in its CDOs in excess of its economic exposure which must eventually be reversed through amortization, sales at gains, or as reductions to accumulated deficit at the deconsolidation or termination of the CDOs.

9. RECENT ACTIVITIES

These financial statements include a discussion of material events which have occurred subsequent to March 31, 2010 (referred to as “subsequent events”) through the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. Events subsequent to that date have not been considered in these financial statements.

In March 2010, Newcastle sold $22.8 million face amount of FHLMC securities and repaid the corresponding repurchase agreements in the amount of $22.6 million. Concurrent with the sales, Newcastle terminated the related interest rate swap agreements. As a result, the gain on sale recorded from these assets was offset by the loss on the termination of the derivatives.

On March 23, 2010, Newcastle announced the final results of its offer to exchange (the “Exchange Offer”) shares of its common stock and cash for up to (i) 1,725,000 shares of its outstanding 9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred Stock”), (ii) 1,104,000 shares of its outstanding 8.05% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred Stock”), and (iii) 1,380,000 shares of its outstanding 8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (“Series D Preferred Stock,” and, together with Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”).

On March 25, 2010, Newcastle settled the Exchange Offer. In the aggregate, Newcastle issued 9,091,668 shares of its common stock (approximately 17.2% of Newcastle’s outstanding shares of common stock prior to the issuance of shares in the Exchange Offer). A total of 2,881,694 shares of common stock were issued in exchange for 1,152,679 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, a total of 2,759,989 shares of common stock were issued in exchange for 1,104,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock, and a total of 3,449,985 shares of common stock were issued in exchange for 1,380,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock. The shares of Preferred Stock acquired by Newcastle in the Exchange Offer were retired upon receipt. After settlement of the Exchange Offer, 1,347,321 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, 496,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock and 620,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock remain outstanding for trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The shares of common stock were issued in the Exchange Offer in reliance on the exemption set forth in Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, for securities exchanged by an issuer with its existing security holders exclusively where no commission or other remuneration is paid or given directly or indirectly for soliciting such exchange.

 

20


Table of Contents

NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

MARCH 31, 2010

(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)

 

 

In connection with the Exchange Offer, all of Newcastle’s preferred stock dividends in arrears were paid, and all cumulative preferred stock dividends accrued through April 30, 2010 have been paid. The $43.0 million excess of the $87.5 million carrying value of the exchanged preferred stock over the $44.5 million fair value of consideration paid (which included $28.5 million of common stock and $16.0 million of cash) was recorded as an increase to Net Income (Loss) Applicable to Common Stockholders.

See note 5 regarding the securitization transaction in April 2010 to refinance Newcastle’s Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio I.

In April 2010, Newcastle repaid in full its outstanding repurchase agreements of $12.9 million as of March 31, 2010.

In April 2010, Newcastle, through two of its CDOs, made a cash investment of $75.0 million in a new real estate related loan to a portfolio company of a private equity fund managed by an affiliate of Newcastle’s manager. Newcastle’s chairman is an officer of the borrower. This investment improves the applicable CDOs’ results under some of their respective tests, and is expected to yield approximately 22%. The loan will initially mature in April 2013, with two one-year extensions, and is secured by subordinated interests in the properties of the borrower. Interest on the loan will be accrued and deferred until maturity.

 

21


Table of Contents
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes included herein, and with Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.”

GENERAL

Newcastle Investment Corp. is a real estate investment and finance company. We invest in, and actively manage, a portfolio of real estate securities, loans and other real estate related assets. Our objective is to maximize the difference between the yield on our investments and the cost of financing these investments while hedging our interest rate risk. We emphasize portfolio management, asset quality, liquidity, diversification, match funded financing and credit risk management.

We currently own a diversified portfolio of credit sensitive real estate debt investments, including securities and loans. Our portfolio of real estate securities includes commercial mortgage backed securities (CMBS), senior unsecured debt issued by REITs, real estate related asset backed securities (ABS), and FNMA/FHLMC securities. Mortgage backed securities are interests in or obligations secured by pools of mortgage loans. We generally target investments rated A through BB, except for our FNMA/FHLMC securities which have an implied AAA rating. We also own, directly and indirectly, interests in loans and pools of loans, including real estate related loans, commercial mortgage loans, residential mortgage loans, manufactured housing loans, and subprime mortgage loans.

We employ leverage as part of our investment strategy. We do not have a predetermined target debt to equity ratio as we believe the appropriate leverage for the particular assets we are financing depends on the credit quality of those assets. As a result of our negative GAAP equity, our GAAP debt to equity ratio is not a meaningful measure as of March 31, 2010. Our general investment guidelines adopted by our board of directors limit total leverage (as defined under the governing documents) to a maximum 9.0 to 1 debt to equity ratio. As of March 31, 2010, our debt to equity ratio, as computed under this method, was approximately 4.0 to 1.0. We utilize leverage for the sole purpose of financing our portfolio and not for the purpose of speculating on changes in interest rates.

We strive to maintain access to a broad array of capital resources in an effort to insulate our business from potential fluctuations in the availability of capital. We seek to utilize multiple forms of financing including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), other securitizations, term loans, and trust preferred securities, as well as short term financing in the form of loans and repurchase agreements. As we discuss in more detail under “–Market Considerations” below, the continued challenging credit and liquidity conditions have limited the array of capital resources available to us and made the terms of capital resources we are able to obtain generally less favorable to us relative to the terms we were able to obtain prior to the onset of challenging conditions. However, credit and liquidity conditions have continued to improve during 2010, and, as a result, we have recently been able to access more types of capital – and on better terms than we had been able to access during 2008 and 2009.

We seek to match fund our investments with respect to interest rates and maturities in order to reduce the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and reduce the risk of refinancing our liabilities prior to the maturity of the investments. We seek to finance a substantial portion of our real estate securities and loans through the issuance of term debt, which generally represents obligations issued in multiple classes secured by an underlying portfolio of assets. Specifically, our CDO financings offer us the structural flexibility to buy and sell certain investments to manage risk and, subject to certain limitations, to optimize returns.

We conduct our business through four primary segments: (i) investments financed with non-recourse collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), (ii) investments financed with other non-recourse debt, (iii) investments financed with recourse debt, including FNMA / FHLMC securities, and (iv) unlevered investments. Revenues attributable to each segment are disclosed below (in thousands).

 

For the Three Months

Ended March 31,

   CDOs    Other
Non-Recourse
   Recourse    Unlevered    Unallocated    Total

2010

   $ 50,943    $ 18,046    $ 859    $ 223    $ 21    $ 70,092

2009

   $ 100,763    $ 20,342    $ 2,518    $ 829    $ 21    $ 124,473

Market Considerations

Financial Markets in which We Operate

Our ability to generate income is dependent on our ability to invest our capital on a timely basis at attractive levels. The two primary market factors that affect this ability are (1) credit spreads and (2) the availability of financing on favorable terms.

 

22


Table of Contents

Generally speaking, widening credit spreads reduce any unrealized gains on our current investments (or cause or increase unrealized losses) and increase our costs for new financings, but increase the yields available on potential new investments, while tightening credit spreads increase the unrealized gains (or reduce unrealized losses) on our current investments and reduce our costs for new financings, but reduce the yields available on potential new investments. By reducing unrealized gains (or causing unrealized losses), widening credit spreads also impact our ability to realize gains on existing investments if we were to sell such assets.

During the first three months of 2010, credit spreads tightened. This tightening of credit spreads caused the net unrealized losses on our securities to decrease.

Despite signs of improvement, market conditions remain significantly challenging, and we do not know how recent changes in market conditions will affect our business.

Liquidity

Credit and liquidity conditions have continued to improve in 2010, but such conditions are still less favorable than those we experienced prior to 2007. The continued challenging credit and liquidity conditions have adversely affected us and the markets in which we operate in a number of other ways. For example, they have reduced the market trading activity for many real estate securities and loans, resulting in less liquid markets for those securities and loans. As the securities held by us and many other companies in our industry are marked to market at the end of each quarter, the decreased liquidity and concern over market conditions have resulted in significant reductions in mark to market valuations of many real estate securities and loans and the collateral underlying them. These lower valuations, and decreased expectations of future cash flows, have affected us by, among other things:

 

   

decreasing our net book value;

 

   

contributing to our decision to record significant impairment charges;

 

   

prompting us to negotiate the removal of certain financial covenants from our non-CDO financings;

 

   

reducing the amount, which we refer to as cushion, by which we satisfy the over collateralization and interest coverage tests of our CDOs (sometimes referred to as CDO “triggers”) or contributing to several of our CDOs failing their over collateralization tests (see “– Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “– Debt Obligations” below); and

 

   

requiring us to pay additional amounts under certain financing arrangements.

In some cases, we have sold, and may continue to sell, assets at prices below what we believed to be their value in order to meet liquidity requirements under certain financing arrangements. Failed CDO triggers, impairments resulting from incurred losses, and asset sales made at prices significantly below face amount while the related debt is being repaid at its full face amount, as well as the retention of cash, further contribute to reductions in future earnings, cash flow and liquidity. As a result, we expect that our future cash flow from operations will be significantly reduced relative to previous periods.

In order to maintain liquidity, we have elected not to declare any common dividends since the third quarter of 2008. We may elect to adjust or not to pay any future dividend payments to reflect our current and expected cash from operations or to satisfy future liquidity needs.

In addition, we note that the recent reduction in the number of financial institutions has impacted our liquidity options and sources of capital. The consolidation or elimination of Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns and several other counterparties has increased our concentration of counterparty risk, decreased the universe of potential counterparties and reduced our ability to obtain competitive financing rates and terms. For a more detailed discussion of our counterparty default and concentration risk, see Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Financial Services Industry and Financial Markets – We are subject to counterparty default and concentration risk.”

Extent of Market Disruption

We do not currently know the full extent to which this market disruption will affect us or the markets in which we operate, and we are unable to predict its length or ultimate severity. If the disruption continues, particularly with respect to commercial real estate, we will likely experience additional impairment charges, potential reductions in cash flows from our investments and additional challenges in raising capital and obtaining investment financing on attractive terms. Moreover, we will likely need to continue to place a high priority on managing our liquidity. If we raised capital or issued unsecured debt in the current market, it could be significantly dilutive to our current shareholders. Certain aspects of these effects are more fully described in Part I, Item 2, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Interest Rate, Credit and Spread Risk” and “– Liquidity and Capital Resources” as well as in Part I, Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

 

23


Table of Contents

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions that could affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management believes that the estimates and assumptions utilized in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements are prudent and reasonable. Actual results have been in line with management’s estimates and judgments used in applying each of the accounting policies described below, as modified periodically to reflect current market conditions. The following is a summary of our accounting policies that are most effected by judgments, estimates and assumptions.

Variable Interest Entities

Variable interest entities (“VIEs”) are defined as entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The guidance for consolidating a VIE was changed effective January 1, 2010. A VIE is now required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary, and only by its primary beneficiary, which is defined as the party who has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and who has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

The VIEs in which we have a significant interest include (i) our CDOs, (ii) our subprime securitizations, and (iii) our manufactured housing loan financing structures. Our CDOs were all consolidated under prior guidance; however, under current guidance we do not have the power to direct the relevant activities of CDO VII, as a result of the event of default which allows us to be removed as collateral manager of CDO VII and prevents us from purchasing or selling collateral within CDO VII, and therefore we have deconsolidated CDO VII as of January 1, 2010. Similar events of default in the future, if they occur, could cause us to deconsolidate additional financing structures. Our subprime securitizations were not consolidated under prior guidance and are still not consolidated under current guidance since we do not have the power to direct the relevant activities of these entities. Our manufactured housing loan financing structures were both consolidated under prior guidance and continue to be consolidated under the new guidance. However, as discussed in “- Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Obligations”, we completed a securitization transaction to refinance our Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio I. We are currently evaluating whether we will consolidate the new securitization financing structure.

In addition, our investments in securities may be deemed to be variable interests in VIEs, depending on their structure. We monitor these investments and, to the extent we determine we potentially control the current controlling class of securities, analyze them for potential consolidation. As of March 31, 2010, we did not control the current controlling class of any of these securitizations.

We will continue to analyze future investments, as well as reconsideration events in existing entities, pursuant to the VIE requirements. These analyses require considerable judgment in determining the primary beneficiary of a VIE since they involve subjective determinations of significance, with respect to both power and economics. The result could be the consolidation of an entity that would otherwise not have been consolidated or the non-consolidation of an entity that would otherwise have been consolidated.

Valuation and Impairment of Securities

We have classified all our real estate securities as available for sale. As such, they are carried at fair value with net unrealized gains or losses reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income, to the extent impairment losses are considered temporary as described below. Fair value may be based upon the sources described above, counterparty quotations or pricing services quotations, which provide valuation estimates based upon reasonable market order indications or a good faith estimate thereof and are subject to significant variability based on market conditions, such as interest rates, credit spreads and market liquidity. A significant portion of our securities are currently not traded in active markets and therefore have little or no price transparency. For a further discussion of this trend, see “– Market Considerations” above. As a result, we have estimated the fair value of these illiquid securities based on internal pricing models rather than the sources described above. The determination of estimated cash flows used in pricing models is inherently subjective and imprecise. Changes in market conditions, as well as changes in the assumptions or methodology used to determine fair value, could result in a significant and immediate increase or decrease in our book equity. For securities valued with pricing models, these inputs include the discount rate, assumptions relating to prepayments, default rates and loss severities, as well as other variables.

See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for information regarding the fair value of our investments, and its estimation methodology, as of March 31, 2010.

 

24


Table of Contents

Our estimation of the fair value of level 3B assets (as described below) involves significant judgment. Changes in market conditions, as well as changes in the assumptions or methodology used to determine fair value, could result in a significant increase or decrease in our book equity. We validated the inputs and outputs of our models by comparing them to available independent third party market parameters and models for reasonableness. We believe the assumptions we used are within the range that a market participant would use and factor in the slight improvement in liquidity currently in the markets. In the first quarter of 2010, the inputs to our models for the overall portfolio have generally remained consistent with the assumptions used at year-end, other than certain modifications we have made to the assumptions to reflect conditions relevant to specific assets.

For debt securities valued with internal models, which have an aggregate fair value of $189.4 million as of March 31, 2010, a 10% unfavorable change in our assumptions would result in the following decreases in such aggregate fair value:

 

     CMBS     ABS  

Outstanding face amount

   $ 708,949      $ 355,646   

Fair value

   $ 104,279      $ 85,138   

Effect on fair value with 10% unfavorable change in:

    

Discount rate

   $ (3,655   $ (3,543

Prepayment rate

     N/A      $ (1,090

Default rate

   $ (18,863   $ (5,811

Loss severity

   $ (14,888   $ (11,485

The sensitivity analysis is hypothetical and should be used with caution. In particular, the results are calculated by stressing a particular economic assumption independent of changes in any other assumption; in practice, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might counteract or amplify the sensitivities. Also, changes in the fair value based on a 10% variation in an assumption generally may not be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear.

Our securities must be categorized by the “level” of inputs used in estimating their fair values. Level 1 would be assets valued based on quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets. We have no level 1 assets. Level 2 would be assets valued based on quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, on quoted prices in less active or inactive markets, or on other “observable” market inputs. Level 3 would be assets valued based significantly on “unobservable” market inputs. We have further broken level 3 into level 3A, third party indications, and level 3B, internal models. Fair value under GAAP represents an exit price in the normal course of business, not a forced liquidation price. If we were forced to sell assets in a short period to meet liquidity needs, the prices we receive could be substantially less than the recorded fair values.

We generally classify the broker and pricing service quotations we receive as level 3A inputs, except for certain liquid securities. They are quoted prices in generally inactive and illiquid markets for identical or similar securities. These quotations are generally received via email and contain disclaimers which state that they are “indicative” and not “actionable” – meaning that the party giving the quotation is not bound to actually purchase the security at the quoted price. These quotations are generally based on models prepared by the brokers and we have little visibility into the inputs they use. Based on procedures we have performed with respect to prior quotations received from these brokers in comparison to the outputs generated from our internal pricing models and transactions we have completed with respect to these securities, as well as on our knowledge and experience of these markets, we have generally determined that these quotes represent a reasonable estimate of fair value. In addition, management performs its own quarterly analysis of fair value, based on internal pricing models, to confirm that each of the quotations received represented a reasonable estimate of fair value as defined under GAAP. For the $1.5 billion carrying value of securities valued using quotations, a 100 basis point change in credit spreads would impact estimated fair value at period and by approximately $43.0 million.

We must also assess whether unrealized losses on securities, if any, reflect a decline in value which is other-than-temporary and, if so, write the impaired security down to its fair value through earnings. A decline in value is deemed to be other-than-temporary if (i) it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of a security which was not impaired at acquisition (there is an expected credit loss), or (ii) if we have the intent to sell a security in an unrealized loss position or it is more likely than not we will be required to sell a security in an unrealized loss position prior to its anticipated recovery (if any). For the purposes of performing this analysis, we assume the anticipated recovery period is until the respective security’s expected maturity. Also, for certain securities which represent “beneficial interests in securitized financial assets,” whenever there is a probable adverse change in the timing or amounts of estimated cash flows of a security from the cash flows previously projected, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred. These securities are also analyzed for other-than-temporary impairment under the guidelines applicable to all securities as described herein. We note that primarily all of our securities, except our FNMA/FHLMC securities, fall within the definition of beneficial interests in securitized financial assets.

Temporary declines in value generally result from changes in market factors, such as market interest rates and credit spreads, or from certain macroeconomic events, including market disruptions and supply changes, which do not directly impact our ability to collect amounts contractually due. We continually evaluate the credit status of each of our securities and the collateral supporting our securities. This evaluation includes a review of the credit of the issuer of the security (if applicable), the credit

 

25


Table of Contents

rating of the security, the key terms of the security (including credit support), debt service coverage and loan to value ratios, the performance of the pool of underlying loans and the estimated value of the collateral supporting such loans, including the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends and factors. These factors include loan default expectations and loss severities, which are analyzed in connection with a particular security’s credit support, as well as prepayment rates. These factors are also analyzed in relation to the amount of the unrealized loss and the period elapsed since it was incurred. The result of this evaluation is considered when determining management’s estimate of cash flows, particularly with respect to developing the necessary inputs and assumptions. Each security is impacted by different factors and in different ways; generally the more negative factors which are identified with respect to a given security, the more likely we are to determine that we do not expect to receive all contractual payments when due with respect to that security. Significant judgment is required in this analysis.

During the three months ended March 31, 2010, we had 48, or $141.7 million carrying amount of, securities that were downgraded and recorded a net other-than-temporary impairment charge of $21.8 million on these securities in 2010. However, we do not depend on credit ratings in underwriting our securities, either at acquisition or on an ongoing basis. As mentioned above, a credit rating downgrade is one factor that we monitor and consider in our analysis regarding other-than-temporary impairment, however it is not determinative. Our securities generally benefit from the support of one or more subordinate classes of securities or equity or other forms of credit support. Therefore, credit rating downgrades, even to the extent they relate to an expectation that a securitization we have invested in, on an overall basis, has credit issues, may not ultimately impact cash flow estimates for the class of securities in which we are invested.

Furthermore, the analysis of whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell securities in an unrealized loss position prior to an expected recovery in value (if any), the amount of such expected required sales, and the projected identification of which securities would be sold is also be subject to significant judgment, particularly in times of market illiquidity such as we are currently experiencing.

Revenue Recognition on Securities

Income on these securities is recognized using a level yield methodology based upon a number of cash flow assumptions that are subject to uncertainties and contingencies. Such assumptions include the rate and timing of principal and interest receipts (which may be subject to prepayments and defaults). These assumptions are updated on at least a quarterly basis to reflect changes related to a particular security, actual historical data, and market changes. These uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and are subject to future events, and economic and market conditions, which may alter the assumptions. For securities acquired at a discount for credit losses, the net income recognized is based on a “loss adjusted yield” whereby a gross interest yield is recorded to Interest Income, offset by a provision for probable, incurred credit losses which is accrued on a periodic basis to Provision for Credit Losses on Loan Pools. The provision is determined based on an evaluation of the credit status of securities, as described in connection with the analysis of impairment above.

Valuation of Derivatives

Similarly, our derivative instruments are carried at fair value. Fair value is based on counterparty quotations. Newcastle reports the fair value of derivative instruments gross of cash paid or received pursuant to credit support agreements and fair value is reflected on a net by counterparty basis when Newcastle believes a legal right of offset exists under an enforceable netting agreement. To the extent they qualify as cash flow hedges, net unrealized gains or losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income; otherwise, they are reported currently in income. To the extent they qualify as fair value hedges, net unrealized gains or losses on both the derivative and the related portion of the hedged item are reported currently in income. Fair values of such derivatives are subject to significant variability based on many of the same factors as the securities discussed above, including counterparty credit risk. The results of such variability could be a significant increase or decrease in our GAAP equity and/or earnings.

Impairment of Loans

We own, directly and indirectly, real estate related, commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans, including manufactured housing loans and subprime mortgage loans. We must periodically evaluate each of these loans or loan pools for possible impairment. Impairment is indicated when it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan, or, for loans acquired at a discount for credit losses, when it is deemed probable that we will be unable to collect as anticipated. Upon determination of impairment, we would establish a specific valuation allowance with a corresponding charge to earnings. We continually evaluate our loans receivable for impairment. Our residential mortgage loans, including manufactured housing loans, are aggregated into pools for evaluation based on like characteristics, such as loan type and acquisition date. Individual loans are evaluated based on an analysis of the borrower’s performance, the credit rating of the borrower, debt service coverage and loan to value ratios, the estimated value of the underlying collateral, the key terms of the loan, and the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends and factors. Pools of loans are also evaluated based on similar criteria, including historical and anticipated trends in defaults and loss severities for the type and seasoning of loans being evaluated. This information is used to estimate specific impairment charges on individual loans as well as provisions for estimated unidentified incurred losses on pools of loans. Significant judgment is required both in determining impairment and in estimating the resulting loss allowance. Furthermore, we must assess our intent and ability to hold our loan investments on a periodic basis. If we do not have the intent to hold a loan for the foreseeable future or until its expected payoff, the loan must be classified as “held for sale” and recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value.

 

26


Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition on Loans Held for Investment

Income on these loans is recognized similarly to that on our securities and is subject to similar uncertainties and contingencies, which are also analyzed on at least a quarterly basis. For loan pools acquired at a discount for credit losses, the net income recognized is based on a “loss adjusted yield” whereby a gross interest yield is recorded to Interest Income, offset by a provision for probable, incurred credit losses which is accrued on a periodic basis to Provision for Credit Losses. The provision is determined based on an evaluation of the loans as described under “Impairment of Loans” above.

Revenue Recognition on Loans Held for Sale

Real estate related, commercial mortgage and residential mortgage loans that are considered held for sale are carried at the lower of amortized cost or market value determined on either an individual method basis, or in the aggregate for pools of similar loans. Interest income is recognized to the extent cash is received whereas a change in the market value of loans, to the extent that the value is not above the cost basis, is recorded in Valuation Allowance.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance on transfers of financial assets which eliminates the concept of qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs), changes the requirements for reporting a transfer of a portion of financial assets as a sale, clarifies other sale accounting criteria and changes the initial measurement of a transferor’s interest in transferred financial assets. Furthermore, it requires additional disclosures. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance which changes the definition of a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and changes the methodology to determine who is the primary beneficiary of, or in other words who consolidates, a VIE. Furthermore, it eliminates the scope exception for qualified special purpose entities (QSPEs), which are now subject to the VIE consolidation rules. This guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Generally, the changes are expected to cause more entities to be defined as VIEs and to require consolidation by the entity that exercises day-to-day control over a VIE, such as servicers and collateral managers. As discussed under “Variable Interest Entities” above, this guidance resulted in changes in our consolidated entities. Changes to consolidation conclusions impact our gross assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses but are not material to the net income applicable to our common stockholders.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes the changes in our results of operations from the three months ended March 31, 2009 to the three months ended March 31, 2010 (dollars in thousands):

 

     Three Months    

Explanations of
Material

Changes

 
     Amount Change     Percent Change    
        

Interest income

   $ (54,381   (43.7 %)    (1

Interest expense

     (14,955   (24.7 %)    (1

Valuation allowance (reversal) on loans

     (216,662   N.M.      (2

Other-than-temporary impairment on securities, net

     (158,840   N.M.      (3

Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net

     17,724      N.M.      (4

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt

     21,501      N.M.      (5

Other income (loss), net

     4,929      N.M.      (6

Equity in earnings of equity method investees

     72      553.8   (7

Loan and security servicing expense

     (367   (26.2 %)    (8

General and administrative expense

     1,412      86.8   (9

Management fee to affiliate

     (14   (0.3 %)    (10

Depreciation and amortization

     (9   (12.5 %)    N/A   
                

Income (loss) from continuing operations

   $ 379,280      158.8  
                

N.M.—Not meaningful

 

27


Table of Contents
(1) Changes in interest income and expense are primarily related to our acquisition and disposition during these periods of interest bearing assets and related financings, as follows:

 

     Three Months  
     Period to Period  Increase
(Decrease)
 
     Interest Income     Interest Expense  

Disposition of securities and loans

   $ (426   $ (261

Deconsolidation of VIE

     (7,995     (4,936

Paydowns

     (2,767     (766

Amortization of deferred hedge loss

     —          (3,842

Other (see below)

     (43,193     (5,150
                
   $ (54,381   $ (14,955
                

The change in the amortization of deferred hedge loss is the result of the dedesignation of certain interest rate swaps in one of the manufactured housing loan pools in early 2009.

The change in Other – Interest Income is primarily due to interest income recorded in 2009 as a result of the accretion of discounts on the impaired securities. Changes in the remaining Other are primarily due to changes in interest rates.

 

(2) The change is primarily the result of increase in fair values of the real estate related loans and the manufactured housing loan pools for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
(3) The change is due to the impairment charges recorded to write down a significant portion of our securities portfolio in the first quarter of 2009 as we were not able to express the intent and ability to hold our investments through maturity or recovery.
(4) The change is a result of the net gain or loss on the sale of securities, loans and termination of derivatives. The increase in net gain recorded in the first quarter of 2010 is predominantly the result of the sale of securities at a gain, partially offset by the loss on sales of certain securities and termination of certain interest rate swap agreements at a loss.
(5) The change is a result of the increased gain on the repurchase of our own debt.
(6) The change is primarily due to an unrealized loss recorded through earnings upon the de-designation of certain interest rate swaps as accounting hedges in the first quarter of 2009.
(7) The change is due to an increase in earnings for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 from our operating real estate joint venture which owns a pool of franchise loans.
(8) Changes in loan and security servicing expense are primarily due to dispositions and paydowns.
(9) The change is primarily due to an increase in legal and professional fees incurred in connection with (i) the exchange offer on our preferred stocks, as described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Preferred Stock” below, and (ii) the exchange of $52.1 million of our junior subordinated notes in the first quarter of 2010, as described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources – Debt Obligations” below.
(10) The change is due to a decrease in management fee paying equity as a result of the exchange of preferred stock. As a result of impairment charges, we will not incur incentive compensation to our manager for an indefinite period of time.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Overview

Liquidity is a measurement of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including ongoing commitments to repay borrowings, fund and maintain investments, and other general business needs. Additionally, to maintain our status as a REIT under the Code, we must distribute annually at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. We note that up to 90% of this requirement may be met in future years through stock dividends, rather than cash, subject to limitations based on the value of our stock. Our primary sources of funds for liquidity consist of net cash provided by operating activities, sales or repayments of investments, potential refinancing of existing debt and the issuance of equity securities, when feasible. Our debt obligations are generally secured directly by our investment assets, except for the junior subordinated notes payable.

Sources of Liquidity and Uses of Capital

As of the date of this filing, we currently have sufficient cash on hand to satisfy all of our non-agency recourse liabilities (excluding our junior subordinated notes payable, which are long-term obligations). With respect to the next twelve months, we expect that our cash on hand combined with our cash flow provided by operations will be sufficient to satisfy our anticipated

 

28


Table of Contents

liquidity needs with respect to our current investment portfolio, including related financings, hedges, potential margin calls and operating expenses. While it is inherently more difficult to forecast beyond the next twelve months, we currently expect to meet our long term liquidity requirements, specifically the repayment of our recourse debt obligations, through our cash on hand and, if needed, additional borrowings, proceeds received from repurchase agreements and similar financings, and the liquidation or refinancing of our assets.

These short-term and long-term expectations are forward-looking and subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions, which are described below under “–Factors That Could Impact Our Liquidity” as well as Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” If

our assumptions about our liquidity prove to be incorrect, we could be subject to a shortfall in liquidity in the future, and this short-fall may occur rapidly and with little or no notice, which would limit our ability to address the shortfall on a timely basis.

Cash flow provided by operations constitutes a critical component of our liquidity. Essentially, our cash flow provided by operations is equal to (i) the net cash flow from our CDOs that have not failed their over collateralization or interest coverage tests, plus (ii) the net cash flow from our non-CDO investments that are not subject to mandatory debt repayment, including principal and sales proceeds, less (iii) operating expenses (primarily management fees, professional fees and insurance), and less (iv) interest on the junior subordinated notes payable.