UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
S
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
or
£
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from __________ to _________________________
Commission File Number: 001-31458
Newcastle Investment Corp. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
Maryland | 81-0559116 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY | 10105 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 798-6100 |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes S No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
S Yes No £
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer £ | Accelerated filer S | Non-accelerated filer £ | (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company £ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes £ No S
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the last practicable date.
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share: 172,518,733 shares outstanding as of October 26, 2012.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the operating performance of our investments, the stability of our earnings, and our financing needs. Forward-looking statements are generally identifiable by use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “potential,” “intend,” “expect,” “endeavor,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “overestimate,” “underestimate,” “believe,” “could,” “project,” “predict,” “continue” or other similar words or expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions, discuss future expectations, describe future plans and strategies, contain projections of results of operations or of financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Our ability to predict results or the actual outcome of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Factors which could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to:
| reductions in cash flows received from our investments; | |
• | our ability to take advantage of opportunities in additional asset classes or types of assets, including, without limitation, senior living facilities, at attractive risk-adjusted prices or at all; | |
• | our ability to take advantage of investment opportunities in interests in excess mortgage servicing rights (“Excess MSRs”); | |
• | our ability to deploy capital accretively; | |
• | the risks that default and recovery rates on our real estate securities and loan portfolios deteriorate compared to our underwriting estimates; | |
• | changes in prepayment rates on the loans underlying certain of our assets, including, but not limited to, our Excess MSRs; | |
• | the risk that projected recapture rates on the portfolios underlying our Excess MSRs are not achieved, or that other assumptions underlying our projected returns prove to be incorrect; | |
• | the relationship between yields on assets which are paid off and yields on assets in which such monies can be reinvested; | |
• | the relative spreads between the yield on the assets we invest in and the cost of financing; | |
• | changes in economic conditions generally and the real estate and debt securities markets specifically; | |
• | adverse changes in the financing markets we access affecting our ability to finance our investments, or in a manner that maintains our historic net spreads; | |
• | changing risk assessments by lenders that potentially lead to increased margin calls, not extending our repurchase agreements or other financings in accordance with their current terms or entering into new financings with us; | |
• | changes in interest rates and/or credit spreads, as well as the success of any hedging strategy we may undertake in relation to such changes; | |
• | the quality and size of the investment pipeline and the rate at which we can invest our cash, including cash inside our collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”); | |
• | impairments in the value of the collateral underlying our investments and the relation of any such impairments to our judgments as to whether changes in the market value of our securities, loans or real estate are temporary or not and whether circumstances bearing on the value of such assets warrant changes in carrying values; | |
• | legislative/regulatory changes, including but not limited to, any modification of the terms of loans; | |
• | the availability and cost of capital for future investments; | |
• | competition within the finance and real estate industries; and | |
• | other risks detailed from time to time below, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors,” and in our other reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). |
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. The factors noted above could cause our actual results to differ significantly from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of these forward-looking statements, which reflect our management’s views only as of the date of this report. We are under no duty to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this report to conform these statements to actual results.
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING EXHIBITS
In reviewing the agreements included as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, please remember they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the other parties to the applicable agreement and:
• | should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements provide to be inaccurate; | |
• | have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement; | |
• | may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and | |
• | were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments. |
Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.
The Company acknowledges that, notwithstanding the inclusion of the foregoing cautionary statements, it is responsible for considering whether additional specific disclosures of material information regarding material contractual provisions are required to make the statements in this report not misleading.
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP.
FORM 10-Q
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||
(Unaudited) | December 31, 2011 | |||||||
Assets | ||||||||
Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures | ||||||||
Real estate securities, available-for-sale | $ | 591,929 | $ | 1,479,214 | ||||
Real estate related loans, held-for-sale, net | 832,885 | 807,214 | ||||||
Residential mortgage loans, held-for-investment, net | 301,370 | 331,236 | ||||||
Subprime mortgage loans subject to call option | 405,525 | 404,723 | ||||||
Operating real estate, held-for-sale | 7,839 | 7,741 | ||||||
Other investments | 18,883 | 18,883 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 2,829 | 105,040 | ||||||
Derivative assets | — | 1,954 | ||||||
Receivables and other assets | 6,432 | 23,319 | ||||||
2,167,692 | 3,179,324 | |||||||
Recourse Financing Structures, Mortgaged Real Estate and Unlevered Assets | ||||||||
Real estate securities, available-for-sale | 788,431 | 252,530 | ||||||
Real estate related loans, held-for-sale, net | 9,418 | 6,366 | ||||||
Residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | 2,566 | 2,687 | ||||||
Investments in excess mortgage servicing rights at fair value | 258,347 | 43,971 | ||||||
Investments in real estate, net of accumulated depreciation | 126,798 | — | ||||||
Resident lease intangibles, net of accumulated amortization | 14,755 | — | ||||||
Other investments | 6,024 | 6,024 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 229,036 | 157,356 | ||||||
Derivative assets | 224 | — | ||||||
Receivables and other assets | 33,571 | 3,541 | ||||||
1,469,170 | 472,475 | |||||||
$ | 3,636,862 | $ | 3,651,799 | |||||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||
Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures | ||||||||
CDO bonds payable | $ | 1,155,080 | $ | 2,403,605 | ||||
Other bonds and notes payable | 197,583 | 200,377 | ||||||
Repurchase agreements | 5,368 | 6,546 | ||||||
Financing of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option | 405,525 | 404,723 | ||||||
Derivative liabilities | 36,519 | 119,320 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 8,241 | 16,112 | ||||||
1,808,316 | 3,150,683 | |||||||
Recourse Financing Structures, Mortgages and Other Liabilities | ||||||||
Repurchase agreements | 599,959 | 233,194 | ||||||
Mortgage notes payable | 88,400 | — | ||||||
Junior subordinated notes payable | 51,245 | 51,248 | ||||||
Dividends payable | 38,877 | 16,707 | ||||||
Due to affiliates | 3,351 | 1,659 | ||||||
Purchase price payable on investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | 3,250 | 3,250 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 9,278 | 2,969 | ||||||
794,360 | 309,027 | |||||||
2,602,676 | 3,459,710 | |||||||
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 1,347,321 shares of 9.75% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 496,000 shares of 8.05% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, and 620,000 shares of 8.375% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25.00 per share, issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 | 61,583 | 61,583 | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 172,487,757 and 105,181,009 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively | 1,725 | 1,052 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 1,709,905 | 1,275,792 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (788,725 | ) | (1,073,252 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) | 49,698 | (73,086 | ) | |||||
1,034,186 | 192,089 | |||||||
$ | 3,636,862 | $ | 3,651,799 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
|
1 |
|
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except share data)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 82,850 | $ | 72,393 | $ | 240,187 | $ | 218,739 | ||||||||
Interest expense | 28,411 | 32,587 | 88,038 | 106,502 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income | 54,439 | 39,806 | 152,149 | 112,237 | ||||||||||||
Impairment/(Reversal) | ||||||||||||||||
Valuation allowance (reversal) on loans | 4,094 | 17,644 | (8,160 | ) | (38,218 | ) | ||||||||||
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities | (236 | ) | 5,537 | 16,506 | 14,433 | |||||||||||
Portion of other-than-temporary impairment on securities recognized in other comprehensive income (loss), net of the reversal of other comprehensive loss into net income (loss) | 1,156 | (1,531 | ) | (1,913 | ) | (838 | ) | |||||||||
5,014 | 21,650 | 6,433 | (24,623 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after impairment/reversal | 49,425 | 18,156 | 145,716 | 136,860 | ||||||||||||
Other Revenues | ||||||||||||||||
Rental income | 6,137 | — | 6,137 | — | ||||||||||||
Care and ancillary income | 1,411 | — | 1,411 | — | ||||||||||||
Total other revenues | 7,548 | — | 7,548 | — | ||||||||||||
Other Income (Loss) | ||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net | 229,239 | 5,636 | 232,885 | 75,334 | ||||||||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt | 2,345 | 15,917 | 23,127 | 60,402 | ||||||||||||
Change in fair value of investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | 1,774 | — | 6,513 | — | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss), net | 2,424 | (2,751 | ) | 1,650 | (12,576 | ) | ||||||||||
235,782 | 18,802 | 264,175 | 123,160 | |||||||||||||
Expenses | ||||||||||||||||
Loan and security servicing expense | 1,054 | 1,198 | 3,256 | 3,458 | ||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | 4,742 | — | 4,742 | — | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expense | 4,703 | 1,399 | 13,193 | 4,649 | ||||||||||||
Management fee to affiliate | 6,852 | 4,569 | 17,459 | 13,313 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,370 | — | 2,370 | — | ||||||||||||
19,721 | 7,166 | 41,020 | 21,420 | |||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations | 273,034 | 29,792 | 376,419 | 238,600 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | 187 | 151 | 712 | 151 | ||||||||||||
Net Income | 273,221 | 29,943 | 377,131 | 238,751 | ||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | (1,395 | ) | (1,395 | ) | (4,185 | ) | (4,185 | ) | ||||||||
Income Available for Common Stockholders | $ | 271,826 | $ | 28,548 | $ | 372,946 | $ | 234,566 | ||||||||
Income Per Share of Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.65 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 2.77 | $ | 3.16 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.63 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 2.74 | $ | 3.16 | ||||||||
Income from continuing operations per share of common stock, after preferred dividends | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 1.65 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 2.77 | $ | 3.16 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 1.63 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 2.74 | $ | 3.16 | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations per share of common stock | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Weighted Average Number of Shares of Common Stock Outstanding | ||||||||||||||||
Basic | 164,237,757 | 80,425,197 | 134,619,858 | 74,168,573 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 166,429,120 | 80,441,593 | 135,869,332 | 74,177,027 | ||||||||||||
Dividends Declared per Share of Common Stock | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.62 | $ | 0.25 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
2 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Net income | $ | 273,221 | $ | 29,943 | $ | 377,131 | $ | 238,751 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): | ||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on securities | 55,320 | (118,326 | ) | 121,609 | (16,579 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification of net realized (gain) loss on securities into earnings | (4,002 | ) | (1,605 | ) | 4,411 | (59,928 | ) | |||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | 4,742 | (6,651 | ) | 16,974 | 6,424 | |||||||||||
Reclassification of net realized (gain) loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges into earnings | (321 | ) | 670 | 5,304 | 12,835 | |||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | 55,739 | (125,912 | ) | 148,298 | (57,248 | ) | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive income | $ | 328,960 | $ | (95,969 | ) | $ | 525,429 | $ | 181,503 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
3 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Unaudited)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in thousands)
Preferred Stock | Common Stock | Additional Paid-in | Accumulated | Accum. Other Comp. Income | Total Stock-holders’ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Shares | Amount | Capital | Deficit | (Loss) | Equity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity - December 31, 2011 | 2,463,321 | $ | 61,583 | 105,181,009 | $ | 1,052 | $ | 1,275,792 | $ | (1,073,252 | ) | $ | (73,086 | ) | $ | 192,089 | ||||||||||||||||
Dividends declared | — | — | — | — | — | (92,604 | ) | — | (92,604 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | — | — | 67,306,748 | 673 | 434,113 | — | — | 434,786 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of CDO X: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of unrealized gain on securities | — | — | — | — | — | — | (59,881 | ) | (59,881 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Deconsolidation of unrealized loss on derivatives designated as cash flow hedges | — | — | — | — | — | — | 34,367 | 34,367 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income | — | — | — | — | — | 377,131 | — | 377,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | — | 148,298 | 148,298 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity - September 30, 2012 | 2,463,321 | $ | 61,583 | 172,487,757 | $ | 1,725 | $ | 1,709,905 | $ | (788,725 | ) | $ | 49,698 | $ | 1,034,186 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
4 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Operating Activities | ||||||||
Net income | $ | 377,131 | $ | 238,751 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (inclusive of amounts related to discontinued operations): | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 2,701 | 225 | ||||||
Accretion of discount and other amortization | (38,923 | ) | (33,214 | ) | ||||
Interest income in CDOs redirected for reinvestment or CDO bond paydown | (2,944 | ) | (8,981 | ) | ||||
Interest income on investments accrued to principal balance | (16,759 | ) | (14,303 | ) | ||||
Interest expense on debt accrued to principal balance | 328 | 619 | ||||||
Payment of deferred interest | (568 | ) | — | |||||
Deferred interest received | — | 1,027 | ||||||
Non-cash directors’ compensation | 220 | 122 | ||||||
Reversal of valuation allowance on loans | (8,160 | ) | (38,218 | ) | ||||
Other-than-temporary impairment on securities | 14,593 | 13,595 | ||||||
Impairment on real estate held-for-sale | — | 433 | ||||||
Change in fair value of investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | (6,513 | ) | — | |||||
Gain on settlement of investments (net) and real estate held-for-sale | (232,885 | ) | (74,463 | ) | ||||
Unrealized loss on non-hedge derivatives and hedge ineffectiveness | 501 | 14,483 | ||||||
Gain on extinguishment of debt | (23,127 | ) | (60,402 | ) | ||||
Change in: | ||||||||
Restricted cash | 1,741 | 1,249 | ||||||
Receivables and other assets | 1,088 | 528 | ||||||
Due to affiliates | 1,692 | 113 | ||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 1,618 | 57 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities | 71,734 | 41,621 | ||||||
Cash Flows From Investing Activities | ||||||||
Principal repayments from repurchased CDO debt | 21,347 | 57,108 | ||||||
Principal repayments from CDO securities | 1,446 | 9,834 | ||||||
Principal repayments from non-Agency RMBS | 12,440 | 107 | ||||||
Return of investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | 13,327 | — | ||||||
Principal repayments from loans and non-CDO securities (excluding non-Agency RMBS) | 70,398 | 65,649 | ||||||
Purchase of real estate securities | (597,769 | ) | (303,101 | ) | ||||
Purchase of real estate loans | (9,216 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of investments | 127,000 | 3,885 | ||||||
Acquisition of investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | (218,642 | ) | — | |||||
Acquisition of investments in real estate | (141,576 | ) | — | |||||
Additions to investments in real estate | (26 | ) | — | |||||
Proceeds from sale of real estate held for sale | — | 650 | ||||||
Acquisition of servicing rights | — | (2,268 | ) | |||||
Deposit paid on investments | (25,857 | ) | — | |||||
Payments on settlement of derivative instruments | — | (14,322 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | (747,128 | ) | (182,458 | ) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements
5 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands)
Nine Months Ended September 30, | ||||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash Flows From Financing Activities | ||||||||
Repurchases of CDO bonds payable | (35,695 | ) | (91,039 | ) | ||||
Issuance of other bonds payable | — | 142,736 | ||||||
Repayments of other bonds payable | (33,177 | ) | (194,379 | ) | ||||
Borrowings under repurchase agreements | 407,878 | 291,818 | ||||||
Repayments of repurchase agreements | (42,291 | ) | (89,622 | ) | ||||
Margin deposits under repurchase agreements | (43,960 | ) | (8,597 | ) | ||||
Return of margin deposits under repurchase agreements | 43,447 | 8,597 | ||||||
Borrowings under mortgage notes payable | 88,400 | — | ||||||
Issuance of common stock | 435,821 | 211,567 | ||||||
Costs related to issuance of common stock | (840 | ) | (468 | ) | ||||
Common stock dividends paid | (66,249 | ) | (7,930 | ) | ||||
Preferred stock dividends paid | (4,185 | ) | (6,976 | ) | ||||
Payment of deferred financing costs | (1,831 | ) | (1,581 | ) | ||||
Purchase of derivative instruments | (244 | ) | — | |||||
Restricted cash returned from refinancing activities | — | 58,367 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities | 747,074 | 312,493 | ||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents | 71,680 | 171,656 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period | 157,356 | 33,524 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period | $ | 229,036 | $ | 205,180 | ||||
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||||||||
Cash paid during the period for interest expense | $ | 59,384 | $ | 76,730 | ||||
Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities | ||||||||
Preferred stock dividends declared but not paid | $ | 930 | $ | 930 | ||||
Common stock dividends declared but not paid | $ | 37,947 | $ | 15,776 | ||||
Purchase price payable on investments in excess mortgage servicing rights | $ | 3,250 | $ | — | ||||
Re-issuance of other bonds and notes payable to third parties upon deconsolidation of CDO | $ | 29,959 | $ | 5,751 | ||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements
6 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
1. GENERAL
Newcastle Investment Corp. (and its subsidiaries, “Newcastle”) is a Maryland corporation that was formed in 2002. Newcastle conducts its business through the following segments: (i) investments financed with non-recourse collateralized debt obligations (“non-recourse CDOs”), (ii) unlevered investments in deconsolidated Newcastle CDO debt (“unlevered CDOs”), (iii) unlevered investments in excess mortgage servicing rights (“unlevered Excess MSRs”), (iv) investments in senior living assets financed with non-recourse debt (“non-recourse senior living”), (v) investments financed with other non-recourse debt (“non-recourse other”), (vi) investments and debt repurchases financed with recourse debt (“recourse”), (vii) other unlevered investments (“unlevered other”) and (viii) corporate. With respect to the non-recourse CDOs and non-recourse other segments, subject to the passing of certain periodic coverage tests, Newcastle is generally entitled to receive the net cash flows from these structures on a periodic basis.
Newcastle is organized and conducts its operations to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. As such, Newcastle will generally not be subject to U.S. federal corporate income tax on that portion of its net income that is distributed to stockholders if it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders by prescribed dates and complies with various other requirements.
Newcastle is party to a management agreement (the “Management Agreement”) with FIG LLC (the “Manager”), a subsidiary of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”), under which the Manager advises Newcastle on various aspects of its business and manages its day-to-day operations, subject to the supervision of Newcastle’s board of directors. For its services, the Manager is entitled to an annual management fee and incentive compensation, both as defined in, and in accordance with the terms of, the Management Agreement.
Newcastle is party to management agreements (the “Senior Living Management Agreements”) with subsidiaries (the “Senior Living Managers”) of Fortress, under which the Senior Living Managers manage the day-to-day operations of the senior living assets, subject to the supervision of Newcastle’s officers and board of directors. For their services, the Senior Living Managers are entitled to an annual management fee as defined in, and in accordance with the terms of, the Senior Living Management Agreements.
In April 2012, Newcastle issued 18,975,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the public of $6.22 per share for net proceeds of approximately $115.2 million. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for its successful efforts in raising capital for Newcastle, in connection with this offering, Newcastle granted options to the Manager to purchase 1,897,500 shares of Newcastle’s common stock at the public offering price, which had a fair value of approximately $5.6 million as of the grant date.
In May 2012, Newcastle issued 23,000,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the public of $6.71 per share for net proceeds of approximately $152.0 million. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for its successful efforts in raising capital for Newcastle, in connection with this offering, Newcastle granted options to the Manager to purchase 2,300,000 shares of Newcastle’s common stock at the public offering price, which had a fair value of approximately $7.6 million as of the grant date.
In July 2012, Newcastle issued 25,300,000 shares of its common stock in a public offering at a price to the underwriters of $6.63 per share for net proceeds of approximately $167.4 million. Certain officers and directors of Newcastle participated in this offering and purchased an aggregate of 450,000 shares at a price of $6.70 per share. For the purpose of compensating the Manager for its successful efforts in raising capital for Newcastle, in connection with this offering, Newcastle granted options to the Manager to purchase 2,530,000 shares of Newcastle’s common stock at a price of $6.70, which had a fair value of approximately $8.3 million as of the grant date.
Approximately 4.9 million shares of Newcastle’s common stock were held by Fortress, through its affiliates, and its principals at September 30, 2012. In addition, Fortress, through its affiliates, held options to purchase approximately 11.2 million shares of Newcastle’s common stock at September 30, 2012.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes of Newcastle have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of Newcastle’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included and are of a normal and recurring nature. The operating results
7 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
presented for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Newcastle’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011 and notes thereto included in Newcastle’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Capitalized terms used herein, and not otherwise defined, are defined in Newcastle’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period’s presentation.
In May 2011, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the measurement and disclosure of fair value, which became effective for Newcastle on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on Newcastle’s financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued a new accounting standard that eliminates the current option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, an entity will be required to present items of net income and other comprehensive income in one continuous statement or in two separate, but consecutive, statements. Newcastle early-adopted this accounting standard in 2011 and opted to present two separate statements.
The FASB has recently issued or discussed a number of proposed standards on such topics as consolidation, the definition of an investment company, financial statement presentation, revenue recognition, leases, financial instruments, hedging and contingencies. Some of the proposed changes are significant and could have a material impact on Newcastle’s reporting. Newcastle has not yet fully evaluated the potential impact of these proposals, but will make such an evaluation as the standards are finalized.
2. SEGMENT REPORTING AND VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Newcastle conducts its business through the following segments: (i) investments financed with non-recourse collateralized debt obligations (“non-recourse CDOs”), (ii) unlevered investments in deconsolidated Newcastle CDO debt (“unlevered CDOs”), (iii) unlevered investments in excess mortgage servicing rights (“unlevered Excess MSRs”), (iv) investments in senior living assets financed with non-recourse debt (“non-recourse senior living”), (v) investments financed with other non-recourse debt (“non-recourse other”), (vi) investments and debt repurchases financed with recourse debt (“recourse”), (vii) other unlevered investments (“unlevered other”) and (viii) corporate. With respect to the non-recourse CDOs and non-recourse other segments, subject to the passing of certain periodic coverage tests, Newcastle is generally entitled to receive the net cash flows from these structures on a periodic basis.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, Newcastle changed the composition of its reportable segments such that the unlevered segment is further broken down into (i) unlevered CDOs, (ii) unlevered Excess MSRs and (iii) unlevered other. Management believes the additional segments better reflect its investments in deconsolidated CDOs and its new investment in Excess MSRs. Segment information for previously reported periods in the accompanying financial statements has been restated to reflect this change to the composition of its segments.
The corporate segment consists primarily of interest income on short term investments, general and administrative expenses, interest expense on the junior subordinated notes payable and management fees pursuant to the Management Agreement.
8 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Summary financial data on Newcastle’s segments is given below, together with a reconciliation to the same data for Newcastle as a whole:
Non-Recourse CDOs (A) | Unlevered CDOs (B) | Unlevered Excess MSRs | Non-Recourse Senior Living | Non-Recourse Other (A) (C) | Recourse (D) | Unlevered Other (E) | Corporate | Inter-segment Elimination (F) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 161,490 | $ | 339 | $ | 16,422 | $ | — | $ | 54,753 | $ | 4,981 | $ | 7,234 | $ | 135 | $ | (5,167 | ) | $ | 240,187 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 49,334 | — | — | 692 | 38,597 | 1,387 | — | 2,857 | (4,829 | ) | 88,038 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 112,156 | 339 | 16,422 | (692 | ) | 16,156 | 3,594 | 7,234 | (2,722 | ) | (338 | ) | 152,149 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment (reversal) | 3,173 | — | — | — | 3,202 | — | 58 | — | — | 6,433 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues | — | — | — | 7,548 | — | — | — | — | — | 7,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) | 256,358 | 259 | 6,513 | (21 | ) | — | — | 1,066 | — | — | 264,175 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | — | — | 4,742 | — | — | — | — | — | 4,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | — | — | — | 2,370 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 713 | 1 | 2,180 | 4,848 | 2,513 | — | 35 | 23,618 | — | 33,908 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 364,628 | 597 | 20,755 | (5,125 | ) | 10,441 | 3,594 | 8,207 | (26,340 | ) | (338 | ) | 376,419 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | 422 | — | (48 | ) | — | 338 | 712 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 364,628 | 597 | 20,755 | (5,125 | ) | 10,863 | 3,594 | 8,159 | (26,340 | ) | — | 377,131 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (4,185 | ) | — | (4,185 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | 364,628 | $ | 597 | $ | 20,755 | (5,125 | ) | $ | 10,863 | $ | 3,594 | $ | 8,159 | (30,525 | ) | $ | — | $ | 372,946 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 51,050 | $ | 109 | $ | 9,903 | $ | — | $ | 18,290 | $ | 3,213 | $ | 2,383 | $ | 32 | $ | (2,130 | ) | $ | 82,850 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 14,694 | — | — | 692 | 13,263 | 826 | — | 954 | (2,018 | ) | 28,411 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 36,356 | 109 | 9,903 | (692 | ) | 5,027 | 2,387 | 2,383 | (922 | ) | (112 | ) | 54,439 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment (reversal) | 3,962 | — | — | — | 499 | — | 553 | — | — | 5,014 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues | — | — | — | 7,548 | — | — | — | — | — | 7,548 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) | 231,825 | 83 | 1,774 | (21 | ) | — | — | 2,121 | — | — | 235,782 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses | — | — | — | 4,742 | — | — | — | — | — | 4,742 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization | — | — | — | 2,370 | — | — | — | — | — | 2,370 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses | 230 | — | 686 | 1,650 | 820 | — | 10 | 9,213 | — | 12,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 263,989 | 192 | 10,991 | (1,927 | ) | 3,708 | 2,387 | 3,941 | (10,135 | ) | (112 | ) | 273,034 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | 92 | — | (17 | ) | — | 112 | 187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 263,989 | 192 | 10,991 | (1,927 | ) | 3,800 | 2,387 | 3,924 | (10,135 | ) | — | 273,221 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,395 | ) | — | (1,395 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | 263,989 | $ | 192 | $ | 10,991 | $ | (1,927 | ) | $ | 3,800 | $ | 2,387 | $ | 3,924 | $ | (11,530 | ) | $ | — | 271,826 | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investments | $ | 1,462,566 | $ | 5,471 | $ | 258,347 | $ | 141,553 | $ | 765,047 | $ | 667,560 | $ | 133,408 | $ | — | $ | (69,182 | ) | 3,364,770 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and restricted cash | 2,829 | — | — | 5,980 | — | — | — | 223,056 | — | 231,865 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets | — | — | — | 224 | — | — | — | — | — | 224 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets | 6,319 | 8 | 25,214 | 4,005 | 113 | 2,416 | 1,904 | 181 | (157 | ) | 40,003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets | 1,471,714 | 5,479 | 283,561 | 151,762 | 765,160 | 669,976 | 135,312 | 223,237 | (69,339 | ) | 3,636,862 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt | (1,160,448 | ) | — | — | (88,400 | ) | (672,290 | ) | (599,959 | ) | — | (51,245 | ) | 69,182 | (2,503,160 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities | (36,519 | ) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (36,519 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities | (5,757 | ) | — | (5,390 | ) | (4,391 | ) | (2,484 | ) | (94 | ) | (67 | ) | (44,971 | ) | 157 | (62,997 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | (1,202,724 | ) | — | (5,390 | ) | (92,791 | ) | (674,774 | ) | (600,053 | ) | (67 | ) | (96,216 | ) | 69,339 | (2,602,676 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (61,583 | ) | — | (61,583 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP book value | $ | 268,990 | $ | 5,479 | $ | 278,171 | $ | 58,971 | $ | 90,386 | $ | 69,923 | $ | 135,245 | $ | 65,438 | $ | — | 972,603 |
9 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Non-Recourse CDOs (A) | Unlevered CDOs (B) | Unlevered Excess MSRs | Non-Recourse Senior Living | Non-Recourse Other (A) | Recourse | Unlevered Other | Corporate | Inter-segment Elimination (F) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 164,523 | $ | 120 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 54,421 | $ | 1,626 | $ | 1,933 | $ | 99 | $ | (3,983 | ) | $ | 218,739 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 67,173 | — | — | — | 39,660 | 455 | — | 2,859 | (3,645 | ) | 106,502 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 97,350 | 120 | — | — | 14,761 | 1,171 | 1,933 | (2,760 | ) | (338 | ) | 112,237 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment (reversal) | (27,904 | ) | — | — | — | 7,012 | — | (3,731 | ) | — | — | (24,623 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) | 115,425 | 3,643 | — | — | 2,561 | — | 1,531 | — | — | 123,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | 779 | — | — | — | 2,679 | — | 4 | 17,958 | — | 21,420 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 239,900 | 3,763 | — | — | 7,631 | 1,171 | 7,191 | (20,718 | ) | (338 | ) | 238,600 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | (131 | ) | — | (56 | ) | — | 338 | 151 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 239,900 | 3,763 | — | — | 7,500 | 1,171 | 7,135 | (20,718 | ) | — | 238,751 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (4,185 | ) | — | (4,185 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | 239,900 | $ | 3,763 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 7,500 | $ | 1,171 | $ | 7,135 | $ | (24,903 | ) | $ | — | $ | 234,566 | |||||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 53,403 | $ | 97 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 18,816 | $ | 1,029 | $ | 941 | $ | 36 | $ | (1,929 | ) | $ | 72,393 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 19,909 | — | — | — | 13,329 | 213 | — | 953 | (1,817 | ) | 32,587 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income (expense) | 33,494 | 97 | — | — | 5,487 | 816 | 941 | (917 | ) | (112 | ) | 39,806 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment (reversal) | 17,550 | — | — | — | 3,919 | — | 181 | — | — | 21,650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) | 18,262 | 116 | — | — | — | — | 424 | — | — | 18,802 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses | 250 | — | — | — | 933 | — | (111 | ) | 6,094 | — | 7,166 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 33,956 | 213 | — | — | 635 | 816 | 1,295 | (7,011 | ) | (112 | ) | 29,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations | — | — | — | — | 54 | — | (15 | ) | — | 112 | 151 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) | 33,956 | 213 | — | — | 689 | 816 | 1,280 | (7,011 | ) | — | 29,943 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred dividends | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (1,395 | ) | — | (1,395 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) applicable to common stockholders | $ | 33,956 | 213 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 689 | $ | 816 | $ | 1,280 | $ | (8,406 | ) | $ | — | $ | 28,548 |
(A) | Assets held within CDOs and other non-recourse structures are not available to satisfy obligations outside of such financings, except to the extent Newcastle receives net cash flow distributions from such structures. Furthermore, creditors or beneficial interest holders of these structures have no recourse to the general credit of Newcastle. Therefore, Newcastle’s exposure to the economic losses from such structures is limited to its invested equity in them and economically their book value cannot be less than zero. Therefore, impairment recorded in excess of Newcastle’s investment, which results in negative GAAP book value for a given non-recourse financing structure, cannot economically be incurred and will eventually be reversed through amortization, sales at gains, or as gains at the deconsolidation or termination of such non-recourse financing structure. |
(B) | Represents unlevered investments in CDO securities issued by Newcastle. These CDOs have been deconsolidated as Newcastle does not have the power to direct the relevant activities of the CDOs. |
10 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
(C) | The following table summarizes the investments and debt in the other non-recourse segment: |
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Investments | Debt | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Carrying | Outstanding | Carrying | |||||||||||||
Face Amount | Value | Face Amount* | Value* | |||||||||||||
Manufactured housing loan portfolio I | $ | 122,453 | $ | 102,745 | $ | 93,926 | $ | 85,145 | ||||||||
Manufactured housing loan portfolio II | 158,542 | 155,933 | 123,797 | 122,961 | ||||||||||||
Residential mortgage loans | 53,384 | 39,208 | 11,746 | 11,746 | ||||||||||||
Subprime mortgage loans subject to call options | 406,217 | 405,525 | 406,217 | 405,525 | ||||||||||||
Real estate securities | 64,044 | 53,797 | 44,959 | 40,913 | ||||||||||||
Operating real estate | N/A | 7,839 | 6,000 | 6,000 | ||||||||||||
$ | 804,640 | $ | 765,047 | $ | 686,645 | $ | 672,290 |
* | An aggregate face amount of $78.0 million (carrying value of $69.2 million) of debt represents financing provided by the CDO segment (and included as investments in the CDO segment), which is eliminated upon consolidation. |
(D) | The $600.0 million of recourse debt is comprised of (i) a $538.5 million repurchase agreement secured by $577.1 million carrying value of FNMA/FHLMC securities, (ii) a $1.8 million repurchase agreement secured by $26.4 million face amount of senior notes issued by Newcastle CDO VI, which was repurchased by Newcastle and is eliminated in consolidation and (iii) a $59.6 million repurchase agreement secured by $90.4 million carrying value of non-agency residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”). |
(E) | The following table summarizes the investments in the unlevered other segment: |
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Outstanding | Carrying | Number of | ||||||||||
Face Amount | Value | Investments | ||||||||||
Real estate securities* | $ | 322,922 | $ | 115,400 | 41 | |||||||
Real estate related loans | 28,801 | 9,418 | 2 | |||||||||
Residential mortgage loans | 3,735 | 2,566 | 133 | |||||||||
Other investments | N/A | 6,024 | 1 | |||||||||
$ | 355,458 | $ | 133,408 | 177 |
* | During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Newcastle purchased 20 non-agency RMBS with an aggregate face amount of $185.2 million for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $108.3 million, or an average price of 58.5% of par. As of September 30, 2012, these securities had an aggregate face amount of $181.4 million and a carrying value of $109.5 million. |
(F) | Represents the elimination of investments and financings and their related income and expenses between the CDO segment and other non-recourse segment as the corresponding inter-segment investments and financings are presented on a gross basis within each of these segments. |
Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”)
The VIEs in which Newcastle has a significant interest include (i) Newcastle’s CDOs, in which Newcastle has been determined to be the primary beneficiary and therefore consolidates them (with the exception of CDO V), since it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the CDOs’ economic performance and would absorb a significant portion of their expected losses and receive a significant portion of their expected residual returns, and (ii) the manufactured housing loan financing structures, which are similar to the CDOs in analysis. Newcastle’s CDOs and manufactured housing loan financings are held in special purpose entities whose debt is treated as non-recourse secured borrowings of Newcastle. Newcastle’s subprime securitizations are also considered VIEs, but Newcastle does not control their activities and no longer receives a significant portion of their returns. These subprime securitizations are not consolidated.
In addition, Newcastle’s investments in CMBS, CDO securities and loans may be deemed to be variable interests in VIEs, depending on their structure. Newcastle is not obligated to provide, nor has it provided, any financial support to these VIEs. Newcastle monitors these investments and, to the extent Newcastle determines that it potentially owns a majority of the currently controlling class, it analyzes them for potential consolidation. As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle has not consolidated these potential VIEs due to the determination that, based on the nature of Newcastle’s investments and the provisions governing these structures, Newcastle does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance.
11 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
On September 12, 2012, Newcastle deconsolidated CDO X subsequent to the completion of the sale of 100% of its interests in CDO X to the sole owner of the senior notes and another third party. The sale and resulting deconsolidation has reduced Newcastle’s gross assets by $1.1 billion, reduced liabilities by $1.2 billion, decreased other comprehensive income by $25.5 million and resulted in a gain on sale of $224.3 million. As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle had no continuing involvement with CDO X.
Newcastle had variable interests in the following unconsolidated VIE at September 30, 2012, in addition to the subprime securitizations which are described in Note 4:
Carrying Value of Newcastle’s | ||||||||||||
Entity | Gross Assets (A) | Debt (A) (B) | Investment (C) | |||||||||
Newcastle CDO V | $ | 286,993 | $ | 295,558 | $ | 5,471 |
(A) | Face amount. |
(B) | Includes $42.7 million face amount of debt owned by Newcastle with a carrying value of $5.5 million at September 30, 2012. |
(C) | This amount represents Newcastle’s maximum exposure to loss from this entity, which was the fair value at September 30, 2012, related to $19.2 million face amount of CDO V Class I, III, and IV-FL notes. |
12 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
3. REAL ESTATE SECURITIES
The following is a summary of Newcastle’s real estate securities at September 30, 2012, all of which are classified as available-for-sale and are, therefore, reported at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income, except for securities that are other-than-temporarily impaired.
Amortized Cost Basis | Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding Face | Before | Other-Than- Temporary Impairment | After | Gross Unrealized | Carrying | Number of | Rating | Maturity (Years) | Principal Subordination | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Type | Amount | Impairment | (A) | Impairment | Gains | Losses | Value (B) | Securities | (C) | Coupon | Yield | (D) | (E) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS-Conduit | $ | 345,236 | $ | 315,954 | $ | (94,271 | ) | $ | 221,683 | $ | 44,782 | $ | (13,556 | ) | $ | 252,909 | 54 | BB- | 5.56 | % | 11.47 | % | 3.7 | 10.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS- Single Borrower | 125,545 | 123,876 | (12,364 | ) | 111,512 | 2,941 | (3,454 | ) | 110,999 | 22 | BB | 4.89 | % | 5.91 | % | 2.9 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS-Large Loan | 13,903 | 13,541 | — | 13,541 | 341 | (38 | ) | 13,844 | 2 | A- | 4.40 | % | 8.60 | % | 0.6 | 10.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
REIT Debt | 87,700 | 86,916 | — | 86,916 | 6,373 | (229 | ) | 93,060 | 11 | BBB- | 5.55 | % | 5.74 | % | 2.1 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABS-Subprime (F) | 438,269 | 310,401 | (68,708 | ) | 241,693 | 19,104 | (358 | ) | 260,439 | 63 | CCC- | 0.87 | % | 7.82 | % | 4.9 | 14.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABS-Franchise | 10,208 | 9,754 | (7,839 | ) | 1,915 | — | (339 | ) | 1,576 | 3 | CCC- | 5.89 | % | 4.13 | % | 4.9 | 3.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA/FHLMC | 534,801 | 572,356 | — | 572,356 | 5,043 | (267 | ) | 577,132 | 45 | AAA | 2.80 | % | 1.33 | % | 4.3 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO (G) | 203,707 | 82,051 | (14,861 | ) | 67,190 | 3,230 | (19 | ) | 70,401 | 13 | CCC+ | 3.04 | % | 7.81 | % | 1.8 | 21.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total / Average (H) | $ | 1,759,369 | $ | 1,514,849 | $ | (198,043 | ) | $ | 1,316,806 | $ | 81,814 | $ | (18,260 | ) | $ | 1,380,360 | 213 | BB+ | 3.21 | % | 5.34 | % | 3.8 |
(A) | Represents the cumulative impairment against amortized cost basis recorded through earnings, net of the effect of the cumulative adjustment as a result of the adoption of new accounting guidance on impairment in 2009. |
(B) | See Note 7 regarding the estimation of fair value, which is equal to carrying value for all securities. |
(C) | Represents the weighted average of the ratings of all securities in each asset type, expressed as an S&P equivalent rating. For each security rated by multiple rating agencies, the lowest rating is used. Newcastle used an implied AAA rating for the FNMA/FHLMC securities. Ratings provided were determined by third party rating agencies as of a particular date, may not be current and are subject to change at any time. |
(D) | The weighted average maturity is based on the timing of expected principal reduction on the assets. |
(E) | Percentage of the outstanding face amount of securities and residual interests that is subordinate to Newcastle’s investments. |
(F) | Includes (i) the retained bonds with a face amount of $4.0 million and a carrying value of $0.4 million from Securitization Trust 2006 (Note 4) and (ii) 21 non-agency RMBS purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 with an aggregate face amount of $308.9 million and a carrying value of $199.9 million as of September 30, 2012. |
(G) | Includes two CDO bonds issued by a third party with a carrying value of $60.9 million, four CDO bonds issued by CDO V (which has been deconsolidated) and held as investments by Newcastle with a carrying value of $5.5 million and seven CDO bonds issued by C-BASS with a carrying value of $4.0 million. |
(H) | The total outstanding face amount of fixed rate securities was $0.6 billion, and of floating rate securities was $1.2 billion. |
13 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Unrealized losses that are considered other-than-temporary are recognized currently in earnings. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Newcastle recorded other-than-temporary impairment charges (“OTTI”) of $16.5 million (gross of $1.9 million of other-than-temporary impairment recognized in other comprehensive income) with respect to real estate securities. Based on management’s analysis of these securities, the performance of the underlying loans and changes in market factors, Newcastle noted adverse changes in the expected cash flows on certain of these securities and concluded that they were other-than-temporarily impaired. Any remaining unrealized losses on Newcastle’s securities were primarily the result of changes in market factors, rather than issue-specific credit impairment. Newcastle performed analyses in relation to such securities, using management’s best estimate of their cash flows, which support its belief that the carrying values of such securities were fully recoverable over their expected holding period. The following table summarizes Newcastle’s securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2012.
Amortized Cost Basis | Gross Unrealized | Weighted Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities in an Unrealized Loss Position | Outstanding Face Amount | Before Impairment | Other-than- Temporary Impairment | After Impairment | Gains | Losses | Carrying Value | Number of Securities | Rating | Coupon | Yield | Maturity (Years) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less Than Twelve Months | $ | 183,385 | $ | 161,087 | $ | (3,988 | ) | $ | 157,099 | $ | — | $ | (574 | ) | $ | 156,525 | 16 | BBB- | 2.21 | % | 2.69 | % | 4.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Twelve or More Months | 187,554 | 179,773 | (7,883 | ) | 171,890 | — | (17,686 | ) | 154,204 | 33 | BB- | 4.82 | % | 6.21 | % | 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 370,939 | $ | 340,860 | $ | (11,871 | ) | $ | 328,989 | $ | — | $ | (18,260 | ) | $ | 310,729 | 49 | BB | 3.53 | % | 4.53 | % | 3.8 |
Newcastle performed an assessment of all of its debt securities that are in an unrealized loss position (unrealized loss position exists when a security’s amortized cost basis, excluding the effect of OTTI, exceeds its fair value) and determined the following:
September 30, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost Basis After | Unrealized Losses | |||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Impairment | Credit (B) | Non-Credit (C) | |||||||||||||
Securities Newcastle intends to sell | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | N/A | |||||||||
Securities Newcastle is more likely than not to be required to sell (A) | — | — | — | N/A | ||||||||||||
Securities Newcastle has no intent to sell and is not more likely than not to be required to sell: | ||||||||||||||||
Credit impaired securities | 1,433 | 1,602 | (11,735 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||||||||
Non credit impaired securities | 309,296 | 327,387 | — | (18,091 | ) | |||||||||||
Total debt securities in an unrealized loss position | $ | 310,729 | $ | 328,989 | $ | (11,735 | ) | $ | (18,260 | ) |
(A) | Newcastle may, at times, be more likely than not to be required to sell certain securities for liquidity purposes. While the amount of the securities to be sold may be an estimate, and the securities to be sold have not yet been identified, Newcastle must make its best estimate, which is subject to significant judgment regarding future events, and may differ materially from actual future sales. |
(B) | This amount is required to be recorded as other-than-temporary impairment through earnings. In measuring the portion of credit losses, Newcastle’s management estimates the expected cash flow for each of the securities. This evaluation includes a review of the credit status and the performance of the collateral supporting those securities, including the credit of the issuer, key terms of the securities and the effect of local, industry and broader economic trends. Significant inputs in estimating the cash flows include management’s expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates and loss severities. Credit losses are measured as the decline in the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the investment’s effective interest rate. |
(C) | This amount represents unrealized losses on securities that are due to non-credit factors and is required to be recorded through other comprehensive income. |
14 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
The following table summarizes the activity related to credit losses on debt securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Beginning balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income | $ | (20,207 | ) | |
Additions for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized | — | |||
Increases to credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized and a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income | (259 | ) | ||
Additions for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized without any portion of OTTI recognized in other comprehensive income | (3,988 | ) | ||
Reduction for credit losses on securities for which no OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income at the current measurement date | 7,467 | |||
Reduction for securities sold during the period | 1,498 | |||
Reduction for securities deconsolidated during the period | 3,736 | |||
Reduction for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security | 18 | |||
Ending balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income | $ | (11,735 | ) |
The table below summarizes the geographic distribution of the collateral securing Newcastle’s CMBS and ABS at September 30, 2012 (in thousands):
CMBS | ABS | |||||||||||||||
Geographic Location | Outstanding Face Amount | Percentage | Outstanding Face Amount | Percentage | ||||||||||||
Western U.S. | $ | 122,673 | 25.3 | % | $ | 147,667 | 32.9 | % | ||||||||
Northeastern U.S. | 93,720 | 19.3 | % | 94,327 | 21.1 | % | ||||||||||
Southeastern U.S. | 99,564 | 20.5 | % | 104,441 | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||
Midwestern U.S. | 78,015 | 16.2 | % | 47,103 | 10.5 | % | ||||||||||
Southwestern U.S. | 64,379 | 13.3 | % | 48,561 | 10.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other | 11,183 | 2.3 | % | 6,378 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||
Foreign | 15,150 | 3.1 | % | — | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 484,684 | 100.0 | % | $ | 448,477 | 100.0 | % |
Geographic concentrations of investments expose Newcastle to the risk of economic downturns within the relevant regions, particularly given the current unfavorable market conditions. These market conditions may make regions more vulnerable to downturns in certain market factors. Any such downturn in a region where Newcastle holds significant investments could have a material, negative impact on Newcastle.
15 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
4. REAL ESTATE RELATED LOANS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS, SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LOANS, CDO SERVICING RIGHTS AND INVESTMENTS IN EXCESS MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The following is a summary of real estate related loans, residential mortgage loans and subprime mortgage loans at September 30, 2012. The loans contain various terms, including fixed and floating rates, self-amortizing and interest only. They are generally subject to prepayment.
Loan Type | Outstanding Face Amount | Carrying Value (A) | Loan Count | Wtd. Avg. Yield | Weighted Average Coupon | Weighted Average Maturity (Years) (B) | Floating Rate Loans as a % of Face Amount | Delinquent Face Amount (C) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mezzanine Loans | $ | 530,343 | $ | 443,269 | 17 | 10.79 | % | 8.55 | % | 2.3 | 67.0 | % | $ | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Corporate Bank Loans | 334,855 | 180,044 | 7 | 20.05 | % | 9.51 | % | 1.9 | 40.7 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
B-Notes | 207,494 | 188,748 | 7 | 10.79 | % | 5.51 | % | 2.4 | 71.4 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Whole Loans | 30,242 | 30,242 | 3 | 5.20 | % | 3.84 | % | 1.3 | 96.3 | % | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Related Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-for-Sale, Net | $ | 1,102,934 | $ | 842,303 | 34 | 12.57 | % | 8.14 | % | 2.2 | 60.7 | % | $ | 12,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio I | $ | 591 | $ | 151 | 16 | 38.88 | % | 7.83 | % | 0.7 | 0.0 | % | $ | 56 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio II | 3,144 | 2,415 | 117 | 15.47 | % | 10.03 | % | 5.5 | 9.2 | % | 370 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential Mortgage Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held-for-Sale, Net (D) | $ | 3,735 | $ | 2,566 | 133 | 16.85 | % | 9.68 | % | 4.7 | 7.7 | % | $ | 426 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio I | $ | 122,453 | $ | 102,745 | 3,268 | 9.48 | % | 8.66 | % | 6.9 | 0.8 | % | $ | 990 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio II | 158,542 | 155,933 | 5,534 | 7.51 | % | 9.64 | % | 5.7 | 16.9 | % | 2,676 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Loans | 57,163 | 42,692 | 202 | 7.56 | % | 2.57 | % | 6.4 | 100.0 | % | 10,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential Mortgage Loans Held- for-Investment, Net (D) (E) | $ | 338,158 | $ | 301,370 | 9,004 | 8.19 | % | 8.09 | % | 6.2 | 25.1 | % | $ | 14,046 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subprime Mortgage Loans Subject to Call Option | $ | 406,217 | $ | 405,525 |
(A) | Carrying value includes interest receivable of $0.1 million for the residential housing loans and principal and interest receivable of $4.9 million for the manufactured housing loans. |
(B) | The weighted average maturity is based on the timing of expected principal reduction on the assets. |
(C) | Includes loans that are 60 or more days past due (including loans that are in foreclosure, or borrower’s in bankruptcy) or considered real estate owned (“REO”). As of September 30, 2012, $136.5 million face amount of real estate related loans was on non-accrual status. |
(D) | Loans acquired at a discount for credit quality. |
(E) | The following is an aging analysis of past due residential loans held-for-investment as of September 30, 2012: |
30-59 Days Past Due | 60-89 Days Past Due | Over 90 Days Past Due | REO | Total Past Due | Current | Total Outstanding Face Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portoflio I | $ | 839 | $ | 263 | $ | 383 | $ | 344 | $ | 1,829 | $ | 120,624 | $ | 122,453 | ||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portoflio II | $ | 1,159 | $ | 313 | $ | 1,594 | $ | 769 | $ | 3,835 | $ | 154,707 | $ | 158,542 | ||||||||||||||
Residential Loans | $ | 300 | $ | 1,020 | $ | 8,784 | $ | 576 | $ | 10,680 | $ | 46,483 | $ | 57,163 |
Newcastle’s management monitors the credit qualities of the Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolios I and II primarily by using aging analyses, current trends in delinquencies and actual loss incurrence rates.
16 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
The following is a summary of real estate related loans by maturities at September 30, 2012:
Year of Maturity (1) | Face Amount | Carrying Value | Loans | |||||||||||
Delinquent (2) | $ | 12,000 | $ | — | 1 | |||||||||
Period from October 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 | 59,644 | 16,695 | 1 | |||||||||||
2013 | 35,970 | 27,501 | 3 | |||||||||||
2014 | 394,090 | 243,428 | 12 | |||||||||||
2015 | 249,537 | 210,614 | 7 | |||||||||||
2016 | 240,252 | 238,457 | 5 | |||||||||||
2017 | 95,483 | 91,321 | 4 | |||||||||||
Thereafter | 15,958 | 14,287 | 1 | |||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,102,934 | $ | 842,303 | 34 |
(1) | Based on the final extended maturity date of each loan investment as of September 30, 2012. |
(2) | Includes loans that are non-performing, in foreclosure, or under bankruptcy. |
Activities relating to the carrying value of our real estate loans and residential mortgage loans are as follows:
Held-for-Sale | Held-for-Investment | |||||||||||
Real Estate Related Loans | Residential Mortgage Loans | Residential Mortgage Loans | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 813,580 | $ | 2,687 | $ | 331,236 | ||||||
Purchases / additional fundings | 91,481 | — | — | |||||||||
Interest accrued to principal balance | 16,759 | — | — | |||||||||
Principal paydowns | (89,243 | ) | (622 | ) | (29,448 | ) | ||||||
Sales | — | — | — | |||||||||
Valuation (allowance) reversal on loans | 10,879 | 482 | (3,201 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on repayment of loans held-for-sale | (1,614 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Accretion of loan discount and other amortization | — | — | 3,208 | |||||||||
Other | 461 | 19 | (425 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | 842,303 | 2,566 | $ | 301,370 |
The following is a rollforward of the related loss allowance.
Held-For-Sale | Held-For-Investment | |||||||||||
Real Estate Related Loans | Residential Mortgage Loans | Residential Mortgage Loans (B) | ||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | (228,017 | ) | $ | (2,461 | ) | $ | (26,075 | ) | |||
Charge-offs (A) | 17,648 | 870 | 6,363 | |||||||||
Valuation (allowance) reversal on loans | 10,879 | 482 | (3,201 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | (199,490 | ) | $ | (1,109 | ) | $ | (22,913 | ) |
(A) | The charge-offs for real estate related loans represent a loan which was paid off at a discounted price during the period. |
(B) | The allowance for credit losses was determined based on the guidance for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality. |
17 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Investments in Excess Mortgage Servicing Rights
The following is a summary of Newcastle’s Excess MSRs:
September 30, 2012 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid Principal Balance | Amortized Cost Basis (A) | Carrying Value (B) | Weighted Average Yield | Average Maturity (Years) (C) | Changes in Fair Value Recorded in Other Income (Loss) (D) | |||||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 1 | $ | 8,761,705 | $ | 31,360 | $ | 36,430 | 18.0 | % | 4.7 | $ | 4,902 | |||||||||||||
MSR Pool 1 - Recapture Agreement | — | 4,999 | 5,473 | 18.0 | % | 10.6 | 275 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 2 | 9,734,046 | 34,729 | 35,024 | 17.3 | % | 4.9 | 295 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 2 - Recapture Agreement | — | 5,820 | 6,251 | 17.3 | % | 11.7 | 431 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 3 | 9,413,001 | 29,195 | 31,037 | 17.6 | % | 4.7 | 1,842 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 3 - Recapture Agreement | — | 5,210 | 5,091 | 17.6 | % | 11.2 | (119 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 4 | 6,013,872 | 11,875 | 12,451 | 17.9 | % | 4.6 | 576 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 4 - Recapture Agreement | — | 2,952 | 3,073 | 17.9 | % | 11.0 | 121 | |||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 5 | 45,706,396 | 116,805 | 114,779 | 17.5 | % | 4.8 | (2,026 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 5 - Recapture Agreement | — | 8,522 | 8,738 | 17.5 | % | 12.1 | 216 | |||||||||||||||||
$ | 79,629,020 | $ | 251,467 | $ | 258,347 | 17.6 | % | 5.5 | $ | 6,513 |
(A) | The amortized cost basis of the Recapture Agreements is determined based on the relative fair values of the Recapture Agreements and related Excess MSRs at the time they were acquired. | |
(B) | Carrying value represents the fair value of the pools or Recapture Agreements, as applicable. | |
(C) | The weighted average maturity represents the weighted average expected timing of the receipt of cash flows of each investment. | |
(D) | The portion of the change in fair value of the Recapture Agreement relating to loans recaptured to date is reflected in the respective pool. |
In December 2011, Newcastle entered into an agreement (“MSR Agreement I”) with Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar”), a leading residential mortgage servicer majority-owned by funds managed by Newcastle’s manager, to invest in Excess MSRs with Nationstar. Nationstar acquired the mortgage servicing rights on a pool of government-sponsored enterprise (“GSE”) residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $9.9 billion (“MSR Pool 1”) on September 30, 2011. Nationstar is entitled to receive an initial weighted average total mortgage servicing amount of 35 basis points (bps) on the performing unpaid principal balance, as well as any ancillary income from MSR Pool 1. Pursuant to MSR Agreement I, Nationstar performs all servicing functions and advancing functions related to MSR Pool 1 for a basic fee (the contractual amount the service is entitled to for performing the servicing duties) of 6 bps. Therefore, the remainder, or “excess mortgage servicing amount” is initially equal to a weighted average of 29 bps. Newcastle acquired the right to receive 65% of the excess mortgage servicing amount on MSR Pool 1 and, subject to certain limitations and pursuant to a loan replacement agreement (the “Recapture Agreement”), 65% of the Excess MSRs on certain future mortgage loans originated by Nationstar, that represent refinancings of loans in MSR Pool 1 (which loans then become part of MSR Pool 1) for $43.7 million. Nationstar has co-invested, pari passu with Newcastle, in 35% of the Excess MSRs. Nationstar, as servicer, also retains the ancillary income, the servicing obligations and liabilities as the servicer. If Nationstar is terminated as the servicer, Newcastle’s right to receive its portion of the excess mortgage servicing amount is also terminated. To the extent that Nationstar is terminated as the servicer and receives a termination payment, Newcastle is entitled to a pro rata share, or 65%, of such termination payment.
On June 5, 2012, Newcastle announced the completion of a co-investment with Nationstar related to their acquisition of mortgage servicing rights from Bank of America, National Association. Newcastle has invested approximately $44 million to acquire a 65% interest in the Excess MSRs on a portfolio of residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $10.4 billion (“MSR Pool 2”), comprised of conforming loans in GSE pools. Nationstar has co-invested pari passu with Newcastle in 35% of the Excess MSRs and will be the servicer of the loans performing all servicing and advancing functions, and retaining the ancillary income, servicing obligations and liabilities as the servicer. Under the terms of this investment, to the extent that any loans in the portfolio are refinanced by Nationstar, the resulting Excess MSRs will be shared pro rata by Newcastle and Nationstar, subject to certain limitations. As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle funded $39.1 million of the purchase price and expected the remainder of the purchase price payable to Nationstar to be funded in the fourth quarter of 2012 pursuant to the payment terms of the agreement.
On June 29, 2012, Newcastle announced the completion of a co-investment in Excess MSRs in connection with Nationstar’s acquisition of mortgage servicing rights from Aurora Bank FSB, a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Bancorp Inc. Newcastle invested approximately $176.5 million to acquire a 65% interest in the Excess MSRs on a portfolio of
18 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $63.7 billion, comprised of approximately 75% non-conforming loans in private label securitizations and approximately 25% conforming loans in GSE pools. The portfolio is comprised of three pools: a pool of non-conforming loans in private label securitizations with an outstanding principal balance of approximately $47.6 billion (“MSR Pool 5”), and two GSE loan pools with outstanding principal balances of approximately $6.3 billion (“MSR Pool 4”) and $9.8 billion (“MSR Pool 3”), respectively. Nationstar has co-invested pari passu with Newcastle in 35% of the Excess MSRs and will be the servicer of the loans performing all servicing and advancing functions, and retaining the ancillary income, servicing obligations and liabilities as the servicer. Under the terms of this investment, to the extent that any loans in the portfolio are refinanced by Nationstar, the resulting Excess MSRs will be shared pro rata by Newcastle and Nationstar, subject to certain limitations.
The table below summarizes the geographic distribution of the underlying residential mortgage loans of the Excess MSRs at September 30, 2012:
State Concentration | Percentage of Total Outstanding | |||
California | 32.3 | % | ||
Florida | 10.1 | % | ||
Washington | 4.3 | % | ||
New York | 4.2 | % | ||
Arizona | 4.0 | % | ||
Texas | 3.6 | % | ||
Colorado | 3.5 | % | ||
Maryland | 3.3 | % | ||
New Jersey | 3.1 | % | ||
Virginia | 3.0 | % | ||
Other U.S. | 28.6 | % | ||
100.0 | % |
(A) | Based on the information provided by the loan servicer as of the most recent remittance. |
Geographic concentrations of investments expose Newcastle to the risk of economic downturns within the relevant states. Any such downturn in a state where Newcastle holds significant investments could affect the underlying borrower’s ability to make the mortgage payment and therefore could have a meaningful, negative impact on Newcastle’s Excess MSRs.
See note 12 regarding the agreements to acquire an additional portfolio of Excess MSRs.
CDO Servicing Rights
In February 2011, Newcastle, through one of its subsidiaries, purchased the management rights with respect to certain CBASS Investment Management LLC (“C-BASS”) CDOs pursuant to a bankruptcy proceeding for $2.2 million. Newcastle initially recorded the cost of acquiring the collateral management rights as a servicing asset and subsequently amortizes this asset in proportion to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Servicing assets are assessed for impairment on a quarterly basis, with impairment recognized as a valuation allowance. Key economic assumptions used in measuring any potential impairment of the servicing assets include the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, default rates, loss severities and discount rates. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, Newcastle recorded $0.3 million and $0.2 million of servicing rights amortization and no servicing rights impairment. As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle’s servicing asset had a carrying value of $1.8 million recorded in Receivables and Other Assets.
19 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Securitization of Subprime Mortgage Loans
The following table presents information on the retained interests in Newcastle’s securitizations of subprime mortgage loans at September 30, 2012:
Subprime Portfolio | ||||||||||||
I | II | Total | ||||||||||
Total securitized loans (unpaid principal balance) (A) | $ | 434,578 | $ | 573,735 | $ | 1,008,313 | ||||||
Loans subject to call option (carrying value) | $ | 299,176 | $ | 106,349 | $ | 405,525 | ||||||
Retained interests (fair value) (B) | $ | 381 | $ | — | $ | 381 |
(A) | Average loan seasoning of 86 months and 68 months for Subprime Portfolios I and II, respectively, at September 30, 2012. |
(B) | The retained interests include retained bonds of the securitizations. The fair value of which is estimated based on pricing models. Newcastle’s residual interests were written off in 2010. The weighted average yield of the retained bonds was 8.36% as of September 30, 2012. |
Newcastle has no obligation to repurchase any loans from either of its subprime securitizations. Therefore, it is expected that its exposure to loss is limited to the carrying amount of its retained interests in the securitization entities, as described above. A subsidiary of Newcastle gave limited representations and warranties with respect to Subprime Portfolio II and is required to pay the difference, if any, between the repurchase price of any loan in such portfolio and the price required to be paid by a third party originator for such loan. Such subsidiary, however, has no assets and does not have recourse to the general credit of Newcastle.
The following table summarizes certain characteristics of the underlying subprime mortgage loans, and related financing, in the securitizations as of September 30, 2012:
Subprime Portfolio | ||||||||
I | II | |||||||
Loan unpaid principal balance (UPB) | $ | 434,578 | $ | 573,735 | ||||
Weighted average coupon rate of loans | 5.39 | % | 4.59 | % | ||||
Delinquencies of 60 or more days (UPB) (A) | $ | 100,159 | $ | 165,693 | ||||
Net credit losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 | $ | 24,034 | $ | 29,599 | ||||
Cumulative net credit losses | $ | 216,903 | $ | 251,452 | ||||
Cumulative net credit losses as a % of original UPB | 14.4 | % | 23.1 | % | ||||
Percentage of ARM loans (B) | 51.4 | % | 64.6 | % | ||||
Percentage of loans with original loan-to-value ratio >90% | 10.6 | % | 17.2 | % | ||||
Percentage of interest-only loans | 21.0 | % | 4.2 | % | ||||
Face amount of debt (C) | $ | 430,578 | $ | 573,735 | ||||
Weighted average funding cost of debt (D) | 0.58 | % | 1.16 | % |
(A) | Delinquencies include loans 60 or more days past due, in foreclosure, under bankruptcy filing or real estate owned. |
(B) | ARM loans are adjustable-rate mortgage loans. An option ARM is an adjustable-rate mortgage that provides the borrower with an option to choose from several payment amounts each month for a specified period of the loan term. None of the loans in the subprime portfolios are option ARMs. |
(C) | Excludes face amount of $4.0 million of retained notes for Subprime Portfolio I at September 30, 2012. |
(D) | Includes the effect of applicable hedges. |
Newcastle received negligible cash inflows from the retained interests of Subprime Portfolios I and II during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
The loans subject to call option and the corresponding financing recognize interest income and expense based on the expected weighted average coupons of the loans subject to call option at the call date of 9.24% and 8.68% for Subprime Portfolio’s I and II, respectively.
5. INVESTMENTS IN SENIOR LIVING FACILITIES
On July 18, 2012, Newcastle completed the acquisition of eight senior housing assets for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $143.3 million plus acquisition-related costs. These assets comprise more than 800 beds in senior living facilities located in California, Oregon, Utah, Arizona and Idaho. In connection with the acquisition of the senior living assets described above, the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed were recorded at fair value. A summary of the initial recording of the acquisition on July 18, 2012, is as follows:
20 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Investment in real estate | $ | 127,443 | ||
Resident lease intangibles | 16,454 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 110 | |||
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other payables | (2,431 | ) | ||
141,576 | ||||
Mortgage notes payable | (88,400 | ) | ||
Net cash paid for acquisition | $ | 53,176 |
In determining the allocation of the purchase price between net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, management made estimates of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities using information obtained as a result of pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing, leasing activities, and independent appraisals. The fair value of the tangible assets acquired is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. Management allocated the purchase price to net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values. The determination of fair value involved the use of significant judgment and estimation.
The following is a summary of the significant accounting policies related to the senior living facilities:
Investments in Real Estate
Newcastle recorded the acquired facilities at their estimated fair value. Depreciation on the senior living facilities is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
Asset Categories | Estimated Useful Life |
Land | N/A |
Buildings | 40 years |
Building improvements | 3-10 years |
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 3-5 years |
Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Renovations and improvements which improve and/or extend the life of the assets are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Newcastle will periodically assess the carrying value of the senior living facilities to determine if facts and circumstances exist that would suggest that assets might be impaired or that the useful lives should be modified. In the event that an impairment in value occurs and we believe that the carrying amount of the facilities will not be recovered, a provision will be recorded to reduce the carrying basis of the facilities to their estimated fair value. The following table summarizes Newcastle’s investments in senior living real estate as of September 30, 2012:
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Depreciation | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
Land | $ | 11,630 | $ | — | $ | 11,630 | ||||||
Buildings | 113,519 | (580 | ) | 112,939 | ||||||||
Building improvements | 1,959 | (54 | ) | 1,905 | ||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 361 | (37 | ) | 324 | ||||||||
Total | $ | 127,469 | $ | (671 | ) | $ | 126,798 |
21 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Resident Lease Intangibles
Resident lease intangibles reflect the fair value of in-place resident leases at acquisition. Newcastle estimates the fair value of in-place leases as (i) the present value of the estimated rents that would have been forgone, offset by variable costs that would have otherwise been incurred during a reasonable lease-up period, as if the acquired units were vacant, and (ii) the estimated absorption costs, such as additional marketing costs that would have been incurred during the lease-up period. The acquisition fair value of the in-place resident lease intangibles is amortized over the average length of stay of the residents at the senior living facilities of 24 months on a straight-line basis. Newcastle will periodically assess the carrying value of the resident lease intangibles to determine if facts and circumstances exist that would suggest that the intangible assets might be impaired or that the useful lives should be modified. In the event an impairment in value occurs and we believe that the carrying amount will not be recovered, a provision will be recorded to reduce the carrying basis of the resident lease intangibles to their estimated fair value.
As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle’s resident lease intangibles are detailed as follows:
Gross Carrying Amount | Accumulated Amortization | Net Carrying Value | ||||||||||
In-place resident lease intangibles | $ | 16,454 | $ | (1,699 | ) | $ | 14,755 |
Rental Revenue, Care and Ancillary Income Recognition
Newcastle records rental revenue, care and ancillary income as they become due as provided for in the residents’ leases.
Community Fees
Community fees are non-refundable and initially recorded as deferred revenue and amortized over the average length of stay of the residents using the straight line method.
22 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
6. DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents certain information regarding Newcastle’s debt obligations and related hedges at September 30, 2012:
Unhedged | Face | Collateral | Aggregate Notional | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt Obligation/Collateral | Month Issued | Outstanding Face Amount | Carrying Value | Final Stated Maturity | Weighted Average Funding Cost (A) | Weighted Average Funding Cost (B) | Weighted Average Maturity (Years) | Amount of Floating Rate Debt | Outstanding Face Amount (C) | Amortized Cost Basis (C) | Carrying Value (C) | Weighted Average Maturity (Years) | Floating Rate Face Amount (C) | Amount of Current Hedges (D) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO Bonds Payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO IV (E) | Mar 2004 | $ | 86,983 | $ | 86,872 | Mar 2039 | 1.81 | % | 4.99 | % | 1.6 | $ | 76,103 | $ | 175,752 | $ | 165,292 | $ | 158,371 | 2.3 | $ | 48,891 | $ | 76,103 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO VI (E) | Apr 2005 | 91,469 | 91,469 | Apr 2040 | 0.87 | % | 5.35 | % | 4.9 | 88,437 | 208,094 | 119,483 | 145,273 | 3.0 | 51,154 | 88,437 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO VIII | Nov 2006 | 529,337 | 528,278 | Nov 2052 | 0.77 | % | 2.18 | % | 2.6 | 521,737 | 708,193 | 517,123 | 538,238 | 2.8 | 389,155 | 154,795 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO IX | May 2007 | 446,956 | 448,461 | May 2052 | 0.57 | % | 0.57 | % | 2.6 | 446,956 | 672,126 | 543,431 | 551,501 | 2.8 | 328,276 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1,154,745 | 1,155,080 | 2.02 | % | 2.7 | 1,133,233 | 1,764,165 | 1,345,329 | 1,393,383 | 2.7 | 817,476 | 319,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Bonds and Notes Payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MH loans Portfolio I (F) | Apr 2010 | 73,431 | 69,441 | Jul 2035 | 6.20 | % | 6.20 | % | 4.2 | — | 122,453 | 102,746 | 102,746 | 6.9 | 978 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MH loans Portfolio II | May 2011 | 123,797 | 122,961 | Dec 2033 | 4.35 | % | 4.35 | % | 4.0 | — | 158,542 | 155,933 | 155,933 | 5.7 | 26,834 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage Loans (G) | Aug 2006 | 5,181 | 5,181 | Dec 2034 | LIBOR+ 0.90% | 1.11 | % | 6.4 | 5,181 | 53,384 | 39,208 | 39,208 | 6.6 | 53,384 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
202,409 | 197,583 | 4.92 | % | 4.2 | 5,181 | 334,379 | 297,887 | 297,887 | 6.3 | 81,196 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements (H) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO securities (I) | Dec 2011 | 7,157 | 7,157 | Oct 2012 | LIBOR+ 2.00% | 2.21 | % | 0.0 | 7,157 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-agency RMBS (J) | Jul 2012 | 59,646 | 59,646 | Oct 2012 | LIBOR+ 2.00% | 2.21 | % | 0.0 | 59,646 | 127,549 | 87,580 | 90,428 | 2.8 | 127,549 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FNMA/FHLMC securities (K) | Various | 538,524 | 538,524 | Oct 2012 | 0.42 | % | 0.42 | % | 0.1 | 538,524 | 534,801 | 572,356 | 577,132 | 4.3 | 534,801 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
605,327 | 605,327 | 0.62 | % | 0.1 | 605,327 | 662,350 | 659,936 | 667,560 | 4.0 | 662,350 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage Notes Payable | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior living facilities | Jul 2012 | 88,400 | 88,400 | Aug 2019 | 3.45 | % | 3.45 | % | 6.5 | 23,400 | N/A | 141,553 | 141,553 | N/A | — | 23,400 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
88,400 | 88,400 | 3.45 | % | 6.5 | 23,400 | N/A | 141,553 | 141,553 | N/A | — | 23,400 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated notes payable | Mar 2006 | 51,004 | 51,245 | Apr 2035 | 7.57% (M) | 7.41 | % | 22.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
51,004 | 51,245 | 7.41 | % | 22.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subtotal debt obligations | 2,101,885 | 2,097,635 | 2.08 | % | 2.7 | $ | 1,767,141 | $ | 2,760,894 | $ | 2,444,705 | $ | 2,500,383 | 3.5 | $ | 1,561,022 | $ | 342,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financing on subprime mortgage loans subject to call option | (L) | 406,217 | 405,525 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt obligations | $ | 2,508,102 | $ | 2,503,160 |
(A) | Weighted average, including floating and fixed rate classes and including the amortization of deferred financing costs. |
(B) | Including the effect of applicable hedges. |
(C) | Excluding (i) restricted cash held in CDOs to be used for principal and interest payments of CDO debt, and (ii) operating cash in senior living entities. |
(D) | Including a $23.4 million notional amount of interest rate cap agreement for the mortgage notes payable and a $76.1 million and $88.4 million notional amount of interest rate swap agreements in CDO IV and CDO VI, respectively, which were economic hedges not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. |
(E) | CDO VI was not in compliance with its applicable over collateralization tests as of September 30, 2012. Newcastle is not receiving cash flows from these CDOs (other than senior management fees and cash flows on senior classes of bonds that were repurchased), since net interest is being used to repay debt, and expects CDO VI to remain out of compliance for the foreseeable future. |
(F) | Excluding $20.5 million face amount of other bonds payable relating to MH loans Portfolio I sold to certain Newcastle CDOs, which were eliminated in consolidation. |
(G) | Excluding $6.6 million face amount of notes payable relating to residential mortgage loans sold to a Newcastle CDO, which were eliminated in consolidation. |
(H) | These repurchase agreements had $0.1 million of associated accrued interest payable at September 30, 2012. $395.3 million face amount of these repurchase agreements were renewed subsequent to September 30, 2012. |
(I) | The counterparty of this repurchase agreement is Bank of America. It is secured by $26.4 million face amount of senior notes issued by Newcastle CDO VI, which is eliminated in consolidation. The maximum recourse to Newcastle is $1.8 million. |
(J) | The counterparty of these repurchase agreements is Credit Suisse. |
(K) | The counterparties on these repurchase agreements are Bank of America, Citi, and Goldman Sachs. Interest rates on these repurchase agreements are fixed, but will be reset on a short-term basis. |
(L) | Issued in April 2006 and July 2007. See Note 4 regarding the securitizations of Subprime Portfolios I and II. |
(M) | LIBOR + 2.25% after April 2016. |
23 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Each CDO financing is subject to tests that measure the amount of over collateralization and excess interest in the transaction. Failure to satisfy these tests would cause the principal and/or interest cashflow that would otherwise be distributed to more junior classes of securities (including those held by Newcastle) to be redirected to pay down the most senior class of securities outstanding until the tests are satisfied. As a result, our cash flow and liquidity are negatively impacted upon such a failure. As of September 30, 2012, CDO VI was not in compliance with its over collateralization tests.
In the first nine months of 2012, Newcastle repurchased $34.1 million face amount of CDO bonds payable for $10.8 million. As a result, Newcastle extinguished $34.1 million face amount of CDO bonds payable and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $23.1 million.
Newcastle’s non-CDO financings contain various customary loan covenants. Newcastle was in compliance with all of the covenants in its non-CDO financings as of September 30, 2012.
24 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
7. FAIR VALUE
Fair Value Summary Table
The carrying values and fair values of Newcastle’s assets and liabilities at September 30, 2012 were as follows:
Principal | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance or | Estimated | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Notional | Carrying | Fair | Yield/Funding | Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Value | Fair Value Method (A) | Cost | (Years) | |||||||||||||||||
Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures (F) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate securities, available-for-sale* | $ | 731,415 | $ | 591,929 | $ | 591,929 | Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models | 8.64 | % | 3.5 | ||||||||||||
Real estate related loans, held-for-sale, net | 1,074,133 | 832,885 | 840,122 | Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models | 12.63 | % | 2.2 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage loans, held-for-investment, net | 338,158 | 301,370 | 302,073 | Pricing models | 8.19 | % | 6.2 | |||||||||||||||
Subprime mortgage loans subject to call option (B) | 406,217 | 405,525 | 405,525 | (B) | 9.09 | % | (B) | |||||||||||||||
Restricted cash* | 2,829 | 2,829 | 2,829 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating real estate, held-for-sale | 7,839 | 7,839 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments | 18,883 | 18,883 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables and other assets | 6,432 | 6,432 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 2,167,692 | $ | 2,175,632 | |||||||||||||||||||
Recourse Financing Structures, Mortgaged Real Estate and Unlevered Assets | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate securities, available-for-sale* | $ | 1,027,954 | $ | 788,431 | $ | 788,431 | Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models | 3.01 | % | 3.9 | ||||||||||||
Real estate related loans, held-for-sale, net | 28,801 | 9,418 | 9,418 | Broker quotations, counterparty quotations, pricing services, pricing models | 6.51 | % | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||
Residential mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net | 3,735 | 2,566 | 2,566 | Pricing models | 16.85 | % | 4.7 | |||||||||||||||
Investments in excess mortgage servicing rights at fair value *(H) | 79,629,020 | 258,347 | 258,347 | Pricing models | 17.60 | % | 5.5 | |||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents* | 229,036 | 229,036 | 229,036 | |||||||||||||||||||
Non-hedge derivative assets (D)(E)* | 23,400 | 224 | 224 | Counterparty quotations | N/A | (D) | ||||||||||||||||
Investments in real estate and | 141,553 | 143,300 | Based on recent purchase price in July 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
resident lease intangibles, net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other investments | 6,024 | 6,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Receivables and other assets | 33,571 | 33,571 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,469,170 | $ | 1,470,917 |
25 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Principal Balance | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||
or | Estimated | Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Notional | Carrying | Fair | Yield/Funding | Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Value | Fair Value Method (A) | Cost | (Years) | |||||||||||||||||
Liabilities | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Recourse VIE Financing Structures (F) (G) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO bonds payable | $ | 1,154,745 | $ | 1,155,080 | $ | 802,107 | Pricing models | 2.02 | % | 2.7 | ||||||||||||
Other bonds and notes payable | 202,409 | 197,583 | 204,991 | Broker quotations, pricing models | 4.92 | % | 4.2 | |||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements | 5,368 | 5,368 | 5,368 | Market comparables | 2.21 | % | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||
Financing of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option (B) | 406,217 | 405,525 | 405,525 | (B) | 9.09 | % | (B) | |||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps, treated as hedges (C)(E)* | 154,795 | 14,009 | 14,009 | Counterparty quotations | N/A | (C) | ||||||||||||||||
Non-hedge derivatives (D)(E)* | 296,532 | 22,510 | 22,510 | Counterparty quotations | N/A | (D) | ||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities | 8,241 | 8,241 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 1,808,316 | $ | 1,462,751 | |||||||||||||||||||
Recourse Financing Structures, Mortgages and Other Liabilities (G) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial instruments: | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase agreements | $ | 599,959 | $ | 599,959 | $ | 599,959 | Market comparables | 0.60 | % | 0.1 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage notes payable | 88,400 | 88,400 | 88,400 | Pricing models | 3.45 | % | 6.5 | |||||||||||||||
Junior subordinated notes payable | 51,004 | 51,245 | 31,588 | Pricing models | 7.41 | % | 22.6 | |||||||||||||||
Due to affiliates | 3,351 | 3,351 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 51,405 | 51,405 | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 794,360 | $ | 774,703 |
*Measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
26 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
(A) | Methods are listed in order of priority. In the case of real estate securities and real estate related loans, broker quotations are obtained if available and practicable, otherwise counterparty quotations or pricing service valuations are obtained or, finally, internal pricing models are used. Internal pricing models are only used for (i) securities and loans that are not traded in an active market, and, therefore, have little or no price transparency, and for which significant unobservable inputs must be used in estimating fair value, or (ii) loans or debt obligations which are private and untraded. |
(B) | These two items result from an option, not an obligation, to repurchase loans from Newcastle’s subprime mortgage loan securitizations (Note 4), are noneconomic until such option is exercised, and are equal and offsetting. |
(C) | Represents derivative agreements as follows: |
Year of Maturity | Weighted Average Month of Maturity | Aggregate Notional Amount | Weighted Average Fixed Pay Rate / Cap Rate | Aggregate Fair Value Asset / (Liability) | ||||
Interest rate swap agreements which receive 1-Month LIBOR: | ||||||||
2016 | Apr | $ 154,795 | 5.04% | $ (14,009) |
(D) | This represents two interest rate swap agreements with a total notional balance of $296.5 million, maturing in March 2014 and March 2015, respectively, and an interest rate cap agreement with a notional balance of $23.4 million, maturing in August 2019. Newcastle entered into these agreements to reduce its exposure to interest rate changes on the floating rate financings of CDO IV, CDO VI and the senior living assets. These derivative agreements were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes as of September 30, 2012. |
(E) | Newcastle’s derivatives fall into two categories. As of September 30, 2012, all derivatives were held within Newcastle’s nonrecourse structures. An aggregate notional balance of $451.3 million, which were liabilities at period end, are only subject to the credit risks of the respective CDO structures. As they are senior to all the debt obligations of the respective CDOs and the fair value of each of the CDOs’ total investments exceeded the fair value of each of the CDOs’ derivative liabilities, no credit valuation adjustments were recorded. An aggregate notional balance of $23.4 million were assets at period end and therefore are subject to the counterparty’s credit risk. No adjustments have been made to the fair value quotations received related to credit risk as a result of the counterparty’s “AA” credit rating. Newcastle’s significant derivative counterparties include Bank of America, Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo. |
(F) | Assets held within CDOs and other non-recourse structures are not available to satisfy obligations outside of such financings, except to the extent Newcastle receives net cash flow distributions from such structures. Furthermore, creditors or beneficial interest holders of these structures have no recourse to the general credit of Newcastle. Therefore, Newcastle’s exposure to the economic losses from such structures is limited to its invested equity in them and economically their book value cannot be less than zero. As a result, the fair value of Newcastle’s net investments in these non-recourse financing structures is equal to the present value of their expected future net cash flows. |
(G) | Newcastle notes that the unrealized gain on the liabilities within such structures cannot be fully realized. |
(H) | The notional amount represents the total unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. Generally, Newcastle does not receive an excess mortgage servicing amount on nonperforming loans. |
27 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Valuation Hierarchy
The methodologies used for valuing such instruments have been categorized into three broad levels, which form a hierarchy.
Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical instruments.
Level 2 - Valuations based principally on other observable market parameters, including
| Quoted prices in active markets for similar instruments, | |
| Quoted prices in less active or inactive markets for identical or similar instruments, | |
| Other observable inputs (such as interest rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates), and | |
| Market corroborated inputs (derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data). |
Level 3 - Valuations based significantly on unobservable inputs.
| Level 3A - Valuations based on third party indications (broker quotes, counterparty quotes or pricing services) which were, in turn, based significantly on unobservable inputs or were otherwise not supportable as Level 2 valuations. | |
| Level 3B - Valuations based on internal models with significant unobservable inputs. |
Newcastle follows this hierarchy for its financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The classifications are based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table summarizes such financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2012:
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Principal Balance or Notional Amount | Carrying Value | Level 2 | Level 3A | Level 3B | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate securities, available-for-sale: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS | $ | 484,684 | $ | 377,752 | $ | — | $ | 329,088 | $ | 48,664 | $ | 377,752 | ||||||||||||
REIT debt | 87,700 | 93,060 | 93,060 | — | — | 93,060 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS - subprime | 438,269 | 260,439 | — | 220,816 | 39,623 | 260,439 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS - other real estate | 10,208 | 1,576 | — | 854 | 722 | 1,576 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA / FHLMC | 534,801 | 577,132 | 577,132 | — | — | 577,132 | ||||||||||||||||||
CDO | 203,707 | 70,401 | — | 64,930 | 5,471 | 70,401 | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate securities total | $ | 1,759,369 | $ | 1,380,360 | $ | 670,192 | $ | 615,688 | $ | 94,480 | $ | 1,380,360 | ||||||||||||
Investments in Excess MSRs (1) | $ | 79,629,020 | $ | 258,347 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 258,347 | $ | 258,347 | ||||||||||||
Derivative assets: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate caps, not treated as hedges | 23,400 | 224 | 224 | — | — | 224 | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivative assets total | $ | 23,400 | $ | 224 | $ | 224 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 224 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivative Liabilities: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps, treated as hedges | $ | 154,795 | $ | 14,009 | $ | 14,009 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 14,009 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps, not treated as hedges | 296,532 | 22,510 | 22,510 | — | — | 22,510 | ||||||||||||||||||
Derivative liabilities total | $ | 451,327 | $ | 36,519 | $ | 36,519 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 36,519 |
(1) | The notional amount represents the total unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. Generally, Newcastle does not receive an excess mortgage servicing amount on nonperforming loans. |
28 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Newcastle’s investments in instruments (excluding the Excess MSRs, see below) measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs changed during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 as follows:
Level 3A | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS | ABS | Equity/Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conduit | Other | Subprime | Other | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 816,283 | $ | 132,435 | $ | 66,141 | $ | 31,188 | $ | 52,047 | $ | 1,098,094 | ||||||||||||
Transfers (A) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Level 3B | 6,056 | 4,057 | 10,178 | — | — | 20,291 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers into Level 3B | (10,748 | ) | (14,105 | ) | (11,057 | ) | (5 | ) | — | (35,915 | ) | |||||||||||||
CDO X deconsolidation | (634,036 | ) | (40,172 | ) | (70,607 | ) | (25,883 | ) | — | (770,698 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total gains (losses) (B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in net income (C) | 1,190 | — | (8 | ) | — | — | 1,182 | |||||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | 28,071 | 9,596 | 14,913 | (650 | ) | 13,341 | 65,271 | |||||||||||||||||
Amortization included in interest income | 22,608 | 1,164 | 6,457 | (11 | ) | 3,985 | 34,203 | |||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales and repayments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 71,968 | — | 228,832 | — | — | 300,800 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales | (24,551 | ) | — | — | — | — | (24,551 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from repayments | (37,732 | ) | (2,996 | ) | (24,033 | ) | (3,785 | ) | (4,443 | ) | (72,989 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | 239,109 | $ | 89,979 | $ | 220,816 | $ | 854 | $ | 64,930 | $ | 615,688 |
Level 3B | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS | ABS | Equity/Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Conduit | Other | Subprime | Other | Securities | Total | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 | $ | 140,622 | $ | 39,478 | $ | 62,481 | $ | 6,919 | $ | 3,939 | $ | 253,439 | ||||||||||||
Transfers (A) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers from Level 3A | 10,748 | 14,105 | 11,057 | 5 | — | 35,915 | ||||||||||||||||||
Transfers into Level 3A | (6,056 | ) | (4,057 | ) | (10,178 | ) | — | — | (20,291 | ) | ||||||||||||||
CDO X deconsolidation | (133,624 | ) | — | (16,097 | ) | (291 | ) | — | (150,012 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total gains (losses) (B) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Included in net income (C) | (1,941 | ) | (396 | ) | 836 | (4,092 | ) | — | (5,593 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Included in other comprehensive income (loss) | (12,004 | ) | 980 | (1,766 | ) | 2,123 | 1,508 | (9,159 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Amortization included in interest income | 8,016 | 339 | 5,651 | 164 | 304 | 14,474 | ||||||||||||||||||
Purchases, sales and repayments | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 44,119 | — | — | — | — | 44,119 | ||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales | (18,708 | ) | — | (3,295 | ) | (3,743 | ) | — | (25,746 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Proceeds from repayments | (17,372 | ) | (15,585 | ) | (9,066 | ) | (363 | ) | (280 | ) | (42,666 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2012 | $ | 13,800 | $ | 34,864 | $ | 39,623 | $ | 722 | $ | 5,471 | $ | 94,480 |
(A) | Transfers are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarter. CDO X was deconsolidated on September 12, 2012. | |
(B) | None of the gains (losses) recorded in earnings during the period is attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date. | |
(C) | These gains (losses) are recorded in the following line items in the consolidated statements of income: |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 | ||||||||
Level 3A | Level 3B | |||||||
Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net | $ | 1,196 | $ | 8,986 | ||||
Other income (loss), net | — | — | ||||||
OTTI | (14 | ) | (14,579 | ) | ||||
Total | $ | 1,182 | $ | (5,593 | ) | |||
Gain (loss) on settlement of investments, net, from investments transferred into Level 3 during the period | $ | — | $ | — |
29 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Securities Valuation
As of September 30, 2012, Newcastle’s securities valuation methodology and results are further detailed as follows:
Fair Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Amortized | Internal | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Face | Cost | Multiple | Single | Pricing | ||||||||||||||||||||
Asset Type | Amount (A) | Basis (B) | Quotes (C) | Quote (D) | Models (E) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
CMBS | $ | 484,684 | $ | 346,736 | $ | 296,337 | $ | 32,751 | $ | 48,664 | $ | 377,752 | ||||||||||||
REIT debt | 87,700 | 86,916 | 22,747 | 70,313 | — | 93,060 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS - subprime | 438,269 | 241,693 | 185,490 | 35,326 | 39,623 | 260,439 | ||||||||||||||||||
ABS - other real estate | 10,208 | 1,915 | — | 854 | 722 | 1,576 | ||||||||||||||||||
FNMA / FHLMC | 534,801 | 572,356 | 511,248 | 65,884 | — | 577,132 | ||||||||||||||||||
CDO | 203,707 | 67,190 | 3,960 | 60,970 | 5,471 | 70,401 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,759,369 | $ | 1,316,806 | $ | 1,019,782 | $ | 266,098 | $ | 94,480 | $ | 1,380,360 |
(A) | Net of incurred losses |
(B) | Net of discounts (or gross of premiums) and after OTTI, including impairment taken during the period ended September 30, 2012. |
(C) | Management generally obtained pricing service quotations or broker quotations from two sources, one of which was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security). Management selected one of the quotes received as being most representative of fair value and did not use an average of the quotes. Even if Newcastle receives two or more quotes on a particular security that come from non-selling brokers or pricing services, it does not use an average because management believes using an actual quote more closely represents a transactable price for the security than an average level. Furthermore, in some cases there is a wide disparity between the quotes Newcastle receives. Management believes using an average of the quotes in these cases would generally not represent the fair value of the asset. Based on Newcastle’s own fair value analysis using internal models, management selects one of the quotes which is believed to more accurately reflect fair value. Newcastle never adjusts quotes received. These quotations are generally received via email and contain disclaimers which state that they are “indicative” and not “actionable” – meaning that the party giving the quotation is not bound to actually purchase the security at the quoted price. |
(D) | Management was unable to obtain quotations from more than one source on these securities. The one source was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security) or a pricing service. |
(E) | Securities whose fair value was estimated based on internal pricing models are further detailed as follows: |
Impairment | Unrealized Gains | Assumption Ranges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortized | Recorded | (Losses) in | Cumulative | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | In Current | Accumulated | Discount | Prepayment | Default | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basis (B) | Fair Value | Period | OCI | Rate | Speed (F) | Rate | Severity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS - Conduit | $ | 7,083 | $ | 13,800 | $ | 208 | $ | 6,717 | 10% | N/A | 13% - 100% | 27% - 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||
CMBS - Large loan / single borrower | 36,115 | 34,864 | — | (1,251 | ) | 5% - 9% | N/A | 0% - 100% | 0% - 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
ABS - subprime | 29,176 | 39,623 | 719 | 10,447 | 8% | 0% - 13% | 24% - 85% | 60% - 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABS - other RE | 745 | 722 | 64 | (23 | ) | 8% | 1% - 4% | 30% - 46% | 95% - 100% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CDO | 4,246 | 5,471 | — | 1,225 | 10% - 35% | 5% | 13% | 80% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 77,365 | 94,480 | 991 | 17,115 |
All of the assumptions listed have some degree of market observability, based on Newcastle’s knowledge of the market, relationships with market participants, and use of common market data sources. Collateral prepayment, default and loss severity projections are in the form of “curves” or “vectors” that vary for each monthly collateral cash flow projection. Methods used to develop these projections vary by asset class (e.g., CMBS projections are developed differently than home equity ABS projections) but conform to industry conventions. Newcastle uses assumptions that generate its best estimate of future cash flows of each respective security.
The prepayment vector specifies the percentage of the collateral balance that is expected to voluntarily pay off at each point in the future. The prepayment vector is based on projections from a widely published investment bank model which considers factors such as collateral FICO score, loan-to-value ratio, debt-to-income ratio, and vintage on a loan level basis. This vector is scaled up or down to match recent collateral-specific prepayment experience, as obtained from remittance reports and market data services.
Loss severities are based on recent collateral-specific experience with additional consideration given to collateral characteristics. Collateral age is taken into consideration because severities tend to initially increase with collateral age before eventually stabilizing. Newcastle typically uses projected severities that are higher than the historic experience for collateral that is relatively new to account for this effect. Collateral characteristics such as loan size, lien position, and location (state) also effect loss severity. Newcastle considers whether a collateral pool has experienced a significant change in its composition with respect to these factors when assigning severity projections.
Default rates are determined from the current “pipeline” of loans that are more than 90 days delinquent, in foreclosure, or are real estate owned (REO). These significantly delinquent loans determine the first 24 months of the default vector. Beyond month 24, the default vector transitions to a steady-state value that is generally equal to or greater than that given by the widely published investment bank model.
The discount rates Newcastle uses are derived from a range of observable pricing on securities backed by similar collateral and offered in a live market. As the markets in which Newcastle transacts have become less liquid, Newcastle has had to rely on fewer data points in this analysis.
(F) | Projected annualized average prepayment rate. |
30 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Loan Valuation
Loans which Newcastle does not have the ability or intent to hold into the foreseeable future are classified as held-for-sale. As a result, these held-for-sale loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value and are therefore recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis. These loans were written down to fair value at the time of the impairment, based on broker quotations, pricing service quotations or internal pricing models. All the loans were within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For real estate related loans, the most significant inputs used in the valuations are the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, market yields and the estimated collateral value of such loan investments. For residential mortgage loans, significant inputs include management’s expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities and discount rates that market participants would use in determining the fair values of similar pools of residential mortgage loans.
The following tables summarize certain information for real estate related loans and residential mortgage loans held-for-sale as of September 30, 2012:
Valuation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Allowance/ | Significant Input Ranges | ||||||||||||||||||||
Face | Carrying | Fair | (Reversal) In | Discount | Loss | |||||||||||||||||
Loan Type | Amount | Value | Value | Current Year | Rate | Severity | ||||||||||||||||
Mezzanine | $ | 530,343 | $ | 443,269 | $ | 449,847 | $ | 7,158 | 8.0% - 25.0% | 0.0% - 100.0% | ||||||||||||
Bank Loan | 334,855 | 180,044 | 180,044 | (13,969 | ) | 6.2% - 31.7% | 0.0% - 100.0% | |||||||||||||||
B-Note | 207,494 | 188,748 | 189,393 | (4,068 | ) | 6.2% - 15.0% | 0.0% | |||||||||||||||
Whole Loan | 30,242 | 30,242 | 30,256 | — | 5.1% - 7.1% | 0.0% - 15.0% | ||||||||||||||||
Total Real Estate Related Loans Held-for-Sale, Net | $ | 1,102,934 | $ | 842,303 | $ | 849,540 | $ | (10,879 | ) |
Valuation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Allowance/ (Reversal) | Significant Input Ranges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Face | Carrying | Fair | In | Discount | Prepayment | Constant | Loss | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Type | Amount | Value | Value | Current Year | Rate | Speed | Default Rate | Severity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-securitized Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio I | $ | 591 | $ | 151 | $ | 151 | $ | 16 | 38.9 | % | 0.0 | % | 52.9 | % | 75.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non-securitized Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio II | 3,144 | 2,415 | 2,415 | (498 | ) | 15.5 | % | 5.0 | % | 3.5 | % | 80.0 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale, Net | $ | 3,735 | $ | 2,566 | $ | 2,566 | $ | (482 | ) |
Loans which Newcastle has the intent and ability to hold into the foreseeable future are classified as held-for-investment. Loans held-for-investment are carried at the aggregate unpaid principal balance adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, deferred fees or expenses, an allowance for loan losses, charge-offs and write-downs for impaired loans.
The following table summarizes certain information for residential mortgage loans held-for-investment as of September 30, 2012:
Valuation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Reversal) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | In | Significant Input Ranges | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Type | Face Amount | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Current Year | Discount Rate | Prepayment Speed | Constant Default Rate | Loss Severity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loans Portoflio I | $ | 122,453 | $ | 102,745 | $ | 102,844 | $ | 135 | 9.5% | 4.0% | 4.0% | 75.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loans Portfolio II | 158,542 | 155,933 | 156,187 | 3,094 | 7.5% | 5.0% | 3.5% | 80.0% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential Loans | 57,163 | 42,692 | 43,042 | (28 | ) | 5.0% - 7.8% | 0.0% - 5.0% | 0.0% - 3.0% | 0.0% - 50.0% | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Residential Mortgage Loans, Held-for-Investment, Net | $ | 338,158 | $ | 301,370 | $ | 302,073 | $ | 3,201 |
31 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Excess MSRs Valuation
Fair value estimates of Newcastle’s Excess MSRs were based on internal pricing models. The valuation technique is based on discounted cash flows. Significant inputs used in the valuations included expectations of prepayment rates, delinquency rates, recapture rates, the excess mortgage servicing amount of the underlying mortgage loans, and discount rates that market participants would use in determining the fair values of mortgage servicing rights on similar pools of residential mortgage loans. In addition, in valuing the Excess MSRs, management considered the likelihood of Nationstar being removed as servicer, which likelihood is considered to be remote.
The following table summarizes certain information regarding the inputs used in valuing the Excess MSRs as of September 30, 2012:
Significant Input Ranges | ||||||||||||||||||
Prepayment Speed (A) | Delinquency (B) | Recapture Rate (C) | Excess Mortgage Servicing Amount (D) | Discount Rate | ||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 1 | 18.2 | % | 10.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 29 bps | 18.0 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 1 - Recapture Agreement | 8.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 21 bps | 18.0 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 2 | 17.4 | % | 11.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 23 bps | 17.3 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 2 - Recapture Agreement | 8.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 21 bps | 17.3 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 3 | 17.5 | % | 12.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 23 bps | 17.6 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 3 - Recapture Agreement | 8.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 21 bps | 17.6 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 4 | 19.0 | % | 16.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 17 bps | 17.9 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 4 - Recapture Agreement | 8.0 | % | 10.0 | % | 35.0 | % | 21 bps | 17.9 | % | |||||||||
MSR Pool 5 | 15.0 | % | N/A (E) | 35.0 | % | 13 bps | 17.5 | % | ||||||||||
MSR Pool 5 - Recapture Agreement | 8.0 | % | N/A (E) | 35.0 | % | 21 bps | 17.5 | % |
(A) | Projected annualized weighted average voluntary and involuntary prepayment rate using a prepayment vector. |
(B) | Projected percentage of mortgage loans in the pool that are expected to miss their mortgage payments. |
(C) | Percentage of voluntarily prepaid loans that are expected to be refinanced by Nationstar. |
(D) | Weighted average total mortgage servicing amount in excess of the basic fee. |
(E) | The Excess MSR will be paid on the total UPB of the mortgage portfolio (including both performing and delinquent loans until REO) |
All of the assumptions listed have some degree of market observability, based on Newcastle’s knowledge of the market, relationships with market participants, and use of common market data sources.
Prepayment speed projections are in the form of a “vector” that varies over the expected life of the pool. The prepayment vector specifies the percentage of the collateral balance that is expected to prepay voluntarily (i.e., pay off) and involuntarily (i.e., default) at each point in the future. The prepayment vector is based on assumptions that reflect factors such as the borrower’s FICO score, loan-to-value ratio, debt-to-income ratio, vintage on a loan level basis, as well as the projected effect on loans eligible for the Home Affordable Refinance Program 2.0 (“HARP 2.0”). This vector is scaled up or down to match recent collateral-specific prepayment experience. For the Recapture Agreements and recaptured loans, Newcastle also considers industry research on the prepayment experience of similar loan pools. This data is obtained from remittance reports, market data services and other market sources.
Delinquency rates are based on the recent pool-specific experience of loans that missed their most recent mortgage payments. For the Recapture Agreements and recaptured loans, delinquency rates are based on the experience of similar loan pools recently originated by Nationstar and recent delinquency experience. Additional consideration is given to loans that are expected to become 30 or more days delinquent.
Recapture rates are based on recent actual average recapture rates experienced by Nationstar on similar mortgage loan pools.
For existing mortgage pools, excess mortgage servicing amount projections are based on the actual total mortgage servicing amount in excess of a basic fee. For loans expected to be refinanced by Nationstar and subject to a Recapture Agreement, Newcastle considers the excess mortgage servicing amount on loans recently originated by Nationstar and other general market considerations.
The discount rates Newcastle uses are derived from a range of observable pricing on mortgage servicing rights backed by similar collateral.
32 |
NEWCASTLE INVESTMENT CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
(dollars in tables in thousands, except share data)
Newcastle’s MSRs investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3B inputs changed during the period ended September 30, 2012 as follows:
Level 3B (A) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
MSR Pool 1 | MSR Pool 2 |