REAL ESTATE RELATED LOANS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS, SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LOANS, CDO SERVICING RIGHTS AND INVESTMENTS IN EXCESS MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS |
4.
REAL ESTATE RELATED LOANS, RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE LOANS, SUBPRIME MORTGAGE LOANS, CDO SERVICING RIGHTS AND INVESTMENTS IN EXCESS
MORTGAGE SERVICING RIGHTS
The
following is a summary of real estate related loans, residential mortgage loans and subprime mortgage loans at March 31, 2012.
The loans contain various terms, including fixed and floating rates, self-amortizing and interest only. They are generally subject
to prepayment.
Loan Type |
|
Outstanding Face Amount |
|
|
Carrying Value (A) |
|
|
Loan Count |
|
|
Wtd. Avg. Yield |
|
|
Weighted Average Coupon |
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity (Years) (B) |
|
|
Floating Rate Loans as a % of Face Amount |
|
|
Delinquent Face Amount (C) |
|
Mezzanine Loans |
|
$ |
584,234 |
|
|
$ |
462,197 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10.14 |
% |
|
|
8.57 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
69.8 |
% |
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
Corporate Bank Loans |
|
|
295,638 |
|
|
|
183,526 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
19.40 |
% |
|
|
9.59 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
52.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
B-Notes |
|
|
187,017 |
|
|
|
162,635 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11.67 |
% |
|
|
5.13 |
% |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
% |
|
|
53,995 |
|
Whole Loans |
|
|
30,460 |
|
|
|
30,460 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5.19 |
% |
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total Real Estate Related Loans Held-for-Sale, Net |
|
$ |
1,097,349 |
|
|
$ |
838,818 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
12.28 |
% |
|
|
8.13 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
65.4 |
% |
|
$ |
65,995 |
|
Non-Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio I |
|
$ |
711 |
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
39.05 |
% |
|
|
8.09 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
$ |
166 |
|
Non-Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio II |
|
|
3,985 |
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
15.50 |
% |
|
|
10.12 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
% |
|
|
668 |
|
Total Residential Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale, Net (D) |
|
$ |
4,696 |
|
|
$ |
2,775 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
17.14 |
% |
|
|
9.81 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
$ |
834 |
|
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio I |
|
$ |
130,488 |
|
|
$ |
108,839 |
|
|
|
3,447 |
|
|
|
9.49 |
% |
|
|
8.66 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,657 |
|
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolio II |
|
|
171,858 |
|
|
|
168,837 |
|
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
7.55 |
% |
|
|
9.64 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
% |
|
|
2,681 |
|
Residential Loans |
|
|
59,419 |
|
|
|
43,671 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
7.57 |
% |
|
|
2.47 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
7,362 |
|
Total Residential Mortgage Loans Held-for-Investment, Net (D) (E) |
|
$ |
361,765 |
|
|
$ |
321,347 |
|
|
|
9,565 |
|
|
|
8.21 |
% |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
$ |
11,700 |
|
Subprime Mortgage Loans Subject to Call Option |
|
$ |
406,217 |
|
|
$ |
404,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Carrying
value includes interest receivable of $0.1 million for the residential housing loans and principal and interest receivable
of $5.8 million for the manufactured housing loans. |
(B) |
The weighted
average maturity is based on the timing of expected principal reduction on the assets. |
(C) |
Includes loans
that are 60 or more days past due (including loans that are in foreclosure, or borrowers in bankruptcy) or considered
real estate owned (REO). As of March 31, 2012, $124.1 million face amount of real estate related loans was on
non-accrual status. |
(D) |
Loans
acquired at a discount for credit quality. |
(E) |
The following
is an aging analysis of past due residential loans held-for-investment as of March 31, 2012: |
|
|
30-59 Days Past Due |
|
|
60-89 Days Past Due |
|
|
Over 90 Days Past Due |
|
|
Repossessed |
|
|
Total Past Due |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Total Outstanding Face Amount |
|
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portoflio I |
|
$ |
270 |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
|
$ |
480 |
|
|
$ |
625 |
|
|
$ |
1,927 |
|
|
$ |
128,561 |
|
|
$ |
130,488 |
|
Securitized Manufactured Housing Loan Portoflio II |
|
$ |
1,095 |
|
|
$ |
383 |
|
|
$ |
1,652 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
3,776 |
|
|
$ |
168,082 |
|
|
$ |
171,858 |
|
Residential Loans |
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
6,553 |
|
|
$ |
702 |
|
|
$ |
8,430 |
|
|
$ |
50,989 |
|
|
$ |
59,419 |
|
Newcastles
management monitors the credit qualities of the Manufactured Housing Loan Portfolios I and II primarily by using aging analyses,
current trends in delinquencies and actual loss incurrence rates.
The
following is a summary of real estate related loans by maturities at March 31, 2012:
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Year of Maturity (1) |
|
Face Amount |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Loans |
|
Delinquent (2) |
|
$ |
65,995 |
|
|
$ |
41,440 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Period from April 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 |
|
|
63,454 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
2013 |
|
|
36,137 |
|
|
|
26,933 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
2014 |
|
|
351,598 |
|
|
|
238,607 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
2015 |
|
|
238,898 |
|
|
|
197,135 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
2016 |
|
|
274,936 |
|
|
|
273,139 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
2017 |
|
|
49,702 |
|
|
|
46,490 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
16,629 |
|
|
|
14,797 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,097,349 |
|
|
$ |
838,818 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
(1) |
Based
on the final extended maturity date of each loan investment as of March 31, 2012. |
(2) |
Includes loans
that are non-performing, in foreclosure, or under bankruptcy. |
Activities
relating to the carrying value of our real estate loans and residential mortgage loans are as follows:
|
|
Held-for-Sale |
|
|
Held-for-Investment |
|
|
|
Real Estate Related Loans |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Loans |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Loans |
|
December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
813,580 |
|
|
$ |
2,687 |
|
|
$ |
331,236 |
|
Purchases / additional fundings |
|
|
45,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest accrued to principal balance |
|
|
5,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal paydowns |
|
|
(34,476 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(9,756 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation (allowance) reversal on loans |
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
Loss on repayment of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion of loan discount and other amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
Other |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
838,818 |
|
|
$ |
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
321,347 |
|
The
following is a rollforward of the related loss allowance.
|
|
Held-For-Sale |
|
|
Held-For-Investment |
|
|
|
Real Estate Related Loans |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Loans |
|
|
Residential Mortgage Loans (B) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
|
$ |
(228,017 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,461 |
) |
|
$ |
(26,075 |
) |
Charge-offs (A) |
|
|
17,648 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
2,447 |
|
Valuation (allowance) reversal on loans |
|
|
10,482 |
|
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
(1,648 |
) |
Balance at March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
(199,887 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,882 |
) |
|
$ |
(25,276 |
) |
(A) |
The charge-offs for real estate related loans
represent a loan which was paid off at a discounted price during the period. |
(B) |
The allowance
for credit losses was determined based on the guidance for loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality. |
CDO
Servicing Rights
In
February 2011, Newcastle, through one of its subsidiaries, purchased the management rights with respect to certain CBASS Investment
Management LLC (C-BASS) CDOs pursuant to a bankruptcy proceeding for $2.2 million. Newcastle initially recorded
the cost of acquiring the collateral management rights as a servicing asset and subsequently amortizes this asset in proportion
to, and over the period of, estimated net servicing income. Servicing assets are assessed for impairment on a quarterly basis,
with impairment recognized as a valuation allowance. Key economic assumptions used in measuring any potential impairment of the
servicing assets include the prepayment speeds of the underlying loans, default rates, loss severities and discount rates. During
the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, Newcastle recorded $0.08 million and $0.04 million of servicing
rights amortization and no servicing rights impairment. As of March 31, 2012, Newcastles servicing asset had a carrying
value of $2.0 million recorded in Receivables and Other Assets.
Investments
in Excess Mortgage Servicing Rights
In
December 2011, Newcastle entered into an agreement (MSR Agreement I) with Nationstar Mortgage LLC
(Nationstar), an affiliate of Newcastles manager, to purchase Excess MSRs from Nationstar. Nationstar
acquired the mortgage servicing rights on a pool of agency residential mortgage loans with an outstanding principal balance
of approximately $9.9 billion (MSR Portfolio I) on September 30, 2011. Nationstar is entitled to receive
an initial weighted average total mortgage servicing amount of 35 basis points (bps) on the performing unpaid principal
balance, as well as any ancillary income from MSR Portfolio I. Pursuant to MSR Agreement I, Nationstar performs all
servicing functions and advancing functions related to MSR Portfolio I for a base mortgage servicing fee of 6 bps.
Therefore, the remainder, or Excess MSRs are initially equal to a weighted average of 29 bps. Newcastle
acquired the right to receive 65% of the excess mortgage servicing amount on MSR Portfolio I and, subject to certain
limitations and pursuant to a loan replacement agreement (the Recapture Agreement), 65% of the excess mortgage
servicing amount on certain future mortgage loans originated by Nationstar, that represent refinancings of loans in MSR
Portfolio I (which loans then become part of MSR Portfolio I) for $43.7 million. Nationstar has co-invested, pari passu
with Newcastle, in 35% of the Excess MSRs. Nationstar, as servicer, also retains the ancillary income, the
servicing obligations and liabilities as the servicer. If Nationstar is terminated as the servicer, Newcastles
right to receive its portion of the excess mortgage servicing amount is also terminated. To the extent that Nationstar is
terminated as the servicer and receives a termination payment, Newcastle is entitled to a pro rata share, or 65%, of such
termination payment.
The
following is a summary of Newcastles excess MSRs:
|
|
March 31, 2012 |
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 |
|
|
Amortized Cost Basis |
|
Carrying Value (A) |
|
Weighted Average Yield |
|
Weighted Average Maturity (Years) (B) |
|
Changes in Fair Value Recorded in Other Income (Loss) |
MSR Portfolio I |
|
$ |
34,897 |
|
|
$ |
36,280 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,215 |
|
MSR Portfolio I - Recapture Agreement |
|
|
6,107 |
|
|
|
6,307 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
$ |
41,004 |
|
|
$ |
42,587 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,216 |
|
(A) |
Fair
value. |
(B) |
The weighted
average maturity is based on the timing of expected return of investments. |
The table
below summarizes the geographic distribution of the underlying residential mortgage loans of the Excess MSRs at March 31, 2012
(in thousands):
|
|
Outstanding |
|
|
Nonperforming (A) |
|
State Concentration |
|
Unpaid Principal Amount |
|
|
Percentage of Total Outstanding |
|
|
Unpaid Principal Amount |
|
|
Percentage of Total Nonperforming |
|
California |
|
$ |
1,829,213 |
|
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
$ |
144,163 |
|
|
|
21.5 |
% |
Florida |
|
|
1,050,543 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
% |
|
|
77,858 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
% |
Texas |
|
|
619,198 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
23,556 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
Arizona |
|
|
452,872 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
40,219 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
Virginia |
|
|
325,998 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
17,337 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
% |
Washigton |
|
|
306,343 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
26,395 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
New Jersey |
|
|
297,264 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
26,771 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
Maryland |
|
|
290,700 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
19,130 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
Illinois |
|
|
280,735 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
24,595 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
% |
Nevada |
|
|
262,206 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
% |
|
|
33,743 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
% |
Other U.S. |
|
|
3,719,200 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
235,738 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
$ |
9,434,272 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
669,505 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
(A) |
Represent
loans that missed their most recent payment and therefore Newcastle did not receive its excess servicing amount. |
Geographic
concentrations of investments expose Newcastle to the risk of economic downturns within the relevant states. Any such downturn
in a state where Newcastle holds significant investments could affect the underlying borrowers ability to make the mortgage
payment and therefore could have a meaningful, negative impact on Newcastles excess MSRs.
See
note 11 regarding the agreement to acquire an additional portfolio of Excess MSRs.
Securitization
of Subprime Mortgage Loans
The following
table presents information on the retained interests in Newcastles securitizations of subprime mortgage loans at March
31, 2012:
|
|
Subprime Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
II |
|
|
Total |
|
Total securitized loans (unpaid principal balance) (A) |
|
$ |
460,432 |
|
|
$ |
601,132 |
|
|
$ |
1,061,564 |
|
Loans subject to call option (carrying value) |
|
$ |
299,176 |
|
|
$ |
105,803 |
|
|
$ |
404,979 |
|
Retained interests (fair value) (B) |
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,043 |
|
(A) |
Average loan seasoning of 80 months and 62 months
for Subprime Portfolios I and II, respectively, at March 31, 2012. |
(B) |
The retained interests include retained bonds of the
securitizations. The fair value of which is estimated based on pricing models. Newcastles residual interests were
written off in 2010. The weighted average yield of the retained bonds was 8.39% as of March 31, 2012. |
Newcastle
has no obligation to repurchase any loans from either of its subprime securitizations. Therefore, it is expected that its exposure
to loss is limited to the carrying amount of its retained interests in the securitization entities, as described above. A subsidiary
of Newcastle gave limited representations and warranties with respect to Subprime Portfolio II and is required to pay the difference,
if any, between the repurchase price of any loan in such portfolio and the price required to be paid by a third party originator
for such loan. Such subsidiary, however, has no assets and does not have recourse to the general credit of Newcastle.
The
following table summarizes certain characteristics of the underlying subprime mortgage loans, and related financing, in the securitizations
as of March 31, 2012:
|
|
Subprime Portfolio |
|
|
|
I |
|
|
II |
|
Loan unpaid principal balance (UPB) |
|
$ |
460,432 |
|
|
$ |
601,132 |
|
Weighted average coupon rate of loans |
|
|
5.27 |
% |
|
|
4.63 |
% |
Delinquencies of 60 or more days (UPB) (A) |
|
$ |
111,208 |
|
|
$ |
171,102 |
|
Net credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012 |
|
$ |
9,822 |
|
|
$ |
11,106 |
|
Cumulative net credit losses |
|
$ |
202,691 |
|
|
$ |
232,959 |
|
Cumulative net credit losses as a % of original UPB |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
21.4 |
% |
Percentage of ARM loans (B) |
|
|
51.9 |
% |
|
|
64.9 |
% |
Percentage of loans with original loan-to-value ratio >90% |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
17.1 |
% |
Percentage of interest-only loans |
|
|
21.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Face amount of debt (C) |
|
$ |
456,432 |
|
|
$ |
601,132 |
|
Weighted average funding cost of debt (D) |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
(A) |
Delinquencies include loans 60 or more days
past due, in foreclosure, under bankruptcy filing or real estate owned. |
(B) |
ARM loans are adjustable-rate mortgage loans. An option ARM is
an adjustable-rate mortgage that provides the borrower with an option to choose from several payment amounts each month for
a specified period of the loan term. None of the loans in the subprime portfolios are option ARMs. |
(C) |
Excludes face amount of $4.0 million of retained notes for Subprime
Portfolio I at March 31, 2012. |
(D) |
Includes the effect of applicable hedges. |
Newcastle
received negligible cash inflows from the retained interests of Subprime Portfolios I and II during the three months ended March
31, 2012 and 2011.
The
loans subject to call option and the corresponding financing recognize interest income and expense based on the expected weighted
average coupons of the loans subject to call option at the call date of 9.24% and 8.68% for Subprime Portfolios I and II,
respectively.
|