REAL ESTATE SECURITIES |
3. REAL ESTATE SECURITIES
The following is a summary
of Newcastles real estate securities at September 30, 2011, all of which are classified as available-for-sale and
are, therefore, reported at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in other comprehensive income, except for securities
that are other-than-temporarily impaired.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Amortized
Cost Basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average |
|
|
|
|
Before
Impairment |
|
|
Other-Than-
Temporary
Impairment
(A) |
|
|
After
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
Value (B) |
|
|
Number
of
Securities |
|
|
Rating
(C) |
|
Coupon |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Maturity
(Years)
(D) |
|
|
Principal
Subordination
(E) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Type |
|
|
|
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS-Conduit |
|
$ |
1,284,683 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,125 |
|
|
$ |
(204,159 |
) |
|
$ |
878,966 |
|
|
$ |
89,119 |
|
|
$ |
(82,215 |
) |
|
$ |
885,870 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
BB |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
10.63 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
CMBS-
Single Borrower |
|
|
200,385 |
|
|
|
194,802 |
|
|
|
(12,364 |
) |
|
|
182,438 |
|
|
|
3,519 |
|
|
|
(18,283 |
) |
|
|
167,674 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
BB |
|
|
4.84 |
% |
|
|
5.96 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
% |
CMBS-Large
Loan |
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(454 |
) |
|
|
7,090 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
A |
|
|
1.64 |
% |
|
|
1.84 |
% |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
% |
REIT
Debt |
|
|
137,393 |
|
|
|
136,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,760 |
|
|
|
5,263 |
|
|
|
(7,672 |
) |
|
|
134,351 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
BB+ |
|
|
5.83 |
% |
|
|
5.69 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
ABS-Subprime
(F) |
|
|
270,430 |
|
|
|
230,742 |
|
|
|
(86,694 |
) |
|
|
144,048 |
|
|
|
14,479 |
|
|
|
(7,623 |
) |
|
|
150,904 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
B+ |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
10.47 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
% |
ABS-Manufactured
Housing |
|
|
31,446 |
|
|
|
30,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,614 |
|
|
|
1,541 |
|
|
|
(246 |
) |
|
|
31,909 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
BBB+ |
|
|
6.62 |
% |
|
|
7.52 |
% |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
41.1 |
% |
ABS-Franchise |
|
|
21,177 |
|
|
|
21,764 |
|
|
|
(10,895 |
) |
|
|
10,869 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
8,101 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
3.15 |
% |
|
|
6.21 |
% |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
24.6 |
% |
FNMA/FHLMC |
|
|
210,673 |
|
|
|
221,915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,915 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
(323 |
) |
|
|
222,558 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
AAA |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
1.41 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
CDO
(G) |
|
|
207,287 |
|
|
|
82,754 |
|
|
|
(14,861 |
) |
|
|
67,893 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
(10,655 |
) |
|
|
57,338 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
B- |
|
|
2.90 |
% |
|
|
7.96 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
Security Total /Average (H) |
|
|
2,371,020 |
|
|
|
2,010,020 |
|
|
|
(328,973 |
) |
|
|
1,681,047 |
|
|
|
115,462 |
|
|
|
(130,714 |
) |
|
|
1,665,795 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
BB+ |
|
|
4.57 |
% |
|
|
8.26 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
Securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,011,408 |
|
|
$ |
(329,249 |
) |
|
$ |
1,682,159 |
|
|
$ |
116,911 |
|
|
$ |
(130,714 |
) |
|
$ |
1,668,356 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Represents the cumulative impairment against amortized cost basis
recorded through earnings, net of the effect of the cumulative adjustment as a result of the adoption of new accounting guidance
on impairment in 2009. |
(B) |
See Note 6 regarding the estimation of fair value, which is equal
to carrying value for all securities. |
(C) |
Represents the weighted average of the ratings of all securities
in each asset type, expressed as an S&P equivalent rating. For each security rated by multiple rating agencies, the lowest
rating is used. Newcastle used an implied AAA rating for the FNMA/FHLMC securities. Ratings provided were determined by third
party rating agencies as of a particular date, may not be current and are subject to change (including a negative watch
assignment) at any time. |
(D) |
The weighted average maturity is based on the timing of expected
principal reduction on the assets. |
(E) |
Percentage of the outstanding face amount of securities that is
subordinate to Newcastles investments. |
(F) |
Includes the retained bonds with a face amount of $4.0 million
and a carrying value of $1.2 million from Securitization Trust 2006 (Note 4). |
(G) |
Includes two CDO bonds issued by a third party with a carrying
value of $50.1 million, four CDO bonds issued by CDO V (which has been deconsolidated) held as investments by Newcastle with
a carrying value of $4.6 million and seven CDO bonds issued by C-BASS with a carrying value of $2.6 million. |
(H) |
The total outstanding face amount of fixed rate securities was
$1.6 billion, and of floating rate securities was $0.8 billion. |
Unrealized losses that are considered
other-than-temporary are recognized currently in earnings. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, Newcastle recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges (OTTI) of $14.4 million (gross of $0.8 million of other-than-temporary impairment
recognized in other comprehensive income) with respect to real estate securities. Based on managements analysis of these
securities, the performance of the underlying loans and changes in market factors, Newcastle noted adverse changes in the expected
cash flows on certain of these securities and concluded that they were other-than-temporarily impaired. Any remaining unrealized
losses on Newcastles securities were primarily the result of changes in market factors, rather than issue-specific credit
impairment. The following table summarizes Newcastles securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30,
2011.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost Basis |
|
|
Gross
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average |
|
Securities in
an Unrealized
Loss
Position
|
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Before
Impairment |
|
|
Other-than-
Temporary
Impairment |
|
|
After
Impairment |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Number
of
Securities |
|
|
Rating |
|
|
Coupon |
|
|
Yield |
|
|
Maturity
(Years) |
|
Less
Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
Months |
|
$ |
785,986 |
|
|
$ |
683,937 |
|
|
$ |
(29,093 |
) |
|
$ |
654,844 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(65,688 |
) |
|
|
589,156 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
BBB |
|
|
|
4.60 |
% |
|
|
7.93 |
% |
|
|
5.4 |
|
Twelve
or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More
Months |
|
|
444,603 |
|
|
|
439,840 |
|
|
|
(7,439 |
) |
|
|
432,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,026 |
) |
|
|
367,375 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
BB |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,230,589 |
|
|
$ |
1,123,777 |
|
|
$ |
(36,532 |
) |
|
$ |
1,087,245 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(130,714 |
) |
|
$ |
956,531 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
|
4.76 |
% |
|
|
6.96 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newcastle performed an assessment
of all of its debt securities that are in an unrealized loss position (unrealized loss position exists when a securitys
amortized cost basis, excluding the effect of OTTI, exceeds its fair value) and determined the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost Basis |
|
|
Unrealized
Losses |
|
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
Credit
(B) |
|
|
Non-Credit (C) |
|
Securities
Newcastle intends to sell |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Securities
Newcastle is more likely than not to be required to sell (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Securities
Newcastle has no intent to sell and is not more likely than not to be required to sell: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
impaired securities |
|
|
29,270 |
|
|
|
33,153 |
|
|
|
(35,034 |
) |
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
Non
credit impaired securities |
|
|
927,261 |
|
|
|
1,054,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
debt securities in an unrealized loss position |
|
$ |
956,531 |
|
|
$ |
1,087,245 |
|
|
$ |
(35,034 |
) |
|
$ |
(130,714 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Newcastle may, at times, be more likely than not to be required
to sell certain securities for liquidity purposes. While the amount of the securities to be sold may be an estimate, and the
securities to be sold have not yet been identified, Newcastle must make its best estimate, which is subject to significant
judgment regarding future events, and may differ materially from actual future sales. |
(B) |
This amount is required to be recorded as other-than-temporary
impairment through earnings. In measuring the portion of credit losses, Newcastles management estimates the expected
cash flow for each of the securities. This evaluation includes a review of the credit status and the performance of the
collateral supporting those securities, including the credit of the issuer, key terms of the securities and the effect of
local, industry and broader economic trends. Significant inputs in estimating the cash flows include managements
expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates and loss severities. Credit losses are measured as the decline in the
present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the investments effective interest rate. |
(C) |
This amount represents unrealized losses on securities that are
due to non-credit factors and is required to be recorded through other comprehensive income. |
The following table summarizes the
activity related to credit losses on debt securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
$(60,688) |
|
|
|
Additions
for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was not previously recognized |
|
|
(5,198) |
|
|
|
Increases
to credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized and a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
(682) |
|
|
|
Additions
for credit losses on securities for which an OTTI was previously recognized without any portion of OTTI recognized in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
(25,798) |
|
|
|
Reduction
for credit losses on securities for which no OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income at the current measurement
date |
|
|
12,229 |
|
|
|
Reduction
for securities sold during the period |
|
|
37,833 |
|
|
|
Reduction
for securities deconsolidated during the period |
|
|
6,254 |
|
|
|
Reduction
for increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the security |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance of credit losses on debt securities for which a portion of an OTTI was recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
$(35,034) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30,
2011, Newcastle had $176.4 million of restricted cash held in CDO financing structures pending its reinvestment in real estate
securities and loans.
The table below summarizes
the geographic distribution of the collateral securing Newcastles CMBS and ABS at September 30, 2011 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
ABS |
|
Geographic
Location |
|
Outstanding Face Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
Outstanding Face Amount |
|
|
Percentage |
|
Western
U.S. |
|
$ |
570,296 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
% |
|
$ |
80,959 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
% |
Northeastern
U.S. |
|
|
267,648 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
59,840 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
Southeastern
U.S. |
|
|
275,104 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
% |
|
|
73,302 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Midwestern
U.S. |
|
|
171,334 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
49,060 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
% |
Southwestern
U.S. |
|
|
132,349 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
33,510 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
% |
Other |
|
|
16,564 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
26,382 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
% |
Foreign |
|
|
59,319 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,492,614 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
323,053 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic concentrations of
investments expose Newcastle to the risk of economic downturns within the relevant regions, particularly given the current unfavorable
market conditions. These market conditions may make regions more vulnerable to downturns in certain market factors. Any such downturn
in a region where Newcastle holds significant investments could have a material, negative impact on Newcastle.
|