FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
6. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value Summary
Table
Newcastle held the following
financial instruments at September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Balance or Notional Amount |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Fair Value Method (A) |
|
Weighted
Average Yield/Funding Cost |
|
|
Weighted
Average Maturity (Years) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Recourse
VIE Financing Structures (F) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate securities, available-for-sale* |
|
$ |
1,994,678 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,893 |
|
|
$ |
1,437,893 |
|
|
Broker quotations, counterparty quotations,
pricing services, pricing models |
|
|
9.28 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
|
Real
estate related loans, held-for-sale, net |
|
|
1,054,225 |
|
|
|
815,140 |
|
|
|
822,484 |
|
|
Broker quotations, counterparty quotations,
pricing services, pricing models |
|
|
13.63 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
|
Residential
mortgage loans, held-for-investment, net |
|
|
385,122 |
|
|
|
340,489 |
|
|
|
341,291 |
|
|
Pricing models |
|
|
8.11 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
|
Subprime
mortgage loans subject to call option (B) |
|
|
406,217 |
|
|
|
404,476 |
|
|
|
404,476 |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
|
|
(B |
) |
Restricted
cash* |
|
|
178,121 |
|
|
|
178,121 |
|
|
|
178,121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
assets, treated as hedges (C)(E)* |
|
|
104,205 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
|
1,384 |
|
|
Counterparty quotations |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(C |
) |
Non-hedge
derivative assets (D)(E)* |
|
|
36,428 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
Counterparty quotations |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(D |
) |
Operating
real estate, held-for-sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
7,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,883 |
|
|
|
18,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
23,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,228,946 |
|
|
$ |
3,237,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
Financing Structures and Unlevered Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate securities, available-for-sale* |
|
$ |
376,342 |
|
|
$ |
230,463 |
|
|
$ |
230,463 |
|
|
Broker quotations, counterparty quotations,
pricing services, pricing models |
|
|
1.80 |
% |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Real
estate related loans, held-for-sale, net |
|
|
69,634 |
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
Broker quotations, counterparty quotations,
pricing services, pricing models |
|
|
24.30 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
|
Residential
mortgage loans, held-for-sale, net |
|
|
6,182 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
Princing models |
|
|
17.72 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents* |
|
|
205,180 |
|
|
|
205,180 |
|
|
|
205,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
6,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
and other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
2,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
454,107 |
|
|
$ |
454,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Balance or
Notional
Amount |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Fair Value Method (A) |
|
Weighted
Average
Yield/Funding
Cost |
|
|
Weighted
Average
Maturity
(Years) |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Recourse
VIE Financing Structures (F) (G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO
bonds payable |
|
$ |
2,429,077 |
|
|
$ |
2,428,294 |
|
|
$ |
1,528,994 |
|
|
Pricing models |
|
|
2.99 |
% |
|
|
3.8 |
|
Other
bonds and notes payable |
|
|
212,373 |
|
|
|
210,033 |
|
|
|
213,454 |
|
|
Pricing models, broker quotation |
|
|
4.30 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
|
Repurchase
agreements |
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
|
8,764 |
|
|
Market comparables |
|
|
1.74 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Financing
of subprime mortgage loans subject to call option (B) |
|
|
406,217 |
|
|
|
404,476 |
|
|
|
404,476 |
|
|
(B) |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
|
|
(B |
) |
Interest
rate swaps, treated as hedges (C)(E)* |
|
|
992,673 |
|
|
|
99,531 |
|
|
|
99,531 |
|
|
Counterparty quotations |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(C |
) |
Non-hedge
derivatives (D)(E)* |
|
|
316,922 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
Counterparty quotations |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
(D |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,448 |
|
|
|
46,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,230,071 |
|
|
$ |
2,334,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recourse
Financing Structures and Other Liabilities (G) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase
agreements |
|
$ |
212,164 |
|
|
$ |
212,164 |
|
|
$ |
212,164 |
|
|
Market comparables |
|
|
0.33 |
% |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Junior
subordinated notes payable |
|
|
51,004 |
|
|
|
51,250 |
|
|
|
30,613 |
|
|
Pricing models |
|
|
7.41 |
% |
|
|
23.6 |
|
Due
to affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
1,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
19,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
284,457 |
|
|
$ |
263,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Measured at fair value on a recurring basis. |
(A) |
Methods are listed in order of priority.
In the case of real estate securities and real estate related loans, broker quotations are obtained if available and practicable,
otherwise counterparty quotations or pricing service valuations are obtained or, finally, internal pricing models are used.
Internal pricing models are only used for (i) securities and loans that are not traded in an active market, and, therefore,
have little or no price transparency, and for which significant unobservable inputs must be used in estimating fair value,
or (ii) loans or debt obligations which are private and untraded. |
(B) |
These two items result from an option,
not an obligation, to repurchase loans from Newcastles subprime mortgage loan securitizations (Note 4), are noneconomic
until such option is exercised, and are equal and offsetting. |
(C) |
Represents derivative agreements as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
of Maturity |
|
Weighted Average
Month of
Maturity |
|
|
Aggregate Notional
Amount |
|
|
Weighted Average
Fixed Pay Rate /
Cap Rate |
|
|
Aggregate
Fair Value
Asset /
(Liability) |
|
Interest
rate cap agreements which receive 1-Month LIBOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
Sep |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
$ |
192 |
|
2016 |
|
|
Jul |
|
|
|
77,905 |
|
|
|
2.66 |
% |
|
|
1,084 |
|
2017 |
|
|
Jan |
|
|
|
5,300 |
|
|
|
1.86 |
% |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,205 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swap agreements which receive 1-Month LIBOR: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
Dec |
|
|
$ |
91,401 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
$ |
(738 |
) |
2014 |
|
|
Nov |
|
|
|
15,313 |
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
|
|
(2,009 |
) |
2015 |
|
|
Apr |
|
|
|
531,770 |
|
|
|
5.44 |
% |
|
|
(35,956 |
) |
2016 |
|
|
May |
|
|
|
180,155 |
|
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
(22,857 |
) |
2017 |
|
|
Aug |
|
|
|
174,034 |
|
|
|
5.24 |
% |
|
|
(37,971 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
992,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(99,531 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(D) |
This represents two interest rate swap agreements with a total
notional balance of $316.9 million, maturing in March 2014 and March 2015, and three interest rate cap agreements with a total
notional balance of $36.4 million, maturing in August 2017 and January 2019. Newcastle entered into these hedge agreements
to reduce its exposure to interest rate changes on the floating rate financings of CDO IV, CDO VI and CDO X. These derivative
agreements were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes as of September 30, 2011. |
(E) |
Newcastles derivatives fall into two categories. As of
September 30, 2011, all derivatives were held within Newcastles nonrecourse CDO structures. An aggregate notional
balance of $1.3 billion, which were liabilities at period end, are only subject to the credit risks of the respective CDO
structures. As they are senior to all the debt obligations of the respective CDOs and the fair value of each of the CDOs
investments exceeded the fair value of the CDOs derivative liabilities, no credit valuation adjustments were recorded.
In addition, the credit ratings of two of Newcastles derivative counterparties were downgraded in the quarter ended
September 30, 2011. However, such downgrades had no impact on the fair value or on the respective CDOs as all of these
derivatives were a liability payable to the counterparties. An aggregate notional balance of $140.6 million were assets at
period end and therefore are subject to the counterpartys credit risk. No adjustments have been made to the fair value
quotations received related to credit risk as a result of the counterpartys AA credit rating. Newcastles
significant derivative counterparties include Bank of America, Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo. |
(F) |
Assets held within CDOs and other non-recourse structures are
not available to satisfy obligations outside of such financings, except to the extent Newcastle receives net cash flow distributions
from such structures. Furthermore, creditors or beneficial interest holders of these structures have no recourse to the general
credit of Newcastle. Therefore, Newcastles exposure to the economic losses from such structures is limited to its invested
equity in them and economically their book value cannot be less than zero. As a result, the fair value of Newcastles
net investments in these non-recourse financing structures is equal to the present value of their expected future net cash
flows. |
(G) |
Newcastle notes that the unrealized gain on the liabilities within
such structures cannot be fully realized. |
Valuation Hierarchy
The methodologies used for
valuing such instruments have been categorized into three broad levels which form a hierarchy.
Level 1 Quoted prices
in active markets for identical instruments.
Level 2 Valuations
based principally on other observable market parameters, including
|
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for similar
instruments, |
|
|
|
Quoted prices in less active or inactive
markets for identical or similar instruments, |
|
|
|
Other observable inputs (such as interest
rates, yield curves, volatilities, prepayment speeds, loss severities, credit risks and default rates), and |
|
|
|
Market corroborated inputs (derived principally
from or corroborated by observable market data). |
Level 3 Valuations
based significantly on unobservable inputs.
|
|
|
Level 3A Valuations based on third
party indications (broker quotes, counterparty quotes or pricing services) which were, in turn, based significantly on unobservable
inputs or were otherwise not supportable as Level 2 valuations. |
|
|
|
Level 3B Valuations based on internal
models with significant unobservable inputs. |
Newcastle follows this hierarchy
for its financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The classifications are based on the lowest level of
input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
The following table summarizes
such financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Balance
or Notional |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Level
2 |
|
|
Level 3A (1) |
|
|
Level 3B (2) |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate securities, available-for-sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
$ |
1,492,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,634 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
877,301 |
|
|
$ |
183,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,634 |
|
REIT
debt |
|
|
137,393 |
|
|
|
134,351 |
|
|
|
134,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,351 |
|
ABS
- subprime |
|
|
270,430 |
|
|
|
150,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,888 |
|
|
|
64,016 |
|
|
|
150,904 |
|
ABS
- other real estate |
|
|
52,623 |
|
|
|
40,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,566 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
40,010 |
|
FNMA
/ FHLMC |
|
|
210,673 |
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
CDO |
|
|
207,287 |
|
|
|
57,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,135 |
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
57,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
security total |
|
$ |
2,371,020 |
|
|
|
1,665,795 |
|
|
|
356,909 |
|
|
|
1,046,890 |
|
|
|
261,996 |
|
|
|
1,665,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate securities total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,668,356 |
|
|
$ |
356,909 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,890 |
|
|
$ |
264,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,668,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate caps, treated as hedges |
|
$ |
104,205 |
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
Interest
rate caps, not treated as hedges |
|
|
36,428 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
assets total |
|
$ |
140,633 |
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps, treated as hedges |
|
$ |
992,673 |
|
|
$ |
99,531 |
|
|
$ |
99,531 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
99,531 |
|
Interest
rate swaps, not treated as hedges |
|
|
316,922 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
liabilities total |
|
$ |
1,309,595 |
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Third party pricing sources with significant unobservable inputs. |
(2) |
Internal models with significant unobservable inputs. |
Newcastles investments in
instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 3 inputs changed during the nine months ended September 30,
2011 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level
3A |
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
ABS |
|
|
Equity/Other
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Conduit |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
840,227 |
|
|
$ |
331,904 |
|
|
$ |
83,582 |
|
|
$ |
36,193 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,291,906 |
|
Transfers
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
from Level 3B |
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
19,950 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,002 |
|
Transfers
into Level 3B |
|
|
(88,464 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,031 |
) |
|
|
(7,548 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
(113,518 |
) |
CDO
V deconsolidation |
|
|
(59,970 |
) |
|
|
(55,838 |
) |
|
|
(5,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(120,915 |
) |
Total
gains (losses) (B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in net income (C) |
|
|
42,641 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,100 |
|
Included
in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(106,312 |
) |
|
|
35,881 |
|
|
|
(7,443 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
(10,661 |
) |
|
|
(89,106 |
) |
Amortization
included in interest income |
|
|
17,078 |
|
|
|
5,567 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
1,995 |
|
|
|
28,915 |
|
Purchases,
sales and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
229,558 |
|
|
|
27,262 |
|
|
|
29,359 |
|
|
|
7,548 |
|
|
|
69,308 |
|
|
|
363,035 |
|
Proceeds
from sales |
|
|
(125,358 |
) |
|
|
(54,885 |
) |
|
|
(6,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186,816 |
) |
Proceeds
from repayments |
|
|
(36,910 |
) |
|
|
(159,993 |
) |
|
|
(15,821 |
) |
|
|
(3,957 |
) |
|
|
(8,032 |
) |
|
|
(224,713 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
721,824 |
|
|
$ |
155,477 |
|
|
$ |
86,888 |
|
|
$ |
32,566 |
|
|
$ |
50,135 |
|
|
$ |
1,046,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level
3B |
|
|
|
CMBS |
|
|
ABS |
|
|
Equity/Other
Securities |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Conduit |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2010 |
|
$ |
107,457 |
|
|
$ |
21,146 |
|
|
$ |
94,424 |
|
|
$ |
8,985 |
|
|
$ |
4,282 |
|
|
$ |
236,294 |
|
Transfers
(A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transfers
from Level 3A |
|
|
88,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,031 |
|
|
|
7,548 |
|
|
|
2,475 |
|
|
|
113,518 |
|
Transfers
into Level 3A |
|
|
(9,334 |
) |
|
|
(25,000 |
) |
|
|
(19,950 |
) |
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,002 |
) |
CDO
V deconsolidation |
|
|
(32,289 |
) |
|
|
(1,908 |
) |
|
|
(14,568 |
) |
|
|
(3,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52,598 |
) |
Total
gains (losses) (B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included
in net income (C) |
|
|
5,107 |
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
(1,210 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
3,385 |
|
|
|
7,939 |
|
Included
in other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
23,931 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3,307 |
|
|
|
(3,005 |
) |
|
|
(1,613 |
) |
|
|
22,634 |
|
Amortization
included in interest income |
|
|
13,950 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
6,923 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
22,217 |
|
Purchases,
sales and settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases |
|
|
4,501 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,192 |
|
|
|
39,718 |
|
Proceeds
from sales |
|
|
(24,535 |
) |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
(8,624 |
) |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
(3,884 |
) |
|
|
(38,112 |
) |
Proceeds
from repayments |
|
|
(13,206 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(11,342 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(5,477 |
) |
|
|
(32,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2011 |
|
$ |
164,046 |
|
|
$ |
19,287 |
|
|
$ |
64,016 |
|
|
$ |
7,444 |
|
|
$ |
9,764 |
|
|
$ |
264,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Transfers are assumed to occur at the beginning of the quarter.
CDO V was deconsolidated on June 17, 2011. |
(B) |
None of the gains (losses) recorded in earnings during the period
is attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses) relating to Level 3 assets still held at the reporting dates. |
(C) |
These gains (losses) are recorded in the following line items
in the consolidated statement of income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended
September 30, 2011 |
|
|
|
Level
3A |
|
|
Level
3B |
|
Gain
(loss) on settlement of investments, net |
|
$ |
44,604 |
|
|
$ |
20,030 |
|
Other
income (loss), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTTI |
|
|
(1,504 |
) |
|
|
(12,091 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
43,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
(loss) on settlement of investments, net, from investments transferred into Level 3 during the period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Securities Valuation
As of September 30,
2011, Newcastles securities valuation methodology and results are further detailed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
Asset
Type |
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Amortized
Cost
Basis (A) |
|
|
Multiple
Quotes (B) |
|
|
Single
Quote (C) |
|
|
Internal
Pricing
Models (D) |
|
|
Total |
|
CMBS |
|
$ |
1,492,614 |
|
|
$ |
1,068,948 |
|
|
$ |
607,774 |
|
|
$ |
269,527 |
|
|
$ |
183,333 |
|
|
$ |
1,060,634 |
|
REIT
debt |
|
|
137,393 |
|
|
|
136,760 |
|
|
|
40,167 |
|
|
|
94,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,351 |
|
ABS
subprime |
|
|
270,430 |
|
|
|
144,048 |
|
|
|
48,012 |
|
|
|
38,876 |
|
|
|
64,016 |
|
|
|
150,904 |
|
ABS
other real estate |
|
|
52,623 |
|
|
|
41,483 |
|
|
|
31,915 |
|
|
|
651 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
40,010 |
|
FNMA
/ FHLMC |
|
|
210,673 |
|
|
|
221,915 |
|
|
|
82,968 |
|
|
|
139,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,558 |
|
CDO |
|
|
207,287 |
|
|
|
67,893 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,135 |
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
57,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
security total |
|
$ |
2,371,020 |
|
|
|
1,681,047 |
|
|
|
810,836 |
|
|
|
592,963 |
|
|
|
261,996 |
|
|
|
1,665,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,682,159 |
|
|
$ |
810,836 |
|
|
$ |
592,963 |
|
|
$ |
264,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,668,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Net of discounts (or gross of premiums) and after OTTI, including
impairment taken during the period ended September 30, 2011. |
(B) |
Management generally obtained pricing service quotations or broker
quotations from two sources, one of which was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security). Management selected
one of the quotes received as being most representative of fair value and did not use an average of the quotes. Newcastles
methodology is to not use quotes from selling brokers, unless those quotes are the only marks available, or unless the quotes
provided by other (non-selling) brokers or pricing services are, in managements judgment, not representative of fair
value. Even if Newcastle receives two or more quotes on a particular security that come from non-selling brokers or pricing
services, it does not use an average because management believes using an actual quote more closely represents a transactable
price for the security than an average level. Furthermore, in some cases there is a wide disparity between the quotes Newcastle
receives. Management believes using an average of the quotes in these cases would generally not represent the fair value of
the asset. Based on Newcastles own fair value analysis using internal models, management selects one of the quotes
which is believed to more accurately reflect fair value. Newcastle never adjusts quotes received. |
(C) |
Management was unable to obtain quotations from more than one
source on these securities. The one source was generally the seller (the party that sold us the security) or a pricing service. |
(D) |
Securities whose fair value was estimated based on internal pricing
models are further detailed as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost Basis (A) |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Impairment
Recorded
In Current
Period |
|
|
Unrealized
Gains (Losses)
in Accumulated
OCI |
|
|
Assumption
Ranges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount
Rate |
|
Prepayment
Speed (E) |
|
Cumulative
Default Rate |
|
Loss
Severity |
CMBS
Conduit |
|
$ |
131,033 |
|
|
$ |
164,045 |
|
|
$ |
5,969 |
|
|
$ |
33,012 |
|
|
12% |
|
N/A |
|
2% - 100% |
|
30% - 100% |
CMBS
Large loan / Single borrower |
|
|
20,940 |
|
|
|
19,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,652 |
) |
|
9% - 16% |
|
N/A |
|
0% - 100% |
|
0% - 100% |
ABS
subprime |
|
|
51,854 |
|
|
|
64,016 |
|
|
|
2,502 |
|
|
|
12,162 |
|
|
8% |
|
0% - 8% |
|
27% - 88% |
|
60% - 100% |
ABS
other RE |
|
|
9,039 |
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(1,595 |
) |
|
8% |
|
1% - 3% |
|
38% - 63% |
|
80% - 100% |
CDO
Securities |
|
|
7,103 |
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
10% - 16% |
|
0% - 6% |
|
21% - 100% |
|
21% - 100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
security total |
|
$ |
219,969 |
|
|
$ |
261,996 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
$ |
42,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
securities |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
2,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
221,081 |
|
|
$ |
264,557 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
$ |
43,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the assumptions
listed have some degree of market observability, based on Newcastles knowledge of the market, relationships with market
participants, and use of common market data sources. Collateral prepayment, default and loss severity projections are in the form
of curves or vectors that vary for each monthly collateral cash flow projection. Methods used to develop
these projections vary by asset class (e.g., CMBS projections are developed differently than home equity ABS projections) but
conform to industry conventions. Newcastle uses assumptions that generate its best estimate of future cash flows of each
respective security.
The prepayment vector
specifies the percentage of the collateral balance that is expected to voluntarily pay off at each point in the future. The prepayment
vector is based on projections from a widely published investment bank model which considers factors such as collateral FICO score,
loan-to-value ratio, debt-to-income ratio, and vintage on a loan level basis. This vector is scaled up or down to match recent
collateral-specific prepayment experience, as obtained from remittance reports and market data services.
Loss severities are
based on recent collateral-specific experience with additional consideration given to collateral characteristics. Collateral age
is taken into consideration because severities tend to initially increase with collateral age before eventually stabilizing. Newcastle
typically uses projected severities that are higher than the historic experience for collateral that is relatively new to account
for this effect. Collateral characteristics such as loan size, lien position, and location (state) also effect loss severity.
Newcastle considers whether a collateral pool has experienced a significant change in its composition with respect to these factors
when assigning severity projections.
Default rates are
determined from the current pipeline of loans that are more than 90 days delinquent, in foreclosure, or are real
estate owned (REO). These significantly delinquent loans determine the first 24 months of the default vector. Beyond month 24,
the default vector transitions to a steady-state value that is generally equal to or greater than that given by the widely published
investment bank model.
The discount rates Newcastle
uses are derived from a range of observable pricing on securities backed by similar collateral and offered in a live market. As
the markets in which Newcastle transacts have become less liquid, Newcastle has had to rely on fewer data points in this analysis.
(E) |
Projected annualized average prepayment
rate. |
Loan Valuation
Loans which Newcastle does
not have the ability or intent to hold into the foreseeable future are classified as held-for-sale. As a result, these held-for-sale
loans are carried at the lower of amortized cost or fair value and are therefore recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
These loans were written down to fair value at the time of the impairment, based on broker quotations, pricing service quotations
or internal pricing models. All the loans were within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. For real estate related loans, the
most significant inputs used in the valuations are the amount and timing of expected future cash flows, market yields and the
estimated collateral value of such loan investments. For residential mortgage loans, significant inputs include managements
expectations of prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities and discount rates that market participants would use in determining
the fair values of similar pools of residential mortgage loans.
The following tables summarize
certain information for real estate related loans and residential mortgage loans held-for-sale as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
Valuation
Allowance/
(Reversal) In
Current Year |
|
|
Significant
Input Ranges |
|
|
|
|
Loan
Type |
|
|
|
|
|
Discount Rate |
|
Loss Severity |
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine |
|
$ |
560,563 |
|
|
$ |
443,361 |
|
|
$ |
448,665 |
|
|
$ |
(49,892 |
) |
|
8.0% - 24.3% |
|
0.0% - 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
Bank
Loan |
|
|
277,541 |
|
|
|
159,878 |
|
|
|
161,901 |
|
|
|
17,346 |
|
|
10.3% - 25.0% |
|
0.0% - 74.0% |
|
|
|
|
B-Note |
|
|
255,085 |
|
|
|
187,865 |
|
|
|
187,865 |
|
|
|
(11,151 |
) |
|
6.4% - 26.2% |
|
0.0% - 100.0% |
|
|
|
|
Whole
Loan |
|
|
30,670 |
|
|
|
30,670 |
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2% - 7.1% |
|
0.0% - 15.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Real Estate Related Loans Held-for-Sale, Net |
|
$ |
1,123,859 |
|
|
$ |
821,774 |
|
|
$ |
829,118 |
|
|
$ |
(43,697 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Allowance/
(Reversal) In
Current Year |
|
|
Significant
Input Ranges |
|
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
Discount
Rate |
|
Prepayment
Speed |
|
Constant
Default
Rate |
|
Loss
Severity |
Loan
Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-securitized
Manufactured Housing Loans I |
|
$ |
775 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
47.9% |
|
3.0% |
|
53.0% |
|
75.0% |
Non-securitized
Manufactured Housing Loans II |
|
|
5,407 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
(929 |
) |
|
15.6% |
|
5.0% |
|
12.7% |
|
80.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Residential Mortgage Loans Held-for-Sale, Net |
|
$ |
6,182 |
|
|
$ |
3,031 |
|
|
$ |
3,031 |
|
|
$ |
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans which Newcastle has the
intent and ability to hold into the foreseeable future are classified as held-for-investment. Loans held-for-investment are carried
at the aggregate unpaid principal balance adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, deferred fees or expenses, an allowance
for loan losses, charge-offs and write-downs for impaired loans.
The following table summarizes
certain information for residential mortgage loans held-for-investment as of September 30, 2011:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
Allowance/
(Reversal) In
Current Year |
|
|
Significant
Input Ranges |
|
|
Outstanding
Face
Amount |
|
|
Carrying
Value |
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
Discount
Rate |
|
Prepayment
Speed
|
|
Constant
Default
Rate
|
|
Loss
Severity |
Loan
Type |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized
Manufactured Housing Loans I |
|
$ |
139,116 |
|
|
$ |
115,357 |
|
|
$ |
117,960 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
9.5% |
|
3.0% |
|
4.0% |
|
75.0% |
Securitized
Manufactured Housing Loans II |
|
|
184,615 |
|
|
|
180,926 |
|
|
|
179,125 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
7.6% |
|
5.0% |
|
3.5% |
|
80.0% |
Residential
Loans |
|
|
61,391 |
|
|
|
44,206 |
|
|
|
44,206 |
|
|
|
3,748 |
|
|
5.0% - 7.0% |
|
0.0% - 4.0% |
|
0.0% - 3.0% |
|
0.0% - 50.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Residential Mortgage Loans, Held-for-Investment, Net |
|
$ |
385,122 |
|
|
$ |
340,489 |
|
|
$ |
341,291 |
|
|
$ |
6,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
Newcastles derivative
instruments are valued using counterparty quotations. These quotations are generally based on valuation models with model inputs
that can generally be verified and which do not involve significant judgment. The significant observable inputs used in determining
the fair value of our Level 2 derivative contracts are contractual cash flows and market based interest rate curves. Newcastles
derivatives are recorded on its balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value |
|
|
|
Balance
sheet location |
|
September 30,
2011 |
|
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Derivative
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate caps, designated as hedges |
|
Derivative Assets |
|
$ |
1,384 |
|
|
$ |
4,537 |
|
Interest
rate caps, not designated as hedges |
|
Derivative Assets |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
2,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,383 |
|
|
$ |
7,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
rate swaps, designated as hedges |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
$ |
99,531 |
|
|
$ |
136,575 |
|
Interest
rate swaps, not designated as hedges |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
32,525 |
|
|
|
40,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
132,056 |
|
|
$ |
176,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes
information related to derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
2011 |
|
|
December 31,
2010 |
|
Cash
flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
amount of interest rate swap agreements |
|
$ |
992,673 |
|
|
$ |
1,473,669 |
|
Notional
amount of interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
104,205 |
|
|
|
104,205 |
|
Amount
of (loss) recognized in OCI on effective portion |
|
|
(79,034 |
) |
|
|
(118,608 |
) |
Deferred
hedge gain (loss) related to anticipated financings, which have subsequently occurred, net of amortization |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
Deferred
hedge gain (loss) related to dedesignation, net of amortization |
|
|
(576 |
) |
|
|
1,343 |
|
Expected
reclassification of deferred hedges from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
Expected
reclassification of current hedges from AOCI into earnings over the next 12 months |
|
|
(42,787 |
) |
|
|
(63,541 |
) |
Non-hedge
Derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
amount of interest rate swap agreements |
|
|
316,922 |
|
|
|
343,570 |
|
Notional
amount of interest rate cap agreements |
|
|
36,428 |
|
|
|
36,428 |
|
The following table summarizes
gains (losses) recorded in relation to derivatives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
September 30, |
|
|
Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
|
|
|
Income statement location |
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
2010 |
|
Cash
flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
(loss) on the ineffective portion |
|
Other income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,181 |
) |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
(881 |
) |
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
Gain
(loss) immediately recognized at dedesignation |
|
Gain (loss) on sale
of investments; Other income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,279 |
) |
|
|
(13,796 |
) |
|
|
(10,558 |
) |
Amount
of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income, related to effective portion |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(12,824 |
) |
|
|
(20,304 |
) |
|
|
(51,532 |
) |
|
|
(63,426 |
) |
Deferred
hedge gain reclassified from AOCI into income, related to anticipated financings |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Deferred
hedge gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income, related to effective portion of dedesignated hedges |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
(4,172 |
) |
Non-hedge
derivatives gain (loss) |
|
Other income
(loss) |
|
|
(2,109 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
(5,992 |
) |
|