DEBT OBLIGATIONS |
6. DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The following table presents certain information
regarding Newcastles debt obligations and related hedges at September 30, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unhedged |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Face |
|
|
Collateral |
|
|
Aggregate Notional |
|
Debt Obligation/Collateral |
|
Month Issued |
|
|
Outstanding Face Amount |
|
|
Carrying Value |
|
|
Final Stated Maturity |
|
Weighted Average Funding Cost (A) |
|
|
Weighted Average Funding Cost (B) |
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Amount of Floating Rate Debt |
|
|
Outstanding Face Amount (C) |
|
|
Amortized Cost Basis (C) |
|
|
Carrying Value (C) |
|
|
Weighted Average Maturity (Years) |
|
|
Floating Rate Face Amount (C) |
|
|
Amount of Current Hedges (D) |
|
CDO Bonds Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO IV (E) |
|
|
Mar 2004 |
|
|
$ |
86,983 |
|
|
$ |
86,872 |
|
|
Mar 2039 |
|
|
1.81 |
% |
|
|
4.99 |
% |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
76,103 |
|
|
$ |
175,752 |
|
|
$ |
165,292 |
|
|
$ |
158,371 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
48,891 |
|
|
$ |
76,103 |
|
CDO VI (E) |
|
|
Apr 2005 |
|
|
|
91,469 |
|
|
|
91,469 |
|
|
Apr 2040 |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
5.35 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
88,437 |
|
|
|
208,094 |
|
|
|
119,483 |
|
|
|
145,273 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
51,154 |
|
|
|
88,437 |
|
CDO VIII |
|
|
Nov 2006 |
|
|
|
529,337 |
|
|
|
528,278 |
|
|
Nov 2052 |
|
|
0.77 |
% |
|
|
2.18 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
521,737 |
|
|
|
708,193 |
|
|
|
517,123 |
|
|
|
538,238 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
389,155 |
|
|
|
154,795 |
|
CDO IX |
|
|
May 2007 |
|
|
|
446,956 |
|
|
|
448,461 |
|
|
May 2052 |
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
0.57 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
446,956 |
|
|
|
672,126 |
|
|
|
543,431 |
|
|
|
551,501 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
328,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,154,745 |
|
|
|
1,155,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
1,133,233 |
|
|
|
1,764,165 |
|
|
|
1,345,329 |
|
|
|
1,393,383 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
817,476 |
|
|
|
319,335 |
|
Other Bonds and Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MH loans Portfolio I (F) |
|
|
Apr 2010 |
|
|
|
73,431 |
|
|
|
69,441 |
|
|
Jul 2035 |
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
|
6.20 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,453 |
|
|
|
102,746 |
|
|
|
102,746 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
978 |
|
|
|
|
|
MH loans Portfolio II |
|
|
May 2011 |
|
|
|
123,797 |
|
|
|
122,961 |
|
|
Dec 2033 |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
4.35 |
% |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158,542 |
|
|
|
155,933 |
|
|
|
155,933 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
26,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage Loans (G) |
|
|
Aug 2006 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
Dec 2034 |
|
|
LIBOR+ 0.90% |
|
|
|
1.11 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
53,384 |
|
|
|
39,208 |
|
|
|
39,208 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
53,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,409 |
|
|
|
197,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.92 |
% |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
5,181 |
|
|
|
334,379 |
|
|
|
297,887 |
|
|
|
297,887 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
81,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase Agreements (H) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO securities (I) |
|
|
Dec 2011 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
Oct 2012 |
|
|
LIBOR+ 2.00% |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
7,157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-agency RMBS (J) |
|
|
Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
59,646 |
|
|
|
59,646 |
|
|
Oct 2012 |
|
|
LIBOR+ 2.00% |
|
|
|
2.21 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
59,646 |
|
|
|
127,549 |
|
|
|
87,580 |
|
|
|
90,428 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
127,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
FNMA/FHLMC securities (K) |
|
|
Various |
|
|
|
538,524 |
|
|
|
538,524 |
|
|
Oct 2012 |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.42 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
538,524 |
|
|
|
534,801 |
|
|
|
572,356 |
|
|
|
577,132 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
534,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
605,327 |
|
|
|
605,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
605,327 |
|
|
|
662,350 |
|
|
|
659,936 |
|
|
|
667,560 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
662,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Notes Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior living facilities |
|
|
Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
Aug 2019 |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
141,553 |
|
|
|
141,553 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
88,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
141,553 |
|
|
|
141,553 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,400 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior subordinated notes payable |
|
|
Mar 2006 |
|
|
|
51,004 |
|
|
|
51,245 |
|
|
Apr 2035 |
|
|
7.57% (M) |
|
|
|
7.41 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,004 |
|
|
|
51,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.41 |
% |
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101,885 |
|
|
|
2,097,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,767,141 |
|
|
$ |
2,760,894 |
|
|
$ |
2,444,705 |
|
|
$ |
2,500,383 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,561,022 |
|
|
$ |
342,735 |
|
Financing on subprime mortgage loans subject to call option |
|
|
(L) |
|
|
|
406,217 |
|
|
|
405,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,508,102 |
|
|
$ |
2,503,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(A) |
Weighted average, including floating and fixed rate classes and including the amortization of deferred financing costs. |
(B) |
Including the effect of applicable hedges. |
(C) |
Excluding (i) restricted cash held in CDOs to be used for principal and interest payments of CDO debt, and (ii) operating cash in senior living entities. |
(D) |
Including a $23.4 million notional amount of interest rate cap agreement for the mortgage notes payable and a $76.1 million and $88.4 million notional amount of interest rate swap agreements in CDO IV and CDO VI, respectively, which were economic hedges not designated as hedges for accounting purposes. |
(E) |
CDO VI was not in compliance with its applicable over collateralization tests as of September 30, 2012. Newcastle is not receiving cash flows from these CDOs (other than senior management fees and cash flows on senior classes of bonds that were repurchased), since net interest is being used to repay debt, and expects CDO VI to remain out of compliance for the foreseeable future. |
(F) |
Excluding $20.5 million face amount of other bonds payable relating to MH loans Portfolio I sold to certain Newcastle CDOs, which were eliminated in consolidation. |
(G) |
Excluding $6.6 million face amount of notes payable relating to residential mortgage loans sold to a Newcastle CDO, which were eliminated in consolidation. |
(H) |
These repurchase agreements had $0.1 million of associated accrued interest payable at
September 30, 2012. $395.3 million face amount of these repurchase agreements were renewed subsequent to September 30,
2012. |
(I) |
The counterparty of this repurchase agreement is Bank of America. It is secured by $26.4 million face amount of senior notes issued by Newcastle CDO VI, which is eliminated in consolidation. The maximum recourse to Newcastle is $1.8 million. |
(J) |
The counterparty of these repurchase agreements is Credit Suisse. |
(K) |
The counterparties on these repurchase agreements are Bank of America, Citi, and Goldman Sachs. Interest rates on these repurchase agreements are fixed, but will be reset on a short-term basis. |
(L) |
Issued in April 2006 and July 2007. See Note 4 regarding the securitizations of Subprime Portfolios I and II. |
(M) |
LIBOR + 2.25% after April 2016. |
Each CDO financing is subject to tests that
measure the amount of over collateralization and excess interest in the transaction. Failure to satisfy these tests would cause
the principal and/or interest cashflow that would otherwise be distributed to more junior classes of securities (including those
held by Newcastle) to be redirected to pay down the most senior class of securities outstanding until the tests are satisfied.
As a result, our cash flow and liquidity are negatively impacted upon such a failure. As of September 30, 2012, CDO VI was not
in compliance with its over collateralization tests.
In the first nine months of 2012, Newcastle
repurchased $34.1 million face amount of CDO bonds payable for $10.8 million. As a result, Newcastle extinguished $34.1 million
face amount of CDO bonds payable and recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt of $23.1 million.
Newcastles non-CDO financings contain various customary loan
covenants. Newcastle was in compliance with all of the covenants in its non-CDO financings as of September 30, 2012.
|